Plutocrat wrote
> On a related note, it seems that as flatpak is available across all
> distributions, perhaps the way forward for gnucash, would be to make a
> single, gnucash-sanctioned flatpak version available that would run
> anywhere on any distribution, and just focus on keeping that up to
Originally I had typed ’simple’ in quotes and thought better of it. Certainly
no, it won’t be simple or easy. But I do hope by then, either myself or someone
else with nothing better to do will write a Cocoa native version. (or whatever
Mac is using at the time) I have to say though, the
> On Aug 22, 2018, at 3:41 PM, Adrien Monteleone
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 22, 2018, at 4:04 PM, GWB wrote:
>>
>>
>> Why is gnucash in the Gnome ghetto for program categories? Am I able
>> to run it in xfce because I already have the gnome dependencies
>> installed already?
>>
>
> That is
> On Aug 22, 2018, at 4:04 PM, GWB wrote:
>
>
> Why is gnucash in the Gnome ghetto for program categories? Am I able
> to run it in xfce because I already have the gnome dependencies
> installed already?
>
That is probably an historical artifact. You can run it in XFCE as that is
built on
No disagreement here on building from source. A PPA did exist for
GnuCash versions beyond the Ubuntu standard repo. That was
GetDeb.org. It went dark. If I had installed 3.x.x. from GetDeb and
I had to reinstall for some reason, building from source would be
about the only option (or perhaps
I’m not sure what you mean by ’not getting too far ahead of your distribution.’
I’ve successfully compiled and used 3.2 (and 2.6.17 and 2.6.19) on Ubuntu 16.04
which has 2.6.12 in its repo.
Unless you’re using a dedicated PPA (which doesn’t exist for GnuCash),
certainly changing repos to
I know at least one uses Fedora, so they won’t be building a .deb for you. (an
.rpm perhaps?)
But building a .deb package is what you’re going to find in a repository.
(Debian/Ubuntu/derivative repositories are collections of .deb packages)
3.2 has not made it out of Sid because of several
On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 at 22:59, GWB wrote:
> ..
> Alas, 18.10 ("Cosmic Cuttlefish") lists:
> gnucash (1:2.6.19-1)
Looking at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/cosmic/+package/gnucash-common
I see that version 3.2 is in the 'proposed' repository. I hope that
means that it is intended that 3.2 should
On 08/21/2018 08:32 PM, GWB wrote:
> Yes, thank you, I may try building from source. Has there ever been a
> standalone .deb package for GnuCash? I don't know what the flatpack
> is, but it occurs to me that for linux, debian, etc., a 3.x .deb might
> be worthwhile. But I don't think I have
Yes, thank you, I may try building from source. Has there ever been a
standalone .deb package for GnuCash? I don't know what the flatpack
is, but it occurs to me that for linux, debian, etc., a 3.x .deb might
be worthwhile. But I don't think I have seen a .deb package on the
download links at
On 08/21/2018 03:11 PM, GWB wrote:
> As Bert pointed out, if you can use Debian unstable, the version is 3.2:
>
> <<
> Source Package: gnucash (1:3.2-1)
> from https://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/gnucash
>
> Ironically, I usually find Debian unstable to be, in fact, more stable
> than the
As Bert pointed out, if you can use Debian unstable, the version is 3.2:
<<
Source Package: gnucash (1:3.2-1)
>>
from https://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/gnucash
Ironically, I usually find Debian unstable to be, in fact, more stable
than the "stable" version of some other distros. But
I'm not sure how the version history works in Ubuntu or Debian, but I
installed GnuCash 2.6.7 from getdeb.org quite a while ago, and
"pinned" it (so that apt-get upgrade would not go to the version up)
to that version hoping that gnucash in Ubuntu 14 would catch up with
2.6.7. Ubuntu 14 ("Trusty
Just curious... It has been almost a year since Gnucash was removed to
Debian testing.
It has (re)entered SID on 7/4, and there it sits...
Who is responsible for working on the "excuses" for why is stays in
SID: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gnucash, and has not migrated to
Testing?
Lincoln
> Message: 10
> Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 12:52:51 +0800
> From: Plutocrat
> To: "gnucash-user@gnucash.org"
> Subject: [GNC] Gnucash 3 in the Debian / Ubuntu pipeline?
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been trouble
I spoke too soon. 1:3.2-1 is now out in the unstable Debian repo.
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 12:52:51 +0800
Plutocrat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been troubled by the lack of Gnucash activity in Debian/Ubuntu
> repositories. I previously used getdeb, which went silent around
> September 2017. I tried
gnucash 1:3.0-1 has been available in the experimental Debian
repository for quite some time. Nothing more current though.
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 12:52:51 +0800
Plutocrat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been troubled by the lack of Gnucash activity in Debian/Ubuntu
> repositories. I previously used getdeb,
> On Jul 4, 2018, at 9:52 PM, Plutocrat wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been troubled by the lack of Gnucash activity in Debian/Ubuntu
> repositories. I previously used getdeb, which went silent around September
> 2017. I tried contacting the owners, but no reply. There was also an attempt
> on
Hi,
I've been troubled by the lack of Gnucash activity in Debian/Ubuntu
repositories. I previously used getdeb, which went silent around September
2017. I tried contacting the owners, but no reply. There was also an attempt on
Launchpad to provided more recent versions via a PPA, but that also
19 matches
Mail list logo
