Hi Dan,
* Dan Mundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04. Jun. 2005]:
Found a problem!! Weird one though...
when setting key trust with enigmail for Thunderbird, the openpgp
management gives me an 'undefined error', but after this, it changes the
trust as if nothing went wrong. I even was the light
Oskar L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, let's say it is known that the characters in a passphrase has
been selected from the 64 ASCII characters A-Z, a-z, 0-9, # and $.
This will give each character an entropy of 6 bits (log2(64)), witch
if I understand correctly means that 6 of the 8 bits
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 11:36:32 +0200, Martin Geisler said:
I don't know how Outlook (not Express) handles things.
It won't be possible to verify a signature with Outlook due to the
fact that it is not possible to get to the raw MIME headers. It might
be possible to write a plugin which uses
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 13:45:30 +0200, Kiefer, Sascha said:
Well, as far as i see there is no difference between the MIME format of
rfc2015 and rfc3156.
Correct, 3156 has only minor clarifications.
So, what is right?
RFC like:
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5
Werner Koch schrieb:
The first of course.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
Okay, perfekt.
The PGP/MIME RFC states that you can first sign and then encrypt the mail.
In S/MIME it is allowed to first encrypt and then sign the message.
Do you think it's feasible to do the same in PGP/MIME? I think it
On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:16:54 +0200, Sascha Kiefer said:
The PGP/MIME RFC states that you can first sign and then encrypt the mail.
Doing this on the MIME level allows you to easily strip the encryption
layer while leaving the signature intact.
In S/MIME it is allowed to first encrypt and then
On Mon Jun 06 2005; 10:39, Peter Schott wrote:
Current running WinPT and the Outlook plugin. Those would be the only
programs I can think of that would be touching the keyring.
As I said, WinPT never writes the files directly. I heard about one or
two where something similar happened, but
