Re: [Gluster-users] 3 Node Replicated Gluster set up as a ring - a good idea?

2015-02-15 Thread Ml Ml
Will i then get loop? Do i need SPF or something alike? Sorry, i meant STP (Spanning Tree Protocol). Cheers, Mario ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] 3 Node Replicated Gluster set up as a ring - a good idea?

2015-02-15 Thread Joe Julian
I think switches are much faster at their job than the kernel and avoiding their use may be a mistake. With regard to gluster, latency affects performance so if it's performance you're looking for, lowest latency switches would be wiser. If it's just network design you're asking for, this

[Gluster-users] 3 Node Replicated Gluster set up as a ring - a good idea?

2015-02-14 Thread Ml Ml
Hello List, i would like to build a 3 Node Cluster. I was thinking of such a setup: http://oi58.tinypic.com/2rfgghi.jpg My question: Can i set it up my network that way, that it will still work of one node fails? Just thinking about i want bonding and then i might even need a brige to bring