On Mon 2018-09-24 01:09:25 +0100, Andrew Luke Nesbit wrote:
> This is using the contents of `~/.gnupg/private-keys-v1.d/` as an API.
> If this is *not* part of the API, then what *is* the official
> recommendation for generating subkeys?
The part of those pages about "generating subkeys" does use
Hi there,
On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 at 16:19:22 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> But the real question is: why do you need this, and what do you intend
> to do with it?
I believe it was a follow up to https://bugs.debian.org/903163, messages
≥160 in particular. TL;DR: for smartcard usage
On 23/09/2018 22:19, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> [...], if you're looking to export a specific key for transfer into
> any other implementation (including other versions of GnuPG). This is
> not only "acceptable" but it is normal, standardized, and widely
> interoperable.
I'm sorry, I did a
On 24.09.2018 02:09, Andrew Luke Nesbit wrote:
> This is using the contents of `~/.gnupg/private-keys-v1.d/` as an API.
> If this is *not* part of the API, then what *is* the official
> recommendation for generating subkeys?
I'm not in a position to suggest "official" recommendations but one
