Re: [Gluster-devel] doubts in using gf_event/gf_msg

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Aravinda wrote: > It is possible to overload gf_lg/gf_msg to send events to local eventsd. > But we have to do additional parsing if we need to select the logs to > convert as events. If we introduce new API, then it is not different from >

Re: [Gluster-devel] doubts in using gf_event/gf_msg

Just resending in case you missed this mail. On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:31 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > hi Aravinda, >I was wondering what is your opinion in sending selected logs as > events instead of treating them specially. Is this something you guys >

[Gluster-devel] doubts in using gf_event/gf_msg

hi Aravinda, I was wondering what is your opinion in sending selected logs as events instead of treating them specially. Is this something you guys considered? Do you think it is a bad idea to do it that way? We can even come up with a new api which logs and then sends it as event. --