Re: [Gluster-users] Error logged in fuse-mount log file

Hi, Comments inline. Regards, Nithya On 9 November 2017 at 15:05, Amudhan Pandian wrote: > resending mail from another id, doubt on whether mail reaches mailing list. > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: *Amudhan P* > Date: Tue, Nov

Re: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS healing questions

Hi, You can set disperse.shd-max-threads to 2 or 4 in order to make heal faster. This makes my heal times 2-3x faster. Also you can play with disperse.self-heal-window-size to read more bytes at one time, but i did not test it. On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Xavi Hernandez

Re: [Gluster-users] BUG: After stop and start wrong port is advertised

Thanks. good to know. Met vriendelijke groet, Mike Hulsman Proxy Managed Services B.V. | www.proxy.nl | Enterprise IT-Infra, Open Source and Cloud Technology Delftweg 128 3043 NB Rotterdam The Netherlands | +31 10 307 0965 > From: "Atin Mukherjee" > To: "Mike

[Gluster-users] Error logged in fuse-mount log file

resending mail from another id, doubt on whether mail reaches mailing list. -- Forwarded message -- From: Amudhan P > Date: Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 6:43 PM Subject: error logged in fuse-mount log file To: Gluster Users

Re: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS healing questions

Hi Rolf, answers follow inline... On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Rolf Larsen wrote: > Hi, > > We ran a test on GlusterFS 3.12.1 with erasurecoded volumes 8+2 with 10 > bricks (default config,tested with 100gb, 200gb, 400gb bricksizes,10gbit > nics) > > 1. > Tests show that

[Gluster-users] GlusterFS healing questions

Hi, We ran a test on GlusterFS 3.12.1 with erasurecoded volumes 8+2 with 10 bricks (default config,tested with 100gb, 200gb, 400gb bricksizes,10gbit nics) 1. Tests show that healing takes about double the time on healing 200gb vs 100, and abit under the double on 400gb vs 200gb bricksizes. Is

Re: [Gluster-users] 回复： glusterfs segmentation fault in rdma mode

Hi, For segfault problem, Can you please give us more information like core dump as bent suggested, or/and log files, even reproducible methods will also help. For problem with Directory creation, It looks like the client A has some problem to connect with hashed subvolume. Do you have a

Re: [Gluster-users] Fwd: Ignore failed connection messages during copying files with tiering

Hi Paul, We need the log messages to help you further with this. Can you get us all the gluster logs and the output of gluster volume status and gluster volume info. and when the copy process seems to be suspended, i need the volume status at that time. The i would like to know what type of work

Re: [Gluster-users] Adding a slack for communication?

Great idea to have the slack channel +1 Cheers Erekle On 11/09/2017 08:59 AM, Martin Toth wrote: @Amye +1 for this great Idea, I am 100% for it. @Vijay for archiving purposes maybe it will be possible to use free service as https://slackarchive.io/ BR, Martin On 9 Nov 2017, at 00:09,

Re: [Gluster-users] Adding a slack for communication?

On 11/09/2017 09:05 AM, Sam McLeod wrote: On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Amye Scavarda > wrote: From today's community meeting, we had an item from the issue queue: https://github.com/gluster/community/issues/13

Re: [Gluster-users] Adding a slack for communication?

> > and for chat I've found that if IRC + a good web frontend for history/search > isn't enough using either Mattermost (https://about.mattermost.com/ > ) or Rocket Chat (https://rocket.chat/ > ) has been very successful. > +1 for

Re: [Gluster-users] file shred

> When I strace `shred filename`, it just seems to write + fsync random > values into the file based on some seed from /dev/urandom. Since these > are normal syscalls, and since gluster just sends these FOPS to the > bricks, it should work fine. > All caveats listed in `man shred` for the

[Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Poor performance of block-store with RDMA

Hi Kalever! First of all, I really appreciate your test results for block-store(https://github.com/pkalever/iozone_results_gluster/tree/master/block-store) :-) My teammate and I tested block-store(glfs backstore with tcmu-runner) but we have met a problem of performance. We tested some cases

Re: [Gluster-users] Adding a slack for communication?

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 04:15:17PM -0800, Amye Scavarda wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Jim Kinney wrote: > > The archival process of the mailing list makes searching for past issues > > possible. Slack, and irc in general, is a more closed garden than a public > >

Re: [Gluster-users] Adding a slack for communication?

> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Amye Scavarda > wrote: > From today's community meeting, we had an item from the issue queue: > https://github.com/gluster/community/issues/13 > > > Should we have a

Re: [Gluster-users] file shred

On 11/08/2017 11:36 PM, Kingsley Tart wrote: Hi, if we were to use shred to delete a file on a gluster volume, will the correct blocks be overwritten on the bricks? (still using Gluster 3.6.3 as have been too cautious to upgrade a mission critical live system). When I strace `shred

Re: [Gluster-users] Adding a slack for communication?

@Amye +1 for this great Idea, I am 100% for it. @Vijay for archiving purposes maybe it will be possible to use free service as https://slackarchive.io/ BR, Martin > On 9 Nov 2017, at 00:09, Vijay Bellur wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at

Re: [Gluster-users] glusterfs brick server use too high memory

On 8 November 2017 at 17:16, Yao Guotao wrote: > Hi all, > I'm glad to add glusterfs community. > > I have a glusterfs cluster: > Nodes: 4 > System: Centos7.1 > Glusterfs: 3.8.9 > Each Node: > CPU: 48 core > Mem: 128GB > Disk: 1*4T > > There is one Distributed Replicated

Re: [Gluster-users] Adding a slack for communication?

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Bartosz Zięba wrote: > It's great idea! :) > > But think about creating Slack for all RedHat provided opensource projects. > For example one Slack workspace with separated Gluster, Ceph, Fedora etc. > channels. > > I can't wait for it! > >