Hi folks,
I was talking with Rolf on IRC, and I mentioned that a while ago I'd
brainstormed a list of features that would have been useful to my
workplace in particular.
Here are the list of things that would be appealing for Gitorious in
my workplace. These are just some rough ideas.
== Large
Hi Gitorious devs,
I have a couple merge requests pending for libdolt and dolt, and it
would be great to see
these merged upstream. I've listed them in order of priority.
https://gitorious.org/gitorious/libdolt/merge_requests/8 - This should
allow Jenkins builds to pass again for libdolt.
Hi folks,
There was some work in master recently that referenced issue #7. For example:
commit 74617cfcb0abaae7e34d5a10abac609d9e98d5f1
Author: Pawel Pierzchala pa...@powow.no
Date: Fri Mar 7 15:24:52 2014 +0100
Tweak sorting ui. Refs #7
However, this page is a 404 error for me:
Hi folks,
I have a couple merge requests pending, and it would be great to see
these merged upstream. I've listed them in order of ease-of-review.
Correct spelling of LDAPAuthenticationTest in comments:
https://gitorious.org/gitorious/mainline/merge_requests/256
Remove Ruby 1.8 support from
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Katie Poskaitis
kposkaitis2...@gmail.com wrote:
Found the issue. Our passwords expire after a single use and it tries to use
your password 3 times when logging in an registering the user.
Gitorious only binds once, though:
79 # If no bind user has been
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Justin Smith magn...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to use the Web-Hooks with Jenkins-CI. Jenkins has a plugin to do
this, see the source:
https://github.com/jenkinsci/gitorious-plugin/blob/master/src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/gitorious/GitoriousStatus.java
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Paweł Pierzchała pa...@gitorious.org wrote:
Hi Ken,
thank you for the contributions, I'll merge them today.
By the way, the github-markup version bump one needs more work before
it is safe to merge. Sorry about that!
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Paweł Pierzchała pa...@gitorious.org wrote:
No worries, I've fixed the issue with tests, I merged all the other changes
as well. I've released new versions of libdolt and makeup gems.
Cool, I was struggling with knowing what to do about the m[:suffix]
bit. Your
Hi folks,
I wanted to clarify how builds work in Jenkins, at
https://ci.gitorious.org/jenkins/
Each of the jobs are set up as multi-configuration projects. I set
things up this way so that we could test the builds on multiple
platforms.
For example, we started out on CentOS 6 with the standard
Looks like we'll want to fix it in the source code for ui3.
https://gitorious.org/gitorious/ui3/merge_requests/2
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Jonathan Wakely abuse...@kayari.org wrote:
I probably should have just fixed it rather than posting it here.
Merge request now at
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Alexandre Beauclair
abeaucl...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'm pretty much at a loss as to what I should do, as my configs are
similar to the working install (adapted for the test install of course).
Thanks for any input you can give me!
Here's the code that's failing,
Hi David,
You mentioned in the subject: how to use existing ruby
I really wish that Gitorious was going to work on RHEL 6's standard
Ruby. The tricky part is that RHEL 6 ships with Ruby 1.8.7, and there
have been a massive amount of changes between that version of Ruby and
something more modern
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote:
By the way, looking at your build failure a bit more, it looks like
the root problem is that OpenSSL in RHEL 6 does not support elliptic
curves, and chruby unconditionally wants to build against an OpenSSL
with EC
Hi folks,
ui3's .gitmodules file references samsam on GitHub. This stuck out
to me because the Git URL for the submodule happens to an SSH URL, so
I thought we should change it to a HTTPS URL for consistency.
However, I'm now thinking that samsam might have been added to
.gitmodules
+ and
recommends ruby 2.0.
Hi Marcin,
I'm at the place where I recognize that 1.8.7 compatibility is
entirely a lost cause, so these merge requests were simply to allow us
to transition Jenkins over to Ruby 1.9.3. That's what I meant in my
earlier email:
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Ken Dreyer ktdre
Hi folks,
I was looking over the dependency chain for mainline, and I see that
the proxymachine gem underpins the bin/git-proxy script. A couple
questions:
1) In general, should Gitorious administrators be using bin/git-proxy
instead of script/git-daemon?
2) The proxymachine gem has not had any
Hi folks,
I'm trying to figure out if we can drop the binding_of_caller
dependency from Gitorious.
binding_of_caller entered our Gemfile with this commit:
commit 42de02566fdb8c6aa0616305b549b185ec0e9e0d
Author: Marius Mathiesen mar...@gitorious.org
Date: Tue Jul 2 13:04:45 2013 +0200
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote:
Since Gitorious mainline itself is now more heavily tied to Ruby 1.9
as a minimum dependency, I've given up on maintaining Ruby 1.8 support
in capillary_rb and libdolt as well. I've removed the Ruby 1.8
buildslave from
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Christian Johansen chrisj...@gmail.com wrote:
https://gitorious.org/capillary/capillary_rb/merge_requests/8
Thanks Ken!
Merged. If you find more stuff like this (unnecessary gems) feel free to
let me know.
Awesome! Thank you.
- Ken
--
--
To post to this
Hi folks,
In packaging the capillary Gem for Fedora, I'm running the test suite
during the RPM's %check function. The capillary test suite requires
the mini_shoulda gem, so I would need to package this gem for Fedora.
The problem is that mini_shoulda is deprecated, so there's not much
point in
With the recent UTF-8 fixes in Gitorious, there have been a couple
patches to capillary_rb and libdolt that have brought in newer String
functions like encode() or force_encoding() unconditionally. Since
these functions are not available on Ruby 1.8, this means that these
gems now only run on Ruby
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Marius Mårnes Mathiesen
marius.mathie...@gmail.com wrote:
Ken Dreyer writes:
Hi folks,
I finally added the Ruby 1.9.3 buildslave to the gitorious project in
Jenkins. The test suite is currently failing because activesupport is
trying to search for tmp/cache
Hi folks,
I wonder if someone with admin access to the Ohloh Gitorious settings
could alter it to point at the next branch? Currently it's pointing
at master, which doesn't get much activity. I think next would be
much more representative of the work that is happening in the project.
Hi folks,
Unfortunately the recent ThinkingSphinx bump in
0e162d083d4f005355b1320b2dad91688cb0c615 pushed us to a version of
ThinkingSphinx that does not work on Ruby 1.8.7.
I looked a bit into what it would take to fix it, and the short
version is that it was over my head :)
ThinkingSphinx has
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Unfortunately the recent ThinkingSphinx bump in
0e162d083d4f005355b1320b2dad91688cb0c615 pushed us to a version of
ThinkingSphinx that does not work on Ruby 1.8.7.
By the way, in order to avoid an being
Might I suggest a different IRC /topic for the #gitorious channel on
Freenode? I think some slight tweaks would eliminate repeat questions
in IRC, and it might encourage users to get more involved. In
particular I noticed bugs get reported in IRC during off-hours.
Current #gitorious topic:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Christian Johansen chrisj...@gmail.com wrote:
There is also a problem related to the way that execute() gets called
on anonymous classes on Ruby 1.8.7. I tried to wrap my mind around the
use_case gem so I could understand how to fix it, but it is beyond me.
for this stuff too.
Thanks for considering this!
- Ken
[1] https://gitorious.org/gitorious/mainline/merge_requests/239
[2] http://people.redhat.com/bkabrda/ruby193-rhel-6/
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Marius Mårnes Mathiesen
marius.mathie...@gmail.com wrote:
Ken Dreyer writes:
Hi folks
Hi folks,
It looks like the better_errors gem that went into the next branch
is incompatible with Ruby 1.8.7:
https://ci.gitorious.org/jenkins/job/mainline/13/label=centos-6-x86_64/console
The specific commit was
42de02566fdb8c6aa0616305b549b185ec0e9e0d
Is there any way to use a
I recently investigated some test suite failures on the next branch.
For Fedora 19 (Ruby 2.0.0), there's a really simple adjustment that is
needed. The details are at
https://gitorious.org/gitorious/mainline/merge_requests/235
For CentOS 6 (Ruby 1.8.7), the failures are more complex. The
refute_
Hi Christian,
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Christian Johansen
chrisj...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, the old test simply stubs the method being used. In your updated
example that's not going to turn out pretty. I suggest giving FakeWeb a
look: https://github.com/chrisk/fakeweb
Let me know if
Hi folks,
I've added preliminary support for HTTPS web hooks:
https://gitorious.org/~ktdreyer/gitorious/ktdreyers-mainline/commits/https-webhooks
I'm a newbie to Ruby testing so please be kind :-) ... I'm not sure
how to update the unit tests to match this change. See my FIXME
lines in
Hi Frank,
Check out the custom_username_label in gitorious.yml. You can set
the login label string to whatever you wish.
- Ken
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 6:34 AM, frank.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I am running Gitorious inside our company using LDAP Authentication.
Gitorious is running fine, but
Hi Bobbie,
You may be able to get more information out of the production.log
file. Here's some things to check:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Bobby bo...@guardedhorizons.com wrote:
When trying to authenticate through the web interface, I have tried the
following options below and keep
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Christian Johansen chrisj...@gmail.com wrote:
Being able to run multiple Gitorious instances on a box would be a
nice-to-have, but in my opinion not critical, and probably not well
suited for production use unless each instance has relatively few
users/projects
for splitting out the git user,
so that I can have a unique git UID inside each chroot, with its own
home dir, SSH keys, etc. I don't know of any other way to do that,
short of full OS virtualization.
- Ken
On Mar 18, 2013, at 12:24, Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013
Hi Joshua,
It looks like some email to the list got delayed, and I think we might
have talked about this in IRC, but I'll reply here too for the record.
From your pastebin I see you have this line:
KrbMethodK5Passwd on
mod_auth_kerb has two modes of operation: Negotiate authentication and
I recently hit a snag in my packaging efforts for Fedora. The problem
is that Gitorious wants to run its test suite against a live MySQL
server. Unfortunately there's no reliable way to start up and shut
down mysqld inside the build chroots that Fedora uses.
Here's a mailing list thread where I
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Andrew Kerr arrk...@arrkerr.com wrote:
I do have to wonder if it might be better to just roll up an RPM and be done
with it. Gitorious is already structured in a way that would lend its self
well to this, I believe. Or skip the dependencies and just have the
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Marius Mathiesen
marius.mathie...@gmail.com wrote:
Any other things we should consider? Other thoughts?
Hi Marius,
I think this is a great move for the project.
What do you think about time frame commitments? When I ran into a
security issue a while back[1], I
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Christian Johansen chrisj...@gmail.com wrote:
As it happens, I am one of two principal Buster.JS developers.
Yes, thank you for your work on this!
I have now replaced this module with bane, which provides the
functionality needed for Capillary (the JavaScript
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Marius Mårnes Mathiesen
marius.mathie...@gmail.com wrote:
Another approach could be to use eg. btrfs and set up subvolumes for new
projects in the repository root, assuming you're running with un-sharded
paths. Let's say a user creates a project gitorious and
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:35 AM, anapsix anastas.seme...@gmail.com wrote:
Would a pre-receive hook get file sizes from client when push is
initiated? If so, calculating available space (quota allowance) and
rejecting push based on that would be trivial..
Yes, I was wondering the same thing.
Hi folks,
I just had a developer fill up my Gitorious partition with a very
large git repo. The problem was compounded by the fact that I
neglected to put /var/gitorious on its own partition... whoops. I
remedied that in hindsight :)
I'm trying to brainstorm the best way to prevent one repo or
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:38 PM, jpatal...@gmail.com wrote:
/home/git/gitorious/lib/tasks/../gitorious.rb
module Gitorious
HEAD
VERSION = 2.3.2
===
VERSION = 2.4.1
v2.4.1
end
The and characters makes me wonder if you're installation is
stuck in the middle of a merge or
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Jaco Theron jacothero...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Marius,
I installed sphinx RPM like this:
wget
ftp://mirror.as24220.net/pub/epel/6/x86_64/sphinx-0.9.9-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
rpm -Uvh sphinx-0.9.9-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
Hi Jaco,
You should also be sure to install the
I noticed that even when is_gitorious_dot_org is false, there is still
a link to /gitorious here:
app/views/site/index.html.erb
% if GitoriousConfig['public_mode'] || logged_in? -%
div id=left
% pull_box(nil, :class = expose) do -%
p
Gitorious provides a href=/gitoriousopen source/a
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Jaco Theron jacothero...@gmail.com wrote:
Encountered a problem with installing sphinx. (CentOS 6)
sudo yum -y install sphinx
The above command does not find sphinx.
Does the sphinx package in EPEL work for you?
- Ken
--
To post to this group, send email
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Marius Mårnes Mathiesen
zmalltal...@zmalltalker.com wrote:
However, there's an if clause around that call: `unless
committerships.any?{|c|c.committer == another_owner}` which means that
if the new owner already has access to the repository, a new
committership
Context: I've got an intranet Gitorious instance set up, with a couple
self-managed teams.
I just had some users lose access to some repos when they transferred
the repos to a team. Even though these users were members of the group
which was the Owner, the users still had no admin rights to the
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Walter Boring wabor...@hemna.com wrote:
Well, I resorted to the only option I could at this point and hacked the
code myself.
Can you let us know what version of the code you are running? It
sounds like this could be a bug in that version.
- Ken
--
To post to
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Semyazz semy...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to have Gitorious --- repository server and Jenkins --- build
server.
You might want to read this thread from the Jenkins Gitorious plugin author [1]
Also I'd like to have some kind of intermediate state where
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Marius Mårnes Mathiesen
marius.mathie...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you think?
Sounds straightforward to me. Thanks for outlining this.
My one suggestion is to make this policy crystal clear to new
developers. Whenever I write a patch for a project I want to know
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Chris Holden cholde...@gmail.com wrote:
Thomas,
THank you, I will do the work since it's my need, just wanted to confirm I
was on the right path. :)
Looks like some of the $operatingsystem conditionals could use
$osfamily instead, and work across the whole
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Peter Kjellerstedt
peter.kjellerst...@axis.com wrote:
Couldn’t you just change the validation in app/models/user.rb that validates
the length of the login to be between 3 and 40 characters to allow 2 to 40
instead? That is what we have done here…
My concern
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Federico Don federico.do...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Gitorious Private has integrated code review? Where do I find this option?
I think that means users can comment on commits and merge requests?
- Ken
--
To post to this group, send email to
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Federico Don federico.do...@gmail.com wrote:
I can see on http://gitorious.com/feature_list code review
what is the meaning of this point?
Merge requests and code review
The Gitorious web interface aids code review and git workflow.
Where do I find this
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Dominick Rivard
dominick.riv...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for pointing out the instructions. I followed them, the only thing I
added to fix was a conflict in the gitorious.sample.yml.
Ok, sounds like the author needs to rebase their merge request onto
the latest
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 7:04 AM, guy...@leloop.org wrote:
and then Marius Mårnes Mathiesen
suggests to add github's API to gitorious.
I can speak to this one, since it was my original suggestion and
Marius was answering - I was just tossing out an idea for API
construction in the future
Hello,
I'd like to get some feedback on a configuration idea.
The gitorious.yml file contains a cookie_secret session key. Other
than this one parameter, gitorious.yml doesn't contain any
cryptographic material. I think it would be advantageous to move this
one parameter out into its own file,
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Dominick Rivard
dominick.riv...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to disable it through a
configuration?
The functionality does not yet exist in mainline gitorious, but there
is a patch in the merge request queue to do this [1]. If the patch
works for you, you
Capillary devs,
I see capillary 1.0.1 has been released. Would you mind pushing the
tag to the capillary repo on Gitorious?
(If there is a better avenue to request this sort of thing, please let me know.)
- Ken
--
To post to this group, send email to gitorious@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:17 AM, dpwrussell r...@dpwrussell.com wrote:
I see that there is the concept of versioning for some time now in
Gitorious, but all the installation instructions I have seen involve a
checkout from mainline (If versioning is active I'd have expected a checkout
of a
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Federico Don federico.do...@gmail.com wrote:
I need the opinion of the group, you must implement code reviews with gerrit
in gitorious? is this really necessary?
I hope your opinion!
My preference would be to simply use merge requests for this purpose
because
Sebastian Noack and I were discussing the Gitorious::Authentication
plugins, and Sebastian brought up an interesting point.
Sebastian noticed that the Kerberos plugin only replaces dots ('.') in
usernames, but there are more invalid characters. In his SSL
Authentication plugin, he uses a regex to
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Federico Don federico.do...@gmail.com wrote:
A NoMethodError occurred in sessions#create:
undefined method `username_filter' for
#Gitorious::Authentication::LDAPAuthentication:0x128a5860
[RAILS_ROOT]/lib/gitorious/authentication/ldap_authentication.rb:85:in
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Federico Don federico.do...@gmail.com wrote:
bind_username: USER_BIND
bind_password: PASSWORD_BIND
As I understand it, the problem is that
https://gitorious.org/gitorious/mainline/merge_requests/181 has not
been updated with the changes that happened
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:23 AM, Thomas Chemineau
thomas.chemin...@gmail.com wrote:
I ask myself if Gitorious was able to authenticate user by using HTTP header
to find username. Could it be possible ?
Hi Thomas,
I've submitted a plugin for Kerberos authentication, which is very
similar to what
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Marius Mårnes Mathiesen
marius.mathie...@gmail.com wrote:
That's an elegant solution. Would you mind sending a merge request for that?
Sure thing, submitted at
https://gitorious.org/gitorious/mainline/merge_requests/205
- Ken
--
To post to this group, send
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote:
I think it would be better to register the LDAP or Kerberos users with
cryptographically random passwords. What form do you recommend?
Digging a bit more, it looks like the Crowd plugin suffers from the
same default
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Marius Mårnes Mathiesen
marius.mathie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote:
I think this looks really good, and I'd love it if you'd submit a merge
request for it.
Thanks - this is really appreciated
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote:
Both patches are attached, rebased against current master (430eb2bda).
Please let me know if these look ok :)
Gitorious devs,
If my approach here is ok, please let me know and I'll submit a merge
request to get
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Marius Mårnes Mathiesen
marius.mathie...@gmail.com wrote:
Great work! I know next to nothing about Kerberos, but it's been on my todo
list for a while to investigate how to support it in Gitorious.
Thanks! I appreciate your review and your feedback.
I
I recently hacked Kerberos authentication onto the Gitorious web interface.
In conjunction with Apache's mod_auth_kerb, the Rails app pulls the
username out of request.env['REMOTE_USER'] and uses that in a manner
similar to the current code's OpenID handling: If the user doesn't yet
exist in
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote:
I recently hacked Kerberos authentication onto the Gitorious web interface.
I ended up implementing this in a less hackish way, with a proper
Gitorious::Authentication::KerberosAuthentication module. The core
code changes
75 matches
Mail list logo
