[Gluster-devel] Checklist for eventsapi component for upstream release

hi Aravinda, I think the existing tests should be good enough to test this functionality but I could be wrong. May be we should update https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-component-release-checklist if we need anymore things to be added. -- Aravinda & Pranith

[Gluster-devel] Checklist for snapshot component for upstream release

hi, Did you get a chance to decide on the tests that need to be done before doing a release for snapshot component? Could you let me know who will be providing with the list? I can update it at https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/ gluster-component-release-checklist -- Aravinda & Pranith

[Gluster-devel] Checklist for glusterfs packaging/build for upstream release

hi, In the past we have had issues where some of the functionality didn't work on debian/ubuntu because 'glfsheal' binary was not packaged. What do you guys as packaging/build maintainers on different distros suggest that we do to make sure we catch such mistakes before the releases are

[Gluster-devel] Checklist for ganesha FSAL plugin integration testing for 3.9

hi, Did you get a chance to decide on the nfs-ganesha integrations tests that need to be run before doing an upstream gluster release? Could you let me know who will be providing with the list? I can update it at https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/ gluster-component-release-checklist --

Re: [Gluster-devel] Checklist for smb integration testing for 3.9

. > > Thanks, > Raghavendra Talur > > On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 12:46 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < > pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> hi, >> Did you get a chance to decide on the smb integration tests that >> need to be run before doing an upstream gluste

[Gluster-devel] Anyone wants to maintain FreeBSD port of gluster?

hi, As per MAINTAINERS file this port doesn't have maintainer. If you want to take up the responsibility of maintaining the port please let us know how you want to go about doing it and what should be the checklist of things that should be done before every release upstream. It is extremely

[Gluster-devel] Checklist for Wireshark dissectors

Niels, Does wireshark also handle new fops like seek, compond, getactivelk, setactivelk FOPS? What are the other things that you check before the release? We can update more at https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-component-release-checklist -- Pranith

[Gluster-devel] Checklist for gluster-swift for upstream release

hi, Did you get a chance to decide on the gluster-swift integration tests that need to be run before doing an upstream gluster release? Could you let me know who will be providing with the list? I can update it at https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/ gluster-component-release-checklist

[Gluster-devel] Checklist for GlusterFS Hadoop HCFS plugin for upstream release

hi Jay, Are there any tests that are done before releasing glusterfs upstream to make sure the plugin is stable? Could you let us know the process, so that we can add it to https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-component-release-checklist -- Pranith

[Gluster-devel] Anyone wants to maintain Mac-OSX port of gluster?

hi, As per MAINTAINERS file this port doesn't have maintainer. If you want to take up the responsibility of maintaining the port please let us know how you want to go about doing it and what should be the checklist of things that should be done before every release upstream. It is extremely

Re: [Gluster-devel] Checklist for GlusterFS Hadoop HCFS plugin for upstream release

http://hadoop.apache.org> where we detail Hadoop interoperability > > > > On Sep 2, 2016, at 3:33 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkara...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > hi Jay, > Are there any tests that are done before releasing glusterfs > upstream to make sure the p

Re: [Gluster-devel] Checklist for snapshot component for upstream release

. Till the eventing test framework is integrated with the regression > suite, manual test of all 28 snapshot events. > > Regards, > Avra > > > On 09/03/2016 12:26 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > hi, > Did you get a chance to decide on the tests that nee

Re: [Gluster-devel] Checklist for gluster-swift for upstream release

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Prashanth Pai <p...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > - Original Message ----- > > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkara...@redhat.com> > > To: tdasi...@redhat.com, "Prashanth Pai" <p...@redhat.com> &

Re: [Gluster-devel] Checklist for gfapi for upstream release

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 12:10:41AM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > hi, > > I think most of this testing will be covered in nfsv4, smb > testing. > > But I could be wr

Re: [Gluster-devel] Post mortem of features that didn't make it to 3.9.0

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay < sankarshan.mukhopadh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:10 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri > <pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Do you think it makes sense to do post-mortem of features that > d

[Gluster-devel] Post mortem of features that didn't make it to 3.9.0

hi, Do you think it makes sense to do post-mortem of features that didn't make it to 3.9.0? We have some features that missed deadlines twice as well, i.e. planned for 3.8.0 and didn't make it and planned for 3.9.0 and didn't make it. So may be we are adding features to roadmap without

Re: [Gluster-devel] Is r.g.o down?

Okay, let's wait for it to be back up. The site was not at all loading a while back, now it at least says Service is temporarily unavailable. On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 3:44 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote: > > Not able to access it for the past 20 minutes. > > Looks down to me as well, and

Re: [Gluster-devel] Is r.g.o down?

Sorry about that. Missed this email. On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Michael Scherer <msche...@redhat.com> wrote: > Le vendredi 02 septembre 2016 à 03:39 +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri a > écrit : > > Not able to access it for the past 20 minutes. > > I am upgrad

[Gluster-devel] Is r.g.o down?

Not able to access it for the past 20 minutes. -- Pranith ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Status of block and object storage on gluster(integration with containers as well)

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:47 AM, Shyam <srang...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 08/31/2016 03:14 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > >> hi, >> I will be sending status of this work every week. This is first >> mail of this work. >> > > Thank yo

Re: [Gluster-devel] Is r.g.o down?

Worked fine, posted patch On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:32 AM, Michael Scherer <msche...@redhat.com> wrote: > Le vendredi 02 septembre 2016 à 00:40 +0200, Michael Scherer a écrit : > > Le vendredi 02 septembre 2016 à 03:39 +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri a > > écrit : >

Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.9. feature freeze status check

t;Prashanth Pai" <p...@redhat.com> <p...@redhat.com> > Cc: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkara...@redhat.com> <pkara...@redhat.com>, > "Rajesh Joseph" <rjos...@redhat.com> <rjos...@redhat.com>, "Manikandan > Selvaganesh"<msel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Query regards to heal xattr heal in dht

hi Mohit, How does dht find which subvolume has the correct list of xattrs? i.e. how does it determine which subvolume is source and which is sink? On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Mohit Agrawal wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to find out solution of one problem in dht

Re: [Gluster-devel] Query regards to heal xattr heal in dht

vol is source and rest of them are sink as we > are doing same in dht_dir_attr_heal. > I think first up subvol is different for different mounts as per my understanding, I could be wrong. > > Regards > Mohit Agrawal > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Pranith Kumar Kara

[Gluster-devel] Status of block and object storage on gluster(integration with containers as well)

hi, I will be sending status of this work every week. This is first mail of this work. We are enhancing these interfaces primarily for container storage - From gluster a container will be able to export a file as virtual block and will be used as private storage for that container,

Re: [Gluster-devel] release checklist for 3.9.0

I see updates only on NFS by Niels and no other component. Can we have some updates here please. It is difficult to make the release without these inputs. Please let me know if you need more time because you are busy with something. On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:09 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pk

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GlusterFS 3.9 release Schedule

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Aravinda wrote: > Hi All, > > Gluster 3.9 release Schedule > > Week of Sept 12-16 - Beta Tagging and Start testing > Week of Sept 19-23 - RC tagging > End of Sept 2016 - GA(General Availability) release of 3.9 > > Considering that beta

Re: [Gluster-devel] Review request for lock migration patches

> Thanks, > Susant > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Susant Palai" <spa...@redhat.com> > > To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowd...@redhat.com>, "Pranith Kumar > Karampuri" <pkara...@redhat.com> > > Cc: "gluster-dev

Re: [Gluster-devel] Need help with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224180

gt; Thanks and Regards, >> Sanoj >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Xavier Hernandez" <xhernan...@datalab.es> >> To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowd...@redhat.com>, "Sanoj Unnikrishnan" < >> sunni...@redhat.com

Re: [Gluster-devel] Changing Submit Type for glusterfs

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:25:01AM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > > > > The reason cherry-pick was chosen was to keep the branch linear and > > > > avoid merge-commits as (I'm guessing here) this makes the tree hard > to > > > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Developer Summit 2016 Talk Schedule

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Soumya Koduri wrote: > Hi Amye, > > Is there any plan to record these talks? > I had same question. > > Thanks, > Soumya > > On 09/15/2016 03:09 AM, Amye Scavarda wrote: > >> Thanks to all that submitted talks, and thanks to the program

Re: [Gluster-devel] logs/cores for smoke failures

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Nigel Babu <nig...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 01:13:15PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:52:45PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Nigel Babu <

Re: [Gluster-devel] RPC, DHT and AFR logging errors that are expected, reduce log level?

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > Hello, > > When NFS-Ganesha does an UNLINK of a filename on an inode, it does a > follow-up check to see if the inode has been deleted or if there are > still other filenames linked (like hardlinks) to it. > > Users are

Re: [Gluster-devel] Dht readdir filtering out names

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowd...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > - Original Message ----- > > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkara...@redhat.com> > > To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowd...@redhat.com>

Re: [Gluster-devel] Dht readdir filtering out names

rom non-hashed subvols corresponding to directories. > > Since the behaviour is different for different filesystem objects, dht > needs ia_type to choose its behaviour. > > ----- Original Message - > > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkara...@redhat.com>

[Gluster-devel] Dht readdir filtering out names

hi, In dht_readdirp_cbk() there is a check about skipping files without ia_type. Could you help me understand why this check is added? There are times when users have to delete gfid of the entries and trigger something like 'find . | xargs stat' to heal the gfids. This case would fail if we

[Gluster-devel] 'Reviewd-by' tag for commits

hi, At the moment 'Reviewed-by' tag comes only if a +1 is given on the final version of the patch. But for most of the patches, different people would spend time on different versions making the patch better, they may not get time to do the review for every version of the patch. Is it

Re: [Gluster-devel] Dht readdir filtering out names

essage - > > From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowd...@redhat.com> > > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkara...@redhat.com> > > Cc: "Shyam Ranganathan" <srang...@redhat.com>, "Nithya Balachandran" < > nbala...@redha

Re: [Gluster-devel] Dht readdir filtering out names

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowd...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > - Original Message ----- > > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkara...@redhat.com> > > To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowd...@redhat.com>

Re: [Gluster-devel] Dht readdir filtering out names

Does samba/gfapi/nfs-ganesha have options to disable readdirp? On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > What if the lower xlators want to set the entry->inode to NULL and clear > the entry->d_stat to force a lookup on the name?

Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression caused to gfapi applications with enabling client-io-threads by default

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Soumya Koduri wrote: > Hi, > > With http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15051/, performace/client-io-threads > is enabled by default. But with that we see regression caused to > nfs-ganesha application trying to un/re-export any glusterfs volume.

Re: [Gluster-devel] Query regards to heal xattr heal in dht

e correctness (leaving rebalance out of the > picture). > Yes, this seems fine. > > > >> >>Let me know if this approach is suitable. >> >> >> >> Regards >> Mohit Agrawal >> >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < &g

Re: [Gluster-devel] Multiplexing - good news, bad news, and a plea for help

Jeff, If I understood brick-multiplexing correctly, add-brick/remove-brick add/remove graphs right? I don't think the grah-cleanup is in good shape, i.e. it should lead to memory leaks etc. Did you get a chance to think about it? On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Jeff Darcy

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Heketi] Block store related API design discussion

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:06:00PM -0400, Luis Pabón wrote: > > Very good points. Thanks Prasanna for putting this together. I agree > with > > your comments in that Heketi is the high level abstraction API and it >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Heketi] Block store related API design discussion

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:31:11AM -0400, Luis Pabón wrote: > > Using qemu is interesting, but the I/O should be using the IO path of > QEMU block API. If not, > > TCMU would not know how to work with QEMU dynamic QCOW2

Re: [Gluster-devel] Fixing setfsuid/gid problems in posix xlator

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Soumya Koduri <skod...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 09/23/2016 08:28 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > >> hi, >>Jiffin found an interesting problem in posix xlator where we have >> never been using setfsuid/gid

[Gluster-devel] Fixing setfsuid/gid problems in posix xlator

hi, Jiffin found an interesting problem in posix xlator where we have never been using setfsuid/gid (http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15545/), what I am seeing regressions after this is, if the files are created using non-root user then the file creation fails because that user doesn't have

Re: [Gluster-devel] Fixing setfsuid/gid problems in posix xlator

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: > > Jiffin found an interesting problem in posix xlator where we have never > been > > using setfsuid/gid ( http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15545/ ), what I am > > seeing regressions after this is, if the files are created using

Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.9. feature freeze status check

Prasanna, Prashant, Could you add a short description of the features you are working on for 3.9 as well to the list? On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Pranith Kumar Kara

[Gluster-devel] 3.9. feature freeze status check

hi, Now that we are almost near the feature freeze date (31st of Aug), want to get a sense if any of the status of the features. Please respond with: 1) Feature already merged 2) Undergoing review will make it by 31st Aug 3) Undergoing review, but may not make it by 31st Aug 4) Feature

Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.9. feature freeze status check

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > hi, > Now that we are almost near the feature freeze date (31st of Aug), > want to get a sense if any of the status of the features. > I meant "want to get a sense of the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Events API: Adding support for Client Events

gt; Aravinda >> >> On 08/03/2016 09:19 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> >>> On 08/02/2016 11:24 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbel...@redhat.com >>>

Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.9. feature freeze status check

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowd...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > - Original Message ----- > > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkara...@redhat.com> > > To: "Rajesh Joseph" <rjos...@redhat.com>, "Manika

[Gluster-devel] release checklist for 3.9.0

hi, Could we have release checklist for the components? Please add the steps that need to be done before the release is made at this link: https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-component-release-checklist. This activity needs to be completed by 2nd September. Please also add if the tests

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit Access Control

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello folks, > > We have not pruned our Gerrit maintainers list ever as far as I can see. > We've > only added people. For security reasons, I'd like to propose that we do the > following: > > If you do not have a commit in

Re: [Gluster-devel] Brick multiplexing status

On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote: > For those who are interested, here's the current development status. > > The good news is that the current patch[1] works well enough for almost > all of the basic tests and 22/32 of the basic/afr tests to run >

[Gluster-devel] doubts in using gf_event/gf_msg

hi Aravinda, I was wondering what is your opinion in sending selected logs as events instead of treating them specially. Is this something you guys considered? Do you think it is a bad idea to do it that way? We can even come up with a new api which logs and then sends it as event. --

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] 'Reviewd-by' tag for commits

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 7:23 AM, Ravishankar N <ravishan...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 10/03/2016 06:58 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < > pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] 'Reviewd-by' tag for commits

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Ravishankar N <ravishan...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/30/2016 06:38 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 07:11:51AM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > hi, > At the moment 'Reviewed-by' tag comes only if a +1

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] 'Reviewd-by' tag for commits

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkara...@redhat.com > wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Ravishankar N <ravishan...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> On 09/30/2016 06:38 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] 'Reviewd-by' tag for commits

gt; > On October 3, 2016 3:58:32 AM GMT+02:00, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < > pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 7:23 AM, Ravishankar N <ravishan...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 10/03/2016 06:58 AM, Pranith Kum

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Migration complete

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 4:53 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Michael and I are happy to announce that the migration is now complete. > Both > > review.gluster.org and build.gluster.org are now

Re: [Gluster-devel] Fixing setfsuid/gid problems in posix xlator

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 08:44:14PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Jeff Darcy <jda...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > Jiffin found an inter

Re: [Gluster-devel] logs/cores for smoke failures

he logs like we do for regression runs? > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Ravishankar N <ravishan...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> On 09/27/2016 09:36 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: >> >> hi Nigel, >> Is there already a bug to capture these in the r

[Gluster-devel] Fixes for spurious failures in open-behind.t

hi, I found the following two issues and fixed them: Problems: 1) flush-behind is on by default, so just because write completes doesn't mean it will be on the disk, it could still be in write-behind's cache. This leads to failure where if you write from one mount and

[Gluster-devel] logs/cores for smoke failures

hi Nigel, Is there already a bug to capture these in the runs when failures happen? I am not able to understand why this failure happened: https://build.gluster.org/job/smoke/30843/console, logs/cores would have helped. Let me know if I should raise a bug for this. -- Pranith

Re: [Gluster-devel] logs/cores for smoke failures

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Nigel Babu <nig...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:00:40PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Nigel Babu <nig...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > These are gbench failure

[Gluster-devel] automating straightforward backports

hi, Nowadays I am seeing quite a few patches are straightforward backports from master. But if I follow the process it generally takes around 10 minutes to complete porting each patch. I was wondering if anyone else looked into automating this. Yesterday I had to backport

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

eview.gluster.org/#/c/15722/ > http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15714/ > http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15792/ > > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < > pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> hi, >> The only problem left was EC takin

[Gluster-devel] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

hi, The only problem left was EC taking more time. This should affect small files a lot more. Best way to solve it is using compound-fops. So for now I think going ahead with the release is best. We are waiting for Raghavendra Talur's http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15778 before going ahead

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] getting "Transport endpoint is not connected" in glusterfs mount log file.

that the mount is not > available to connect to both the bricks. > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < > pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> As per the logs, the mount is not able to connect to both the bricks. Are >> the connections fine? >>

Re: [Gluster-devel] Is it possible to turn an existing filesystem (with data) into a GlusterFS brick ?

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Saravanakumar Arumugam < > sarum...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 11/11/2016 06:03 PM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Is it possible to turn an existing filesystem (with data) into a GlusterFS brick ?

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Saravanakumar Arumugam wrote: > > > On 11/11/2016 06:03 PM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > >> L.S., >> >> I was wondering if it would be possible to turn an existing filesystem >> with data >> (ext4 with files en dirs) into a GlusterFS brick ?

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukh...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < > pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> I am trying to understand the criticality of these patches. Raghavendra's >> p

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukh...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < > pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> I am trying to understand the criticality of these patches. Raghavendra's >> p

[Gluster-devel] Need inputs for solution for renames + entry self-heal data loss in afr

One of the Red hat QE engineers (Nag Pavan) found a day 1 bug in entry self-heal where the file with good data can be replaced with file with bad data when renames + self-heal is involved in a particular way. Sample steps (From the bz): 1) have a plain replica volume with 2 bricks. start the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs for solution for renames + entry self-heal data loss in afr

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366818 is the bug I am referring to in the mail above. (Thanks sankarshan for pointing that I missed the link :-) ) On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > One of the Red hat QE engineers (

Re: [Gluster-devel] Input/output error when files in .shard folder are deleted

+Krutika On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 4:10 PM, qingwei wei wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently running a simple gluster setup using one server node > with multiple disks. I realize that if i delete away all the .shard > files in one replica in the backend, my application (dd) will

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Notice: https://download.gluster.org:/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST has changed

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:47 PM, Serkan Çoban wrote: > Hi, > Will disperse related new futures be ported to 3.7? or we should > upgrade for those features? > hi Serkan, Unfortunately, no they won't be backported to 3.7. We are adding new features to latest

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] gfid generation

gfid in either of this :-). > > > Thanks and Regards, > ram > -Original Message- > From: Kaushal M [mailto:kshlms...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 1:21 PM > To: Ankireddypalle Reddy > Cc: Pranith Kumar Karampuri; gluster-us...@gluster.org; Gluster Devel &g

Re: [Gluster-devel] Container Repo Change + > 50K downloads of Gluster Container images

That is very good news! On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Humble Devassy Chirammal < humble.deva...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Humble Devassy Chirammal < > humble.deva...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> We have kept our official Gluster Container images in Docker

Re: [Gluster-devel] Issue about the size of fstat is less than the really size of the syslog file

n of Raghavendra's patch. I tested it and it worked fine. We are still trying to figure out quick-read and readdir-ahead as I type this mail. > > Thanks a lots > > > > Best Regards, > > George > > > > *From:* Pranith Kumar Karampuri [mailto:pkara...@redhat.c

Re: [Gluster-devel] Issue about the size of fstat is less than the really size of the syslog file

aghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowd...@redhat.com>, "Raghavendra G" >>> > > > <raghaven...@gluster.com> >>> > > > Cc: Gluster-devel@gluster.org, "Jan Zizka (Nokia - CZ/Prague)" >>> > > > <jan.zi...@nokia.com>

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Test Thursday - Release 3.9

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkara...@redhat.com > wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Krutika Dhananjay <kdhan...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> Just finished testing VM storage use-case. >> >> *Volume configuration use

Re: [Gluster-devel] Issue about the size of fstat is less than the really size of the syslog file

hi George, It would help if we can identify the bare minimum xlators which are contributing to the issue like Raghavendra was mentioning earlier. We were wondering if it is possible for you to help us in identifying the issue by running the workload on a modified setup? We can suggest

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Test Thursday - Release 3.9

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta < gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Il 25 ott 2016 12:42, "Aravinda" ha scritto: > > > > Hi, > > > > Since Automated test framework for Gluster is in progress, we need help > from Maintainers and developers to

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Test Thursday - Release 3.9

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta < gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-10-28 12:32 GMT+02:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkara...@redhat.com>: > > No it is not completely valid. We will update it and announce the release > > sometime soon.

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Test Thursday - Release 3.9

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkara...@redhat.com > wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < > pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Krutika Dhananjay <kdh

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] 'Reviewd-by' tag for commits

> > Michael > > > - Original Message - > > > On 2016-09-30 at 17:52 +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 08:50:12PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote: > > > > > On 09/30/2016 06:38 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] 'Reviewd-by' tag for commits

Which review-tool do you suggest Michael? Any other alternatives that are better? Don't tell me email :-) On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 1:20 AM, Michael Adam wrote: > On 2016-10-14 at 11:44 +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:21:23PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > >

[Gluster-devel] Xavi documented how erasure coding algo works

Your comments are welcome @ http://review.gluster.org/15637 -- Pranith ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] 'Reviewd-by' tag for commits

gt; Niels > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:01:43PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Michael A

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] opportunist for outreachy

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Shyam wrote: > On 10/14/2016 10:48 AM, Manikandan Selvaganesh wrote: > >> Hi Soumya, >> >> Welcome to the community. >> >> Here[1] is the link for Gluster Documentation. I would suggest you to >> google and >> read a bit about GlusterFS and

Re: [Gluster-devel] 1402538 : Assertion failure during rebalance of symbolic links

ave the same type of file on both dht subvolumes? That will prevent unlink of regular file and recreate with the actual type of the file? > > Xavi > > > On 12/14/2016 09:02 AM, Xavier Hernandez wrote: > >> On 12/14/2016 06:10 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: >> >>&g

Re: [Gluster-devel] 1402538 : Assertion failure during rebalance of symbolic links

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Ashish Pandey wrote: > Hi All, > > We have been seeing an issue where re balancing symbolic links leads to an > assertion failure in EC volume. > > The root cause of this is that while migrating symbolic links to other sub > volume, it

Re: [Gluster-devel] What is the answer to the 3.9.1 release question?

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > Nothing? > > The reason I asked for 2 maintainers for the release is so that there will be load distribution. But unfortunately the pairing was bad, both of us are impacted by the same work which is leading to not

Re: [Gluster-devel] What is the answer to the 3.9.1 release question?

I am fine with it. Thanks Kaleb!! On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeit...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 01/06/2017 06:42 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Kaleb Keithley <kkeit...@redhat.com > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Get GFID for a file through libgfapi

Try getxattr for glusterfs.gfid.string may be? On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Ankireddypalle Reddy wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to extract the GFID for a file through libgfapi > interface. When I try to extract the value of extended attribute > glusterfs.gfid

Re: [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

Do we also plan to publish similar guidelines for deciding on Project maintainer? On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Michael Scherer <msche...@redhat.com> wrote: > Le samedi 18 mars 2017 à 16:47 +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri a écrit : > > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Amar

[Gluster-devel] Not able to compile glusterfs

hi, When I compile I get the following errors: EC dynamic support : x64 sse avx Use memory pools : yes Nanosecond m/atimes : yes file `cli1-xdr.tmp' already exists and may be overwritten file `changelog-xdr.tmp' already exists and may be overwritten file `glusterfs3-xdr.tmp' already

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >