- Original Message -
From: Emmanuel Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org
To: Anuradha Talur ata...@redhat.com, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
pkara...@redhat.com
Cc: gluster-devel@gluster.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 9:55:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] About split-brain-resolution.t
Anuradha Talur ata...@redhat.com wrote:
1) I send a patch today to revert the .t and send it again along with the fix.
Or...
2) Can this be failure be ignored till the fix is merged in?
We can ignore: NetBSD regresssion skips the test for now.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
On 03/30/2015 06:01 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 05:44:23PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
Problem here is that ' inode_forget' is coming even before it gets to
inspect the file. We initially thought we should 'ref' the inode when the
user specifies the choice and
On 03/30/2015 06:34 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkara...@redhat.com wrote:
Since spb_choice is not saved as an attribute for the file on the
bricks, it cannot be recovered when the context is reallocated. Either
that save feature has been forgotten, or going to
Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkara...@redhat.com wrote:
I see split-brain-resolution.t uses attribute replica.split-brain-choice
to choose what replica should be used. This attribute is not in
privilegied space (trusted. prefixed). Is it on purpose?
Yes, these are used as internal commands to
On 03/28/2015 09:51 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Hi
I see split-brain-resolution.t uses attribute replica.split-brain-choice
to choose what replica should be used. This attribute is not in
privilegied space (trusted. prefixed). Is it on purpose?
Yes, these are used as internal commands to make
Hi
I see split-brain-resolution.t uses attribute replica.split-brain-choice
to choose what replica should be used. This attribute is not in
privilegied space (trusted. prefixed). Is it on purpose?
While there, just in case someone has an idea on this: on NetBSD setting
this attribute is ignored.
