Re: Reports: Utilization of urls

On Sunday 13 March 2016 18:49:33 Carsten Rinke wrote: > "several of your patches I did review and commit only to revert them > afterwards again" > I think that references the > - cashflow calculation issue, which the patch was later-on declared > "obsolete - not a bug, but misunderstanding of

Re: Reports: Utilization of urls

Hi Geert, "it is not a bug fix" From end user point of view I disagree, but I agree that this is not an item to waste energy on. "several of your patches I did review and commit only to revert them afterwards again" I think that references the - cashflow calculation issue, which the patch

Re: Reports: Utilization of urls

On Thursday 10 March 2016 18:58:56 Carsten Rinke wrote: > I have the same point of view regarding the categorization: > This is adding an optional representation mode to existing reports. > Not making up new reports. > This option is available already for the networth line chart (even > though

Re: Reports: Utilization of urls

Hi Frank, I have to admit, I am not sure if I get the point. "who knows, what will be in 2 years" certainly true, but if there is in option to add the fixes into master (more or less) now, why not adding it to maint, too? What will be the difference in 2 years? (note: I am refering to small

Re: Reports: Utilization of urls

Hallo Carsten, Am 10.03.2016 um 18:58 schrieb Carsten Rinke: > I have the same point of view regarding the categorization: > This is adding an optional representation mode to existing reports. Not > making up new reports. > This option is available already for the networth line chart (even >

Re: Reports: Utilization of urls

I have the same point of view regarding the categorization: This is adding an optional representation mode to existing reports. Not making up new reports. This option is available already for the networth line chart (even though differently implemented), so I rather see this a bug fix instead

Re: Reports: Utilization of urls

On Wednesday 09 March 2016 22:07:37 Geert Janssens wrote: > On Wednesday 09 March 2016 10:40:51 Derek Atkins wrote: > > John Ralls writes: > > >> On Mar 8, 2016, at 11:32 AM, Carsten Rinke > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> The difference is the line chart

Re: Reports: Utilization of urls

On Wednesday 09 March 2016 10:40:51 Derek Atkins wrote: > John Ralls writes: > >> On Mar 8, 2016, at 11:32 AM, Carsten Rinke > >> wrote: > >> > >> The difference is the line chart option for budget reports: it has > >> alrady been included on the master

Re: Reports: Utilization of urls

John Ralls writes: >> On Mar 8, 2016, at 11:32 AM, Carsten Rinke wrote: >> >> The difference is the line chart option for budget reports: it has >> alrady been included on the master branch, but not on the maint >> branch. >> I did a git pull today

Re: Reports: Utilization of urls

> On Mar 8, 2016, at 11:32 AM, Carsten Rinke wrote: > > The difference is the line chart option for budget reports: it has alrady > been included on the master branch, but not on the maint branch. > I did a git pull today again on both branches just to make sure I did not

Re: Reports: Utilization of urls

The difference is the line chart option for budget reports: it has alrady been included on the master branch, but not on the maint branch. I did a git pull today again on both branches just to make sure I did not miss anything. Regards, Carsten On 07.03.2016 23:42, John Ralls wrote: On Mar

Re: Reports: Utilization of urls

> On Mar 7, 2016, at 10:15 AM, Carsten Rinke wrote: > > Ok. > > I have submitted a patch for line charts in all reports (new Bug 763257, > currently only for maint) and simply commented out those parts which were > causing a warning message. > To be uncommented and

Re: Reports: Utilization of urls

Ok. I have submitted a patch for line charts in all reports (new Bug 763257, currently only for maint) and simply commented out those parts which were causing a warning message. To be uncommented and re-worked, once urls get re-introduced. Regards, Carsten On 07.03.2016 17:29, Geert

Re: Reports: Utilization of urls

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Carsten Rinke wrote: > when trying to introduce line charts to all graphical reports I run into > the effect, that warnings are thrown in the area of setting up urls for the > charts. > > I think that is to make the charts interactive, so

Re: Reports: Utilization of urls

On Monday 07 March 2016 11:08:50 Derek Atkins wrote: > Geert Janssens writes: > > GnuCash used to have interactive charts stem in the 1.x era. Back > > then it used an guppi to plot > > the charts. > > > > Guppi was replaced with goffice during the migration to gtk2

Re: Reports: Utilization of urls

Geert Janssens writes: > GnuCash used to have interactive charts stem in the 1.x era. Back then > it used an guppi to plot > the charts. > > Guppi was replaced with goffice during the migration to gtk2 (which > also started the 2.x series > of gnucash). I was not part

Re: Reports: Utilization of urls

On Monday 07 March 2016 07:10:07 Carsten Rinke wrote: > Hi, > > when trying to introduce line charts to all graphical reports I run > into the effect, that warnings are thrown in the area of setting up > urls for the charts. > > I think that is to make the charts interactive, so you can click on

Reports: Utilization of urls

Hi, when trying to introduce line charts to all graphical reports I run into the effect, that warnings are thrown in the area of setting up urls for the charts. I think that is to make the charts interactive, so you can click on lines and bars or account names in the legend to open the