Hi all.
Seems someone is actively working on securing phones in an
user-effortless way...
http://www.techthefuture.com/technology/cyanogenmod-brings-system-wide-secure-messaging-to-android-phones
I've only had a quick look at it and something yet doesn't sound
right, but might be just an
Hello,
I'm using GPG regularly and did want to save my private key.
On the IRC channel someone linked me to paperkey :
http://www.jabberwocky.com/software/paperkey/
While this project is really interseting, it does not fit my needs.
I found (http://point-at-infinity.org//)
Hi,
you may want to check out
http://blog.gnupg.org
which has more infos on the upcoming campaign. Sorry, for all that
Javascript stuff.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
___
Gnupg-users
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 20:37, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
I think it's a good idea. It's a vital piece of information if you actually
The majority of users are using a GUI and thus the command line version
does not matter at all. Although people should know better, I am pretty
sure that there
Le 13/12/2013 15:34, Werner Koch a écrit :
Hi,
you may want to check out
http://blog.gnupg.org
which has more infos on the upcoming campaign. Sorry, for all that
Javascript stuff.
Hello Werner
A lot of good news currently in the free software crypto area :) :
* impressive roadmap news
On 13/12/13 15:37, Werner Koch wrote:
The majority of users are using a GUI and thus the command line
version does not matter at all.
I suppose when those people have questions they go the mailing list of
the GUI in question, but still, since there is an amount of more-or-less
newbies coming
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:05, christophe.bro...@cnamts.fr said:
* a very lean and clean GnuPG blog design :) and excellent promotional video !
I was somehow able to convice Sam not to install Wordpress like blogging
software right now. Which also means that for comments you need to
resort to
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:04, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
Has it ever been researched in which way users use GnuPG? A part of the
GUI users might also still use the command line for certain things.
My guess is that the majority of GnuPG users are not aware that they are
using GnuPG. They see
Am Fr 13.12.2013, 15:37:59 schrieb Werner Koch:
The majority of users are using a GUI and thus the command line version
does not matter at all.
Strange argument IMHO. Would you say the same about Linux? 99% of the desktop
users don't know that there is a shell / console layer thus it's not
On 12/13/2013 02:09 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
I estimate that not more than 1% of all GnuPG users are using gpg in the
shell.
this sounds like an argument for being willing to change the
human-readable output on the shell -- there are not many people looking
at it anyway, and most of those people
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 21:05, mailinglis...@hauke-laging.de said:
Maybe. But it is trivial to check whether gpg runs as part of a script, isn't
it? It already does so today. I have forgotten where it is done but some
Huh? It is impossible without using a lot of heuristics and knowledge of
the
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 21:24, d...@fifthhorseman.net said:
this sounds like an argument for being willing to change the
human-readable output on the shell -- there are not many people looking
at it anyway, and most of those people are sophisticated user.
It is a Unix tool and people want to have
Hi, I think this is my first post to this list, but I've been a lurker
for a bit.
This campaign looks pretty awesome. I tweeted the video and it's getting
some pickup: https://twitter.com/micahflee/status/411569314097934336
I hope you don't mind a bit of feedback.
On 12/13/2013 10:57 AM, Werner
Hi, I think this is my first post to this list, but I've been a lurker
for a bit.
This campaign looks pretty awesome. I tweeted the video and it's getting
some pickup: https://twitter.com/micahflee/status/411569314097934336
I hope you don't mind a bit of feedback.
On 12/13/2013 10:57 AM, Werner
On 12/13/2013 04:27 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 21:24, d...@fifthhorseman.net said:
I think for a piece of critical security infrastructure, GPG has been
supporting some insecure practices for far too long.
Why do you think this is insecure? Because gpg does not encrypt to a
Hi,
Is it possible to create a revocation certificate just for sub keys and
not the master key?
This would be useful for offline master keys. Trusted persons could be
given the revocation certificate for sub keys and send it to key servers
when they suspect compromise. But should the sub key
Am Fr 13.12.2013, 22:56:07 schrieb adrelanos:
Hi,
Is it possible to create a revocation certificate just for sub keys and
not the master key?
--edit-key 0x12345678
key 1
revkey
Hauke
--
Crypto für alle: http://www.openpgp-schulungen.de/fuer/unterstuetzer/
17 matches
Mail list logo
