Hi t3sserakt,
The documentation you linked at says that we groupchat needs nim >= 0.19,
but the project's README says >= 0.18...
I guess one of them should be fixed :-)
Best regards,
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020, 09:42 t3sserakt wrote:
> Hi Brendan,
>
> do you already know secushare.org?
>
> We are
Hi Brendan,
do you already know secushare.org?
We are working on a distributed private social network. Right now we
have a prototype implemented in nim-lang.org.
For trying it out have look here: https://gnunet.org/en/use.html#groupchat
We could start to expose a REST API that can be used by a
Thanks for the great summaries and links, Martin. Looking forward to
future developments with TNG, etc. And based on your comments on uPort,
which make a lot of sense to me, I am going to take a closer look at
Reclaim:ID.
Best,
Brendan
On 2/11/20 1:46 AM, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
> On 11. Feb 2020, at 05:59, Brendan Miller
> wrote:
>
> Thank you for your answers and encouragement, Martin.
>
> As a follow up, could you summarize your key thoughts on the shortcomings of
> IPFS relative to gnu:net?
The most obvious shortcoming is that IPFS only does file-sharing
Thank you for your answers and encouragement, Martin.
As a follow up, could you summarize your key thoughts on the
shortcomings of IPFS relative to gnu:net?
And what are your concerns/reservations about uPort? How would you
contrast their approach with that of Reclaim:ID?
Much appreciated!
Hi Brendan!
thank you for your interest in GNUnet.
In general I think you have the right ideas :)
One thing to node in general is that most of the technologies you are
significantly more
mature from a users perspective _because_ they do not address the whole stack.
IPFS otoh does a lot of
Hi, all. I am a web/web3 developer interested in helping to build open
source, private, decentralized alternatives to social platforms like
Facebook, WeChat, etc. I am coming from a technical starting point of
IPFS, Ethereum blockchain and secret contract platforms like Enigma and
Oasis, but I
