Re: [GNC-dev] Request of keeping a 2.6 branch still alive (Re: branch-2.6)

2018-06-02 Thread Geert Janssens
Op woensdag 30 mei 2018 22:31:03 CEST schreef Christian Stimming: > Am Dienstag, 29. Mai 2018, 06:56:44 schrieb John Ralls: > > > On May 29, 2018, at 5:04 AM, Geert Janssens > > > wrote: > > > > > > or at best on a branch that clearly shows it's not maintained by the > > > currently active

Re: [GNC-dev] Request of keeping a 2.6 branch still alive (Re: branch-2.6)

2018-06-02 Thread John Ralls
> On Jun 2, 2018, at 1:10 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: > > Op woensdag 30 mei 2018 22:31:03 CEST schreef Christian Stimming: >> Am Dienstag, 29. Mai 2018, 06:56:44 schrieb John Ralls: On May 29, 2018, at 5:04 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: or at best on a branch that clearly

Re: [GNC-dev] Request of keeping a 2.6 branch still alive (Re: branch-2.6)

2018-06-02 Thread Christian Stimming
Am Samstag, 2. Juni 2018, 08:16:35 schrieb John Ralls: > >> But why do we keep a "gnucash" repo at all and not only everyone's > >> personal > >> repository? Of course there is some sort of project belonging. My > >> proposal > >> is to still keep the 2.6 branch a little bit more alive, and one or

Re: [GNC-dev] Request of keeping a 2.6 branch still alive (Re: branch-2.6)

2018-06-02 Thread Adrien Monteleone
Folks, Perhaps my comments are not wanted, or out of place, but as an active user, someone who contributes a bit of assistance on the mailing list, and just someone who in general helps people less knowledgable with software selections and support, I have to ask, “Christian, did you consider

Re: [GNC-dev] Request of keeping a 2.6 branch still alive (Re: branch-2.6)

2018-06-02 Thread John Ralls
> On Jun 2, 2018, at 2:05 PM, Christian Stimming wrote: > > Am Samstag, 2. Juni 2018, 08:16:35 schrieb John Ralls: But why do we keep a "gnucash" repo at all and not only everyone's personal repository? Of course there is some sort of project belonging. My proposal is