Adrien Monteleone writes:
> Yeah, those seem to be internal to the wiki, not an external broken
> link. But then, if the page itself isn’t changing, just the named
> anchor, it might not matter. The page still exists, so someone
> clicking an FAQ link from a mailing list message will still get
>
Yeah, those seem to be internal to the wiki, not an external broken link. But
then, if the page itself isn’t changing, just the named anchor, it might not
matter. The page still exists, so someone clicking an FAQ link from a mailing
list message will still get dropped into the same page, but if
I feel like MediaWiki also has a way to fix that, too, but it may only
work at a page level and not at an anchor level.
c.f. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Redirect
and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Section#Section_linking_and_redirects
-derek
On Tue, September 4, 2018 12:42 pm,
Broken links can be handled by permanent redirects in the web server’s
.htaccess file. I think Derek would be the one to add those in. If you compile
the list for him to copy & paste, I’m sure that would help. The end result is
someone can click the old link from the mailing list and the server
Frank,
I will begin with noting that I think that it was not entirely clear in my post
that I was presenting only the top-level headings for the FAQ in this email; I
was not prepared to re-align every level in the FAQ at this point.
> On Sep 4, 2018, at 4:02 PM, Frank H. Ellenberger
>
Hi David,
at first thanks for starting with this task.
Am 04.09.2018 um 16:43 schrieb David T. via gnucash-devel:
> Now, on a meta-level, I think the primary headings here might be better
> arranged as follows:
>
> 1. General Questions
Perhaps the title should be more specific. Abstract
About
> On Sep 4, 2018, at 7:43 AM, David T. via gnucash-devel
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am digging in to the FAQ page with an eye to rationalizing the accumulated
> mess. My hope is to make it easier for uers to find answers to their
> questions.
>
> Currently, the structure of the page does
Hello,
I am digging in to the FAQ page with an eye to rationalizing the accumulated
mess. My hope is to make it easier for uers to find answers to their questions.
Currently, the structure of the page does not accurately reflect the content of
the questions. For example, the section
