Re: Reports chapter in guide

2016-02-22 Thread Geert Janssens
(Again I removed gnucash-user. No need to cross-post) On Monday 22 February 2016 18:32:03 Pedro Albuquerque wrote: > Hi Geert, all > > I'll think about a way to contribute more widely as soon as I solve my > "local" problems. But I most certainly don't want to raise a huge > discussion about the

Re: Reports chapter in guide

2016-02-22 Thread Geert Janssens
(I removed gnucash-user from the cc list) On Monday 22 February 2016 18:26:03 Pedro Albuquerque wrote: > Hi, > > About the merge, it's just an idea, thank you for your comment, I'll > think about that. > There has been another discussion recently [1] about merging the two documents together.

Re: Reports chapter in guide

2016-02-22 Thread Pedro Albuquerque
Hi Geert, all I'll think about a way to contribute more widely as soon as I solve my "local" problems. But I most certainly don't want to raise a huge discussion about the merge. I'm trying to follow John's advices, after what I'll translate my idea and submit it as a bug. Starting there, we'll

Re: Reports chapter in guide

2016-02-22 Thread Pedro Albuquerque
Hi, About the merge, it's just an idea, thank you for your comment, I'll think about that. About the other issue, like I said, there was a previous discussion about the use of GC in certain countries. It started, if I'm not mistaken, with a Swedish user and their tax authority imposing the

Re: Reports chapter in guide

2016-02-22 Thread Derek Atkins
Hi, Pedro Albuquerque writes: > Platform independently speaking, I would rather have the help manual and > the guide merged into one single document and then split in two again, > one for personal finances and another for business finances. In my opinion, the Help and

Re: Reports chapter in guide

2016-02-22 Thread Geert Janssens
On Sunday 21 February 2016 08:21:16 Pedro Albuquerque wrote: > Hi again, > > I read the bugs you mentioned David, and all other bugs and > attachments related. And the wiki articles, and several Internet > pages John, thank you for pulling my ears. ;-) > Of course, I'm not aware of the new