Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Fw: Re: Corvid gluster testing
On 08/07/2014 07:18 AM, Anand Avati wrote:
It would be worth checking the perf numbers without -o acl (in case it
was enabled, as seen in the other gid thread). Client side -o acl
mount option can have a negative impact on performance
. It is roughly 30% slower for the writes...
David
-- Original Message --
From: Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com
To: David F. Robinson david.robin...@corvidtec.com;
gluster-devel@gluster.org
Sent: 8/6/2014 12:48:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Fw: Re: Corvid gluster testing
Forgot to attach profile info in previous email. Attached...
David
-- Original Message --
From: David F. Robinson david.robin...@corvidtec.com
To: gluster-devel@gluster.org
Sent: 8/5/2014 2:41:34 PM
Subject: Fw: Re: Corvid gluster testing
I have been testing some of the fixes that
I have been testing some of the fixes that Pranith incorporated into the
3.5.2-beta to see how they performed for moderate levels of i/o. All of
the stability issues that I had seen in previous versions seem to have
been fixed in 3.5.2; however, there still seem to be some significant
On 08/06/2014 12:11 AM, David F. Robinson wrote:
I have been testing some of the fixes that Pranith incorporated into the
3.5.2-beta to see how they performed for moderate levels of i/o. All of
the stability issues that I had seen in previous versions seem to have
been fixed in 3.5.2; however,
hi Avati,
We checked this performance with plain distribute as well and on nfs
it gave 25 minutes where as on nfs it gave around 90 minutes after
disabling throttling in both situations. I was wondering if any of you
guys know what could contribute to this difference.
Pranith
On
On 08/07/2014 06:48 AM, Anand Avati wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
pkara...@redhat.com mailto:pkara...@redhat.com wrote:
We checked this performance with plain distribute as well and on
nfs it gave 25 minutes where as on nfs it gave around 90
On 08/07/2014 07:18 AM, Anand Avati wrote:
It would be worth checking the perf numbers without -o acl (in case it
was enabled, as seen in the other gid thread). Client side -o acl
mount option can have a negative impact on performance because of the
increased number of up-calls from FUSE for
