Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression: ./tests/basic/quota.t fails

Test number 82 is a umount operation on NFS mount, not sure why umount failed. EXPECT_WITHIN $UMOUNT_TIMEOUT "Y" force_umount $N0 Thanks, Vijay On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote: > Hi, > > I see the below test failing for an unrelated patch:

Re: [Gluster-devel] sub-directory geo-replication, snapshot features

On 03/09/2016 10:40 AM, Kaushal M wrote: On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: On 03/08/2016 07:32 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: hi, Late last week I sent a solution for how to achieve subdirectory-mount support with access-controls

Re: [Gluster-devel] sub-directory geo-replication, snapshot features

regards Aravinda On 03/08/2016 07:32 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: hi, Late last week I sent a solution for how to achieve subdirectory-mount support with access-controls (http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2016-March/048537.html). What follows here is a short

Re: [Gluster-devel] Using geo-replication as backup solution using gluster volume snapshot!

Awesome idea! Now Geo-rep can be used to take daily/monthly backup. With Gluster 3.7.9, we can run Geo-replication whenever required instead of running all the time. http://review.gluster.org/13510 (geo-rep: Script to Schedule Geo-replication) Full Backup: 1. Create Geo-rep

Re: [Gluster-devel] CentOS Regression generated core by .tests/basic/tier/tier-file-create.t

Sorry for the delay in responding. I am looking at this core. Will update with my findings/patches. Pranith On 03/08/2016 12:29 PM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar wrote: Hi All, The regression run has caused the core to generate for below patch.

Re: [Gluster-devel] Review request for leases patches

Hi Poornima, On 03/07/2016 11:24 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote: Hi All, Here is the link to feature page: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11980/ Patches can be found @:

[Gluster-devel] sub-directory geo-replication, snapshot features

hi, Late last week I sent a solution for how to achieve subdirectory-mount support with access-controls (http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2016-March/048537.html). What follows here is a short description of how other features of gluster volumes are implemented for

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] tests/basic/tier/tier-file-create.t dumping core on Linux

- Original Message - > From: "Niels de Vos" > To: "Krutika Dhananjay" , "Vijay Bellur" > > Cc: "Dan Lambright" , "Gluster Devel" > , "Pranith Karampuri" >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Arbiter brick size estimation

On 03/05/2016 03:45 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: In order to estimate GlusterFS arbiter brick size, I've deployed test setup with replica 3 arbiter 1 volume within one node. Each brick is located on separate HDD (XFS with inode size == 512). Using GlusterFS v3.7.6 + memleak patches. Volume

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] tests/basic/tier/tier-file-create.t dumping core on Linux

I did talk to the author and he is going to look into the issue. 3.7.9 is round the corner and we certainly don't want bad tests to block patches that need to go in. -Krutika On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Dan Lambright wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From:

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] tests/basic/tier/tier-file-create.t dumping core on Linux

- Original Message - > From: "Krutika Dhananjay" > To: "Pranith Karampuri" > Cc: "gluster-infra" , "Gluster Devel" > , "RHGS tiering mailing > list" , "Dan

[Gluster-devel] MInutes of Gluster Community Bug Triage meeting at 12:00 UTC on 8th March, 2016

Hi All, Following are the meeting minutes for today Gluster community bug triaging meeting. Meeting ended Tue Mar 8 12:58:43 2016 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . Minutes:

[Gluster-devel] REMINDER: Gluster Community Bug Triage meeting at 12:00 UTC (~in 90 minutes)

Hi all, This meeting is scheduled for anyone that is interested in learning more about, or assisting with the Bug Triage. Meeting details: - location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC (https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=gluster-meeting ) - date: every Tuesday - time: 12:00 UTC (in

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Code-Review+2 and Verified+1 cause multiple retriggers on Jenkins

Hi Raghavendra, Can we have this documented (with a example workflow) here: http://gluster.readthedocs.org/en/latest/Developer-guide/Development-Workflow/ Thanks, Saravana On 03/07/2016 10:57 AM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Raghavendra Talur

Re: [Gluster-devel] [master] FAILED NetBSD regression: quota.t

Hi Milind, These are the two tests that failed in NetBSD: TEST $CLI volume stop $V0; EXPECT "1" get_aux We are not sure why the volume stop has failed. Since the volume stop is failed, it is obvious that the next test case would fail. Could you please retrigger and check? -- Thanks & Regards,

Re: [Gluster-devel] [master] FAILED: bug-1303028-Rebalance-glusterd-rpc-connection-issue.t

Hi Milind, There was an issue with this test case caused by a parallel cherry-pick. More info [1]. It is already fixed, and rebasing your patch will work. [1] : http://nongnu.13855.n7.nabble.com/mainline-regression-test-is-broken-td209079.html Regards! Rafi On 03/08/2016 01:56 PM, Mohammed

[Gluster-devel] [master] FAILED NetBSD regression: quota.t

https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/14776/ == Running tests in file ./tests/basic/quota.t [06:08:03] ./tests/basic/quota.t .. not ok 75 not ok 76 Failed 2/76 subtests [06:08:03] Test Summary Report

Re: [Gluster-devel] [master] FAILED: bug-1303028-Rebalance-glusterd-rpc-connection-issue.t

oops! how did I miss that :) https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/18683/ -- Milind - Original Message - From: "Mohammed Rafi K C" To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" , "Milind Changire" Cc:

Re: [Gluster-devel] [master] FAILED: bug-1303028-Rebalance-glusterd-rpc-connection-issue.t

HI Du, I will take a look. Milind, Can you please provide a link for the failed case. Rafi On 03/08/2016 12:59 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > +rafi. > > Rafi, can you have an initial analysis on this? > > regards, > Raghavendra. > > - Original Message - >> From: "Milind Changire"