Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression recovered (with patches)

2015-03-30 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:10:20AM +0530, Venky Shankar wrote: Review done, awaiting clarification on a minor question from Venky (changelog maintainer). Have a minor comment. Rest is all good. I addressed the minor comment. Please bring the +1 review)! There is no need for release-3.6

Re: [Gluster-devel] Hangouts for 3.7 features

2015-03-30 Thread Venky Shankar
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Venky Shankar yknev.shan...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com wrote: Hi All, As we inch closer to 3.7.0, I think it might be a good idea to talk about new/improved features in 3.7 and do a demo of the features

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression recovered (with patches)

2015-03-30 Thread Venky Shankar
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:10:20AM +0530, Venky Shankar wrote: Review done, awaiting clarification on a minor question from Venky (changelog maintainer). Have a minor comment. Rest is all good. I addressed the

Re: [Gluster-devel] About split-brain-resolution.t

2015-03-30 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On 03/30/2015 06:01 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 05:44:23PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: Problem here is that ' inode_forget' is coming even before it gets to inspect the file. We initially thought we should 'ref' the inode when the user specifies the choice and

Re: [Gluster-devel] About split-brain-resolution.t

2015-03-30 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On 03/30/2015 06:34 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkara...@redhat.com wrote: Since spb_choice is not saved as an attribute for the file on the bricks, it cannot be recovered when the context is reallocated. Either that save feature has been forgotten, or going to

Re: [Gluster-devel] Spurious Failures in regression runs

2015-03-30 Thread Justin Clift
On 30 Mar 2015, at 18:54, Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com wrote: Hi All, We are attempting to capture all known spurious regression failures from the jenkins instance in build.gluster.org at [1]. The issues listed in the etherpad impede our patch merging workflow and need to be sorted out

Re: [Gluster-devel] New features and their location in packages

2015-03-30 Thread Ravishankar N
On 03/26/2015 02:45 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: With all the new features merged, we need to know on what side of the system the new xlators, libraries and scripts are used. There always are questions on reducing the installation size on client systems, so anything that is not strictly needed

Re: [Gluster-devel] Congrats, your patch got MERGED. But you're not finished yet!

2015-03-30 Thread Atin Mukherjee
I've been personally following the same model while working on upstream bugs. IMO, this needs no additional effort but just the discipline. Because of lack of transition of bug states, our upstream BZ statistics doesn't show the exact state where we are in now. I am pretty sure numbers will look

Re: [Gluster-devel] Hangouts for 3.7 features

2015-03-30 Thread Venky Shankar
I did reserve 04/02 for you and striked out 04/02 in the etherpad :). You can still go ahead with 04/02. works for me. thanks! Thanks, Vijay ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org

Re: [Gluster-devel] Hangouts for 3.7 features

2015-03-30 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 03/30/2015 01:57 PM, Venky Shankar wrote: On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Venky Shankar yknev.shan...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com wrote: Hi All, As we inch closer to 3.7.0, I think it might be a good idea to talk about new/improved