Re: [Gluster-devel] How does Gluster works - Locating files after change sin cluster

On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 5:01 AM Barak Sason Rofman wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm about to post several threads with question regarding how Gluster > handles different scenarios. > I'm looking for answers on architecture/design/"the is the idea" level, > and not specifically implementation

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal: move glusterfs development to github workflow, completely

thought on this, > and conclude on this another month, so by glusterfs-8 development time, we > are clear about this. > A huge +1 to this proposal. As you said, github has wider mind share and new developers won't have to learn tooling to contribute to gluster. Thanks Raghavendra Talu

Re: [Gluster-devel] Request For Opinions: what to do about the synthetic statfvs "tweak"?

On Wed 21 Mar, 2018, 3:57 PM Csaba Henk, wrote: > Hi list, > > We have an ancient hack that fuse not > just passes on the statvfs data it's getting > from the storage, but tweaks it by setting > f_bsize / f_frsize to values of its own > preference. [1] > > The supposed

Re: [Gluster-devel] Locating blocker bugs for a release (and what is a blocker anyway)

, if the bug of interest is known > then looking at that bug in bugzilla provides the information, if the query > is more along what all are fixed, the release notes inform regarding the > same. > > As a result, marking all bugs against the track

Re: [Gluster-devel] Locating blocker bugs for a release (and what is a blocker anyway)

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Hi, > > Recently I was in some conversations that mentioned having to hunt for the > mail that announced the blocker bug for a release, when there is a need to > mark a bug as a blocker for that release. > > This

Re: [Gluster-devel] [heketi-devel] Nos vemos!

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Luis Pabon wrote: > Hi community, > It has been a great time working together on GlusterFS and Heketi these > past few years. I remember starting on Heketi to enable GlusterFS for > Manila, but now I will be moving on to work at Portworx and

Re: [Gluster-devel] Question regarding to gluster and vfs

you know why HAVE_SET_FSID is undefined in line https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/master/xlators/storage/posix/src/posix.c#L65 Thanks, Raghavendra Talur ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Change in test file, run only that test in regression job?

h with -H option. This does not determine if only tests have been added. It just makes sure we exit after running updated/added tests and don't run other tests. Nigel, you will have to check for "test only change* in jenkins and conditionally call run-tests.sh with -H [1] https://review.gluster.

Re: [Gluster-devel] Introducing minister

Adding gluster-devel On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Raghavendra Talur <rta...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Kubernetes and Openshift have amazing projects called minikube and > minishift which make it very easy to setup those distributed systems > for easy develo

Re: [Gluster-devel] brick multiplexing and memory consumption

On 21-Jun-2017 9:45 AM, "Jeff Darcy" <j...@pl.atyp.us> wrote: On Tue, Jun 20, 2017, at 03:38 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: Each process takes 795MB of virtual memory and resident memory is 10MB each. Wow, that's even better than I thought. I was seeing about a 3x difference

Re: [Gluster-devel] brick multiplexing and memory consumption

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Jeff Darcy <j...@pl.atyp.us> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017, at 08:45 AM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > > Here is the data I gathered while debugging the considerable increase in > memory consumption by brick process when brick mul

[Gluster-devel] brick multiplexing and memory consumption

Virtual memory data, resident memory is very nicely at 40 MB after 14 bricks. Thanks, Raghavendra Talur ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Gluster-devel] Glusterfs 3.10.3 has been tagged

/release-3.10/doc/release-notes/3.10.3.md Thanks, Raghavendra Talur NOTE: Tracker bug for 3.10.3 will be closed in a couple of days and tracker for 3.10.4 will be opened, and an announcement for 3.10.4 will be sent with the details ___ Gluster-devel mailing

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit submit type (was tests/bugs/gfapi/bug-1447266/bug-1447266.t)

show related changes to *enforce* submit order. However, with rebase if necessary it might. Nigel, would it be possible for you to setup a test server to try? Thanks, Raghavendra Talur [1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2016-January/047740.html > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10.2: Scheduled for the 30th of April

/release-3.10/doc/release-notes/3.10.2.md Thanks, Raghavendra Talur NOTE: Tracker bug for 3.10.2 will be closed in a couple of days and tracker for 3.10.3 will be opened, and an announcement for 3.10.3 will be sent with the details On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Raghavendra Talur <

[Gluster-devel] Is glusterd upgrade procedure idempotent?

is a idempotent operation which can be run before starting glusterd service in a container. Am I right? Thanks, Raghavendra Talur ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10.2: Scheduled for the 30th of April

by tomorrow. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447608 Thanks, Raghavendra Talur ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Don't allow data loss via add-brick (was Re: Add single server)

d fix the issue faster. Action item on Nithya/Atin to assign bug 1447608 to someone. I will wait for the fix for 3.10.2. Thanks, Raghavendra Talur > > Nithya >> >> Let's get a bug going, and not wait for someone to report it in bugzilla, >> and also mark it as blocking 3.

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10.2: Scheduled for the 30th of April

On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Raghavendra Talur <rta...@redhat.com> wrote: > We seem to have merged all the intended patches for 3.10.2 except for > one. While we wait for [1] to be merged, this is a last chance for > others to point out if any patch is missing.

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10.2: Scheduled for the 30th of April

announcement on 3rd May and we should have builds/packages ready by then. We will be tagging by tomorrow and performing a final test with packages before making the announcement. Thanks, Raghavendra Talur On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Raghavendra Talur <rta...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, >

[Gluster-devel] Release 3.10.2: Scheduled for the 30th of April

beyond bugs, please update the review, or leave a comment in the review, for me to pick it up Thanks, Raghavendra Talur [1] Release bug tracker: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.10.2 [2] 3.10 review dashboard: https://review.gluster.org/#/projects/glusterfs,dashboards

Re: [Gluster-devel] git pull failed!

Seems to be fixed now. On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Zhengping Zhou wrote: > Did anyone encount this problem when excute "git pull", this output is : > > > [zzp@42 gluster]$ git pull > ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host > fatal: Could

Re: [Gluster-devel] Is anyone else having trouble authenticating with review.gluster.org over ssh?

On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 9:07 PM, Raghavendra Talur <rta...@redhat.com> wrote: > I am not able to login even after specifying the key file > > $ ssh -T -vvv -i ~/.ssh/gluster raghavendra-ta...@git.gluster.org > OpenSSH_7.4p1, OpenSSL 1.0.2k-fips 26 Jan 2017 > debug1: Readi

Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.10 release and testing improvements

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Nithya Balachandran <nbala...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 2 February 2017 at 09:26, Nithya Balachandran <nbala...@redhat.com> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 1 February 2017 at 19:27, Raghavendra Talur <rta...@redhat

[Gluster-devel] 3.10 release and testing improvements

[1]. You can also find the list of tests [2]. I have filed only one issue in github[3] and that is the only blocker from testing perspective for this release. Thanks, Raghavendra Talur [1] Components and bad tests against them <-> afr 1 ec 1 gfapi 2 tier

Re: [Gluster-devel] Priority based ping packet for 3.10

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote: >> >> > The more relevant question would be with TCP_KEEPALIVE and >> > TCP_USER_TIMEOUT >> > on sockets, do we really need ping-pong framework in

Re: [Gluster-devel] static analysis updated

e add enough warning types into the list, we could turn voting on after a month. Jeff, would that work? Thanks, Raghavendra Talur > ___ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/glus

Re: [Gluster-devel] Ability to skip regression jobs?

f patches and made it possible to take all 4 in in one go, we could run tests only on top of these patches. The last time I checked, such a feature did not exist in Jenkins. Thanks, Raghavendra Talur > > -- > nigelb > > ___ > Glus

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] getting "Transport endpoint is not connected" in glusterfs mount log file.

On 11-Nov-2016 11:50, "Mohammed Rafi K C" wrote: > > Hi Abhishek, > > Could you please see if you are bricks are healthy or not, may be you can do a gluster volume status or you can look into the logs. If bricks are not running can you please attach the bricks logs in

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

On 10-Nov-2016 20:52, "Vijay Bellur" wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Manikandan Selvaganesh > wrote: > > Enabling/disabling quota or removing limits are the ways in which quota.conf > > is regenerated to the later version. It works

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > hi, > The only problem left was EC taking more time. This should affect > small files a lot more. Best way to solve it is using compound-fops. So for > now I think going ahead with the release is best. >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Possible problem introduced by http://review.gluster.org/15573

accounting for glfd and only refs were on fd_t. No, we don't need this additional reference. > > Can an fd returned by this function live more time than the associated > glfd in some circumstances ? > > Also could you please check if it is the second/subsequent fsync_async() >

Re: [Gluster-devel] relative ordering of writes to same file from two different fds

oblem than no-buffer io. it’s very common that a > local application will assume underlying file system to be. > further more, compatible to linux page cache will always to be a better > practice way, because there is a lot local applications that has already > rely on its semantics. > I

Re: [Gluster-devel] relative ordering of writes to same file from two different fds

Other cleanup:¬ - wb_file_t not required any more.¬ - wb_local_t not required any more.¬ - O_RDONLY fd's operations now go through the queue to make sure¬ writes in the requested region get fulfilled be -

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Heketi] Block store related API design discussion

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Prasanna Kalever wrote: > Hi all, > > This mail is open for discussion on gluster block store integration with > heketi and its REST API interface design constraints. > > > ___ Volume Request ... >

[Gluster-devel] Request to provide PASS flags to a patch in gerrit

pipeline to grow a lot and needing manual intervention. I recommend we disable this test for now. I request Kaushal to provide pass flags to the patch [2] for faster merge. [1] ./tests/features/lock_revocation.t [2] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15374/ Thanks, Raghavendra Talur

Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.9. feature freeze status check

wners: Kaushal, Pranith > > 6) RichACL support for GlusterFS: > Feature owners: Rajesh Joseph > > 7) Sharemodes/Share reservations: > Feature owners: Raghavendra Talur, Poornima G, Soumya Koduri, Rajesh > Joseph, Anoop C S > Feature won't make it for 3.9. Will target for next

[Gluster-devel] Automated Gluster setups using Vagrant and gdeploy

Hi all, I have blogged about using vagrant and gdeploy to create clusters of Gluster easily. Please have a look at http://blog.raghavendratalur.in/2016/08/automated-gluster-cluster-creation-for.html Thanks, Raghavendra Talur ___ Gluster-devel mailing

Re: [Gluster-devel] Reducing regression runs (hopefully)

> > > > > On the more ambitious side, I think we could also optimize around the > idea > > that some parts of the system aren't even present for some tests. For > > example, most of our tests don't even use GFAPI and won't be affected by > a > > GFAPI-only change. Conversely, GFAPI tests won't

Re: [Gluster-devel] Reducing regression runs (hopefully)

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: > > I have a few proposals to reduce this turn around time: > > > > 1. We do not clear the Verified tag. This means if you want to re-run > >regressions you have to manually trigger it. If your patch is rebased > on > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Reducing regression runs (hopefully)

> > > > 1. We do not clear the Verified tag. This means if you want to re-run >regressions you have to manually trigger it. If your patch is rebased > on top >of another patch, you may have to retrigger failing regressions > manually. > Yes, matching the settings for Verified flag to that

Re: [Gluster-devel] What tranpsort type in glfs_set_volfile_server() exactly mean ?

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Raghavendra Talur <rta...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Prasanna Kalever <pkale...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> Hey Team, >> >> >> My understanding is that @transport argumet in &

[Gluster-devel] Need feedback on vagrant based Gluster cluster creator

Hi All, Here is a patch for quick cluster creation of gluster. http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14930/ I need feedback on the features/design/implementation etc. I am currently planning to move these files to extras/devel-tools/ unless there is any other suggestion. Thanks, Raghavendra Talur

Re: [Gluster-devel] What tranpsort type in glfs_set_volfile_server() exactly mean ?

fetch. IMO, fetching volfile over rdma is an overkill and would not be required. RDMA should be kept only for IO operations. We should just remove it from the docs. Thanks, Raghavendra Talur > > Thanks, > -- > Prasanna > ___ Gluster-devel maili

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/basic/op_errnos.t failure

Nigel/Misc, Could you please look into this? slave29 does not seem to have a xfs formatted backend for tests. Thanks, Raghavendra Talur On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Avra Sengupta <aseng...@redhat.com> wrote: > Atin, > > I am not sure about the docker containers, but both t

[Gluster-devel] Weekly Community Meeting - 25/May/2016

/weekly_community_meeting_25may2016.2016-05-25-12.02.txt Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2016-05-25/weekly_community_meeting_25may2016.2016-05-25-12.02.log.html Next weeks meeting will be held at the same time. Thanks, Raghavendra Talur Meeting summary --- * Rollcall (rastar, 12:02:23

[Gluster-devel] Weekly Community Meeting - 18/May/2016

/weekly_community_meeting_18may2016.2016-05-18-12.06.txt Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2016-05-18/weekly_community_meeting_18may2016.2016-05-18-12.06.log.html Next weeks meeting will be held at the same time. Thanks, Raghavendra Talur Meeting summary --- * Rollcall (rastar, 12:07:08

Re: [Gluster-devel] Suggest a feature redirect

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Aravinda <avish...@redhat.com> wrote: > > regards > Aravinda > > On 05/19/2016 12:37 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbel...@redhat.com> wrote: > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Suggest a feature redirect

it is more of a request from a user it should a bugzilla RFE. >> If the user >> > requested on -devel list without a bug, then one of the community >> devs >> > should file a bug for it. >> > If it is a proposal for a feature with design >> details/implementation ideas >> > then a patch to glusterfs-specs is encouraged. >> >> >> In any case opening a discussion on gluster-devel would be ideal to >> get the attention of all concerned. >> >> -Vijay >> >> >> So should this stay on the website in the first place? >> - amye >> >> > Yes, the relevant workflow needs to be in the website. In the absence of > that, newcomers to the community might find it difficult to understand our > workflow. Currently it is Suggest a feature! which points to old wiki. Would it be better to have Suggest a feature there? Thanks, Raghavendra Talur > > > -Vijay > > > > ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Suggest a feature redirect

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote: > > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal < > humble.deva...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Amye, >> >> afaict, the feature proposal has start from glusterfs-specs ( >>

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Idea: Alternate Release process

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Kaushal M <kshlms...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Kaushal M <kshlms...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Raghavendra Talur <rta...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> > >>

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Idea: Alternate Release process

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Kaushal M wrote: > I'm in favour of a stable release every 2 months and an LTS once a > year (option 2). > +1 > > As Oleksander already suggested, I'm in favour of having well defined > merge windows, freeze dates and testing period. > (A

Re: [Gluster-devel] Reducing the size of the glusterdocs git repository

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Aravinda wrote: > +1 for Prashanth's approach. > +1 > regards > Aravinda > > On 05/18/2016 03:55 PM, Kaushal M wrote: > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Humble Devassy > Chirammal

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/performance/open-behind.t fails on NetBSD

r 3.7. Bug:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334204 Patch to mark test as bad in 3.7: http://review.gluster.org/14256 Thanks, Raghavendra Talur > > -- > Emmanuel Dreyfus > http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz > m...@netbsd.org > ___

Re: [Gluster-devel] Show and Tell sessions for Gluster 4.0

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > In the view of keeping the visibility of the work completed vs work in > progress and getting some fruitful feedback from the community we are > thinking of having a hangout/bluejeans session for 30-45 minutes once in

Re: [Gluster-devel] xlator option setting in gfapi

a volume wide option then glusterd or one of the REST interfaces for Glusterd should be used. I will also reply to the other thread with possible methods on overcoming the problem with write-behind and qemu. Thanks, Raghavendra Talur > regards, > Raghavendra > ___

Re: [Gluster-devel] State of 3.7 regression

the virt group volume set file. > Thanks, > Atin > > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Raghavendra Talur <rta...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I had sent a patch to backport all the test infra and test fixes to 3.7 >> branch from master.[1] >

[Gluster-devel] State of 3.7 regression

backport test fixes. Thanks, Raghavendra Talur [1]: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13683/ [2]: https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/16489/console [3]: https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/20348/console

[Gluster-devel] Weekly Gluster Community meeting 20-Apr-2016

/gluster_community_meeting_20-apr-2016.2016-04-20-12.01.txt - Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2016-04-20/gluster_community_meeting_20-apr-2016.2016-04-20-12.01.log.html Next week's meeting will be held at the same time. Thanks, Raghavendra Talur Meeting summary

Re: [Gluster-devel] Which test generates the core?

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > I am pretty sure that earlier we used to log the culprit test generating > the core. But now I don't see that same behavior in these runs [1] [2] > > [1] > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] On backporting fixes

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 03/16/2016 11:31 AM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > > Hi, > > Lot many fixes to tests were found to be not back ported to 3.7 and other > release branches. > This c

Re: [Gluster-devel] On backporting fixes

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:59 PM, Atin Mukherjee <atin.mukherje...@gmail.com > wrote: > -Atin > Sent from one plus one > > On 16-Mar-2016 11:32 am, "Raghavendra Talur" <rta...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Lot many fixes to

Re: [Gluster-devel] On backporting fixes

On Mar 17, 2016 7:50 AM, "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On 03/16/2016 11:46 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:

Re: [Gluster-devel] On backporting fixes

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Raghavendra Talur <rta...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Lot many fixes to tests were found to be not back ported to 3.7 and other > release branches. > This causes tests to fail only in those branches and leaves the > maintainers puzzl

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit trigger connection to jenkins not working

Root cause: I see the following error when I do "test connection" Connection error : com.jcraft.jsch.JSchException: java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Raghavendra Talur <rta...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I see that

[Gluster-devel] Gerrit trigger connection to jenkins not working

to trigger build from you. Thanks, Raghavendra Talur ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] How to cope with spurious regression failures

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Raghavendra Talur <rta...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus <m...@netbsd.org> wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 07:30:24PM +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote: >> > Any co

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Code-Review+2 and Verified+1 cause multiple retriggers on Jenkins

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Raghavendra Talur <rta...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 04:15:16PM +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote: >> > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 4

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Code-Review+2 and Verified+1 cause multiple retriggers on Jenkins

On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 04:15:16PM +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:34

Re: [Gluster-devel] How to cope with spurious regression failures

On Mar 3, 2016 7:42 AM, "Emmanuel Dreyfus" <m...@netbsd.org> wrote: > > Raghavendra Talur <rta...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > The tests passed on the first run itself, except for the NetBSD with > > "another test running on slave" error. > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] How to cope with spurious regression failures

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus <m...@netbsd.org> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 07:30:24PM +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > > Any comments before I merge the patch > http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13393/ ? > > The proposal has the merit of adr

[Gluster-devel] Gerrit search bookmarks that work in firefox too

*Patches that have passed all tests and are waiting for my review:* http://review.gluster.org/#/q/status:open+label:CentOS-regression%2B1+AND+label:NetBSD-regression%2B1+AND+label:smoke%2B1+AND+reviewer:self Thanks, Raghavendra Talur ___ Gluster-devel mailing

Re: [Gluster-devel] How to cope with spurious regression failures

Any comments before I merge the patch http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13393/ ? On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Raghavendra Talur <rta...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus <m...@netbsd.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at

[Gluster-devel] Gluster test infrastructure and current challenges

for different time zones. [1] https://plus.google.com/events/c25hcj9llrvvp3dcidqk26sjrhs Thanks, Raghavendra Talur ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster test infrastructure and current challenges

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Amye Scavarda <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Raghavendra Talur <rta...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> Hey folks, >> >> Gluster test infrastructure needs a bit of attention. We have committed

Re: [Gluster-devel] How to cope with spurious regression failures

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus <m...@netbsd.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 07:08:03PM +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > > a. Allowing re-running to tests to make them pass leads to complacency > with > > how tests are writt

Re: [Gluster-devel] Retrigger request: https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/18066/

On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Nithya Balachandran wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone please retrigger this regression? It has been aborted in the > middle of the run. > > Du had re-triggered centos and it is running now. Netbsd had failed for the same reason. I have

[Gluster-devel] Code-Review+2 and Verified+1 cause multiple retriggers on Jenkins

with a comment "run-all-regression" or something like that. Thoughts? Thanks Raghavendra Talur ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Code-Review+2 and Verified+1 cause multiple retriggers on Jenkins

On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:34:05PM +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We recently changed the jenkins builds to be triggered on the following > > triggers. > > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Different version of run-tests.sh in jenkin slaves?

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > Are we running a different version of run-tests.sh in jenkin slaves. The > reason of suspection is beacuse in last couple of runs [1] & [2] in > NetBSD I am seeing no failures apart from bad tests but the regression >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Different version of run-tests.sh in jenkin slaves?

ill update. On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Raghavendra Talur <rta...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Atin Mukherjee <amukh...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> Are we running a different version of run-tests.sh in jenkin slaves. The >> reaso

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Different version of run-tests.sh in jenkin slaves?

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukh...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 01/28/2016 12:00 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > > Ok, RCA: > > > > In NetBSD cores are being generated in /d/backends/*/*.core > > run-tests.sh looks only for &quo

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Patches for supporting lseek() with SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE available for review

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > Hi all, > > yesterday I have posted the latest version of a series that implements > support for lseek() with SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE. This functionality can > improve the handling of sparse files immensely. > > Please review

[Gluster-devel] Simple way to re-trigger jenkins jobs

comments above to trigger the job again. With this we will have time to follow proper process for getting jenkins account for developers. Thanks, Raghavendra Talur ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Gluster-devel] Smoke tests run on the builder in RH DC (at least)

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Michael Scherer wrote: > Hi, > > so today, after fixing one last config item, the smoke test jobs run > fine on the Centos 6 builder in the RH DC, which build things as non > root, then start the tests, then reboot the server. > Awesome!

Re: [Gluster-devel] Tips and Tricks for Gluster Developer

tedir=/var \ --sharedstatedir=/var/lib \ --mandir=/usr/share/man \ --infodir=/usr/share/info \ --libdir=/usr/lib64 \ --enable-debug make install On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Raghavendra Talur <rta...@redhat.com> wrote: > HI All, > > I am sure there are

Re: [Gluster-devel] Jenkins accounts for all devs.

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Michael Scherer <msche...@redhat.com> wrote: > Le vendredi 22 janvier 2016 à 11:31 +0530, Ravishankar N a écrit : > > On 01/14/2016 12:16 PM, Kaushal M wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Raghavendra Talur <

[Gluster-devel] Tips and Tricks for Gluster Developer

and add them to developer guide. Looking forward to be amazed! Thanks, Raghavendra Talur ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] heal hanging

lename " does is to scan the entire directory looking for strcasecmp(, ). If anything matches then it will return the . But the problem is the scan is costly. So I wonder if this is the reason for the CPU spikes. > > +Raghavendra Talur, +Poornima > > Raghavendra, Poornima, > When are

Re: [Gluster-devel] Linux regression tests are hanging too

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > Result: PASS > Build timed out (after 300 minutes). Marking the build as failed. > Build was aborted > Finished: FAILURE > > > https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/17664/console >

Re: [Gluster-devel] How to cope with spurious regression failures

> submissions (random prediction, as I used random input numbers, but you > > get the idea) > > > > Two solutions are proposed: > > > > 1) do not run unreliable tests, as proposed by Raghavendra Talur: > > http://review.gluster.org/13173 > > > > I h

Re: [Gluster-devel] Core from gNFS process

On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 2:25 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On 01/15/2016 08:38 AM, Soumya Koduri wrote: > >> >> >> >> On 01/15/2016 06:52 PM, Soumya Koduri wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 01/14/2016 08:41 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >>> On 01/14/2016 04:11 AM, Jiffin Tony Thottan

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Build system's voting for regression run

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > From: "Niels de Vos" > > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 09:56:54AM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > Hi Raghavendra, > > > > > > I noticed that for the below patches Gluster Build system hasn't

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Build system's voting for regression run

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 09:56:54AM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > Hi Raghavendra, > > > > I noticed that for the below patches Gluster Build system hasn't voted > > and hence the verified flag doesn't have an ack from it

[Gluster-devel] Core from gNFS process

Hi Jiffin and Soumya, Ravishankar told me about core generated by gNFS process during ./tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1140162-file-snapshot-features-encrypt-opts-validation.t. Here is console output: https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/17525/console And here is the

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] IMPORTANT: New jenkins triggering method

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Atin Mukherjee <atin.mukherje...@gmail.com> wrote: > -Atin > Sent from one plus one > On Jan 12, 2016 7:41 PM, "Niels de Vos" <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 07:21:37PM +0530, Raghavendra Talur

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Build system's voting for regression run

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 04:42:12PM +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Kaleb Keithley <kkeit...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > > &g

[Gluster-devel] IMPORTANT: New jenkins triggering method

, Raghavendra Talur ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Gluster-devel] Tests failing on Fedora

be good to document it. Thanks, Raghavendra Talur ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit review, submit type and Jenkins testing

On Jan 12, 2016 2:50 AM, "Niels de Vos" <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 12:46:09PM +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Kaushal M <kshlms...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 a

  1   2   >