Re: [RFC] GTK+ 3 Migration - Alpha-grade Patchset

> On Feb 22, 2016, at 1:57 PM, Geert Janssens > wrote: > >> Major changes already in my tree: >> * All "rich" GtkActions/GtkRadioActions/GtkToggleActions were replaced >> by abstract GActions/GMenus. This doesn't sound like a lot, but is a >> major change. Please

Re: [RFC] GTK+ 3 Migration - Alpha-grade Patchset

> On Feb 22, 2016, at 9:56 AM, Tobias Markus wrote: > > On So, 2016-02-21 at 13:22 -0800, John Ralls wrote: >>> >>> On Feb 21, 2016, at 11:12 AM, Tobias Markus >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi GnuCash developers, >>> >>> over the last few feeks, I have developed a

Re: Patch : editing "Posted" time of transactions.

> On Feb 22, 2016, at 7:21 AM, gLETTERyYuMEANSj LETTERyOt > wrote: > > My patchset is not ready yet. > > After three weeks of intensive testing (without any crash :-), I > finally stumbled on a bug. > > That bug is that, when editing a transaction done

Re: [RFC] GTK+ 3 Migration - Alpha-grade Patchset

On Monday 22 February 2016 18:56:24 Tobias Markus wrote: > On So, 2016-02-21 at 13:22 -0800, John Ralls wrote: > > > On Feb 21, 2016, at 11:12 AM, Tobias Markus > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Tobias, > > > > That's a huge amount of work, but it's a bit too far-reaching to be

Re: [RFC] GTK+ 3 Migration - Alpha-grade Patchset

Hi Tobias, For some reason I missed your original announcement. Your reply to John made me find it. Anyway... First off, thanks for the effort you have spent so far to migrate gnucash to gtk+3. I gather this is a huge job (and the size of your branch confirms this). I agree with John we

Re: Reports chapter in guide

(Again I removed gnucash-user. No need to cross-post) On Monday 22 February 2016 18:32:03 Pedro Albuquerque wrote: > Hi Geert, all > > I'll think about a way to contribute more widely as soon as I solve my > "local" problems. But I most certainly don't want to raise a huge > discussion about the

Re: Reports chapter in guide

(I removed gnucash-user from the cc list) On Monday 22 February 2016 18:26:03 Pedro Albuquerque wrote: > Hi, > > About the merge, it's just an idea, thank you for your comment, I'll > think about that. > There has been another discussion recently [1] about merging the two documents together.

Re: Reports chapter in guide

Hi Geert, all I'll think about a way to contribute more widely as soon as I solve my "local" problems. But I most certainly don't want to raise a huge discussion about the merge. I'm trying to follow John's advices, after what I'll translate my idea and submit it as a bug. Starting there, we'll

Re: Reports chapter in guide

Hi, About the merge, it's just an idea, thank you for your comment, I'll think about that. About the other issue, like I said, there was a previous discussion about the use of GC in certain countries. It started, if I'm not mistaken, with a Swedish user and their tax authority imposing the

Re: [RFC] GTK+ 3 Migration - Alpha-grade Patchset

On So, 2016-02-21 at 13:22 -0800, John Ralls wrote: > > > > On Feb 21, 2016, at 11:12 AM, Tobias Markus > > wrote: > > > > Hi GnuCash developers, > > > > over the last few feeks, I have developed a fundamental patchset > > that > > should get GnuCash up and running in GTK+ 3.

Re: Reports chapter in guide

Hi, Pedro Albuquerque writes: > Platform independently speaking, I would rather have the help manual and > the guide merged into one single document and then split in two again, > one for personal finances and another for business finances. In my opinion, the Help and

Re: Patch : editing "Posted" time of transactions.

My patchset is not ready yet. After three weeks of intensive testing (without any crash :-), I finally stumbled on a bug. That bug is that, when editing a transaction done when the daylight settings is not the same as the time of edition, the date is going earlier and earlier. To enter a correct

Re: format-patch

> On Feb 21, 2016, at 11:46 PM, Chris Good wrote: > > Hi, > Re > http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Documentation_Update_Instructions#Step_13_Prepa > re_your_Patch : > > You can make patches of all commits between HEAD and the origin branch > pointer, which is usually what

Re: Reports chapter in guide

On Sunday 21 February 2016 08:21:16 Pedro Albuquerque wrote: > Hi again, > > I read the bugs you mentioned David, and all other bugs and > attachments related. And the wiki articles, and several Internet > pages John, thank you for pulling my ears. ;-) > Of course, I'm not aware of the new