On 06/19/2014 11:32 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
On 19/06/2014, at 6:55 PM, Benjamin Turner wrote:
snip
I went through these a while back and removed anything that wasn't valid for
GlusterFS. This test was passing on 3.4.59 when it was released, i am thinking
it may have something to do with a
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Benjamin Turner bennytu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yup,
On Jun 17, 2014 7:45 PM, Justin Clift jus...@gluster.org wrote:
On 17/06/2014, at 11:33 PM, Benjamin Turner wrote:
Here are the tests that failed. Note that n0 is a generated wname,
name255 is a 255
On 19/06/2014, at 6:55 PM, Benjamin Turner wrote:
snip
I went through these a while back and removed anything that wasn't valid for
GlusterFS. This test was passing on 3.4.59 when it was released, i am
thinking it may have something to do with a sym link to the same directory bz
i found
