Management of background services with systemd

I am researching GnuPG for my employer. We will stick with the old release series 2.2 at first, because few Linux distributions package 2.3 or 2.4 yet. However, I'm studying newer versions and recent developments to ease our future upgrades. In doing so, a question has arisen: should background

RE: GNUPG and Google Cloud

, David From: C.J. Collier Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2022 10:23 AM To: David Gordon Cc: gnupg-users@gnupg.org Subject: Re: GNUPG and Google Cloud Hi there! Are you looking for a server-less solution or will a Debian instance on GCE or GKE suffice? You can "deploy" GNUPG with apt-get.

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

em. If I try to search on hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com, there's no problem as well. But If I try to search on hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com or hkp(s)://keys.openpgp.org, I'm getting: C:\Users\David>gpg --keyserver hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com --search-keys opensuse gpg: error searching keyse

Short question regarding config

Hi all, What's the difference between `|--personal-cipher-preferences' and `default-preference-list'?| |What ends up in the exported keys? | | | |Thanks!| |- Mihai | ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org

Re: Short question regarding config

Sorry for the formatting errors. Regards, - Mihai ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Best practices for obtaining a new GPG certificate

. Dave. On 3/18/21, Werner Koch wrote: > On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:06, David Mehler said: > >> My existing GPG certificate is going to expire in less than a month. >> I'd like to know current best practices for obtaining a new one? In > > Do you really want a new one? Usually

Best practices for obtaining a new GPG certificate

Hello, My existing GPG certificate is going to expire in less than a month. I'd like to know current best practices for obtaining a new one? In particular I'm looking for the best protocol and strength for a security not a performance stance. The certificate will mainly be used for verifying and

Re: Plan B - Who carries the torch?

On 1/5/21 8:24 AM, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:27:14AM -0500, Jean-David Beyer via Gnupg-users wrote: Building a web of trust is so hopeless, from my point of view, that I have abandonned gnupg. I have made keys for myself, obtained enigmail for my Firefox browser

Re: Plan B - Who carries the torch?

igmail. So for me, it is pointless. -- .~. Jean-David Beyer /V\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey /( )\ Red Hat Enterprise Linux ^^-^^ up 4 days, 13 hours, 37 minutes ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/list

Re: Certified OpenPGP-encryption after release of Thunderbird 78

s (more than 1.000), except for 5 V3-keys. I can definitely say > that it's not just broken, and it can import keys. [snip] How does one identify a v3 key? David OpenPGP_0xE334A5C93AE58BA6.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP di

Re: GnuPG website docs

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 3:55 AM Werner Koch wrote: > > I added some notices but I am not sure what to suggest as replacement. > Vielen Dank. My guess is that the HOWTOs won't be updated anytime soon, so this might be the best you can do for the time being.

GnuPG website docs

ntation, please see ..." 2. "HOWTOs" should be moved to a lower spot in the Documentation menu on the website. -David ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: are angle brackets around email address allowed for auto-key-locate?

On Wed, 2019-10-16 at 20:26 +0200, David Hebbeker wrote: > On Wed, 2019-10-16 at 14:19 +0200, Werner Koch wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 22:23, David Hebbeker said: > > > The manual [1] says that GnuPG can automatically retrieve keys > > > for emails in the &q

Re: are angle brackets around email address allowed for auto-key-locate?

On Wed, 2019-10-16 at 14:19 +0200, Werner Koch wrote: > On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 22:23, David Hebbeker said: > > The manual [1] says that GnuPG can automatically retrieve keys for > > emails in the "u...@example.com" form. Does this exclude emails > >

Re: We have GOT TO make things simpler

roof. I had a realistic uncle who used to say, "You can always design a system to be fool-proof; but if you do, a damned-fool will come along. -- .~. Jean-David Beyer /V\ PGP-Key:166D840A 0C610C8B /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey ^^-^^ 15:45:01 up 13 days, 21:19, 2 users, load average:

Re: "There's always light..........."

confuse gpg/gpg2 :) All I want to do is add a comment in site-admin "The captain's (B)log" open and closed brackets (B)Log confuse gpg/2 even more. Being a bit "eccentric" da...@gbenet.com "One Flew Over the Cookoo's Nest" would be good :) Would the --comment command

"There's always light..........."

keys - can I add a comment? If so what is the command?? Cheers David -- People Should Not Be Afraid Of Their Government - Their Government Should Be Afraid Of The People - When Injustice Becomes Law, REBELLION Becomes A DUTY! Join the Rebellion Today! The "Captain's B(L)og"

Re: looking for assistance tracking down why i don't have the ability to run gpg from the command line

.gpg folder and copy that to a USB. You can do a weekly backup to USB. Then you can add it to whatever you want - but be in root to change the ownership to whatever the users called. when I do a --list-users t lists all my 186 keys :) David -- People Should Not Be Afraid Of Their Governme

Re: Difficulty of fixing reconciliation

signed by 150,000 people or more?? How can you meet 150,000 people? Your going to spend your entire waking hours getting your key signed by as many people as possible before you die? The mind boggles! David -- People Should Not Be Afraid Of Their Government - Their Government Should Be Afraid O

Re: PGP Key Poisoner

ing you knowledge which you may not be aware of". Well, > some knowledge was brought to you via GitHub, so enjoy. :-) > > -Ralph > > ___ > Gnupg-users mailing list > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users > Thank you Ral

Re: PGP Key Poisoner

ommon knowledge for years - it's new to me and many thousands of pgp users. Many thousands of people got infected - and had no thought to back up their king rings and have to start all over again. Just because one can develop a nuclear bomb - it proves real stupidity to drop it on an unsuspecting p

Re: allow-non-selfsigned-uid issue with key from keys.openpgp.org that contains no identity information

? Keyservers should have strict rules on public keys - all to have a valid email a validation email sent back - then confirmed and that public key is then available. No identity available - simple - reject the key. Users of gpg that want to create weird and wonderful keys need to keep them on

skipped packet 12

Hello, Do you have any ideas why am getting multiple lines of: gpg: skipped packet of type 12 in keybox Thanks David -- People Should Not Be Afraid Of Their Government - Their Government Should Be Afraid Of The People - When Injustice Becomes Law, REBELLION Becomes A DUTY! Join the Rebellion

Re: Enigmail

Andrew Gallagher: > On 31/07/2019 13:36, David wrote: >> Enigmail always defaults to the first set of keys one created > > Enigmail will default to the first set of keys in your keyring that > matches the selection criteria. Do you have more than one ID on each > key? Do y

Re: Enigmail

Patrick Brunschwig: > On 31.07.2019 13:46, David wrote: >> Hello Erich, >> >> I did what you said - associated each email address with it's own key. >> I then shut down Thunderbird re-started and carried out the following test: >> >> Test One: >> &g

Re: Enigmail

Patrick Brunschwig: > On 31.07.2019 08:56, David wrote: >> Patrick Brunschwig: >>> On 31.07.2019 00:36, David wrote: >>>> Andrew Gallagher: >>>>> >>>>>> On 30 Jul 2019, at 18:47, David wrote: >>>>>> >>>>&

Re: Enigmail

David: > Erich Eckner via Gnupg-users: >> Hi David, >> >> here is, how I had thunderbird + enigmail running for several years with >> two keys and without problems (I have switched away from thunderbird >> since one year ago, because it got too heavy and slow for

Re: Enigmail

Erich Eckner via Gnupg-users: > Hi David, > > here is, how I had thunderbird + enigmail running for several years with > two keys and without problems (I have switched away from thunderbird > since one year ago, because it got too heavy and slow for my taste): > > For ea

Re: Enigmail

became really usable.) > > > ___ > Gnupg-users mailing list > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users > Ok two years out - thank you for the correction David -- People Should Not Be Afraid Of Their Gove

Re: Enigmail

Patrick Brunschwig: > On 31.07.2019 00:36, David wrote: >> Andrew Gallagher: >>> >>>> On 30 Jul 2019, at 18:47, David wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello Stefan, >>>> >>>> I have three email accounts with their own ke

Re: Enigmail

ters - clearly some people wish to make conversations rather than offering practical help - this failure was what prompted me to look into other solutions. David -- People Should Not Be Afraid Of Their Government - Their Government Should Be Afraid Of The People - When Injustice Becomes L

Re: Enigmail

Andrew Gallagher: > >> On 30 Jul 2019, at 18:47, David wrote: >> >> Hello Stefan, >> >> I have three email accounts with their own keys - Enigmail does not >> support this - you have to have one key and that's it. > > That is simply not true. I used

Re: Enigmail

Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users: > David wrote: > > Hi David, > >> I have three email accounts with their own keys - Enigmail does not >> support this - you have to have one key and that's it. > > Ah, o.k. I never tried it, but it should be possible, with different

Re: Enigmail

your comments are just like a bad fart - then they go away. You don't think perhaps can not think - your not too smart as to offer any solution. Regards David -- People Should Not Be Afraid Of Their Government - Their Government Should Be Afraid Of The People - When Injustice Becomes La

Re: Enigmail

Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users: > David wrote: > >> Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users: >>> David wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Everyone, >>>> >>>> I am looking for an alternative to Enigmail - which fails to work. >>>> Any ideas as

Re: Enigmail

Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users: > David wrote: > >> Hello Everyone, >> >> I am looking for an alternative to Enigmail - which fails to work. >> Any ideas as to a suitable replacement?? > > You may check out another MUA, like Claws-Mail, which I used with > G

Enigmail

Hello Everyone, I am looking for an alternative to Enigmail - which fails to work. Any ideas as to a suitable replacement?? Regards David -- People Should Not Be Afraid Of Their Government - Their Government Should Be Afraid Of The People - When Injustice Becomes Law, REBELLION Becomes A DUTY

Web Key Directory

Hello All, If I create a folder on my server WKSDirectory" then upload my public keys to it - and then give the: https//gbenet.com/wksdirectory - will this do for my key retrieval? They then just pick the public key they want to download? It's uncomplicated :) David -- People S

Re: new to GPG: "gpg: Fatal: zlib inflate problem: invalid code lengths set"

as a size of 68 KB, could that be the culprit ? > > Bernd > The simpe rules are as follows: (1) You encrypt to another persons public key (2) You decrypt with your private key That's it! You can sign your emails - this means no one can tamper with them whilst in transit - if it was tampere

Re: WKD: Publishing a key for multiple user IDs

On 16/07/2019 08:23, Wolfgang Traylor wrote: > Try the gpg-wks-client command. It should try to automatically strip the user > IDs. Werner Koch explained that in an old post: > https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2019-February/061610.html > > Since my primary secret key is offline and

Re: WKD: Publishing a key for multiple user IDs

Thanks everybody. > > Is there documentation somewhere how to produce the keys for both these > > user IDs with GnuPG? (I don’t think the Python generate scripts do this > > I don't known about Python scripts. Kmail, GpgOL, and Enigmail do the > publishing for you. You can also do it

WKD: Publishing a key for multiple user IDs

on somewhere how to produce the keys for both these user IDs with GnuPG? (I don’t think the Python generate scripts do this properly, or do they?) Cheers, -- David signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gn

Re: test

On 14/07/2019 05:55, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote: > David wrote: > >> Hello Stefan, >> >> I mean to say - no keys were found :) > > Maybe you have to adjust you settings. > > My key is available via WKD or Hagrid. > > (P.S. I forgot

Re: test

On 13/07/2019 17:56, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote: > Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote: > > David wrote: > >>>> Just testing my e-,ails are getting through :) >>>> >>>> But not signed :) no public key >>>> >>>>

Re: test

On 13/07/2019 17:45, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote: > David wrote: > >> Just testing my e-,ails are getting through :) > >> But not signed :) no public key > >> David > > And a little reply, to see if my signature verifies properly. > > Step 1

Re: Testing WKD setup?

On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 09:59:32PM +0300, Teemu Likonen wrote: > Can't answer to those questions but I got your key via WKD and with the > kye verified your email. So, this test was success. Well, in that case thank you for checking, Teemu! signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Testing WKD setup?

Hello list, I have implemented WKD for my domain, but now I don’t know an easy way of testing it … is there a service or similar where I can check if this email address is properly WKD-enabled? Thank you. -- David signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: SKS and GnuPG related issues and possible workarounds

circulation. If in deed that's the case - that person can download any public key insert malicious code and upload to any key server. I am not updating any keys and no sks key servers. Who's new to the mailing list? Now we have a web of distrust :( David -- People Should Not Be Afraid Of Thei

test

Just testing my e-,ails are getting through :) But not signed :) no public key David -- People Should Not Be Afraid Of Their Government - Their Government Should Be Afraid Of The People - When Injustice Becomes Law, REBELLION Becomes A DUTY! Join the Rebellion Today! https://gbenet.com

Re: New keyserver at keys.openpgp.org - what's your take?

On 02/07/2019 03:44, Mirimir via Gnupg-users wrote: > On 07/01/2019 07:29 AM, David wrote: > > > >> My take on all this is that I have had to disable Enigmail because it's >> screwed - I was not able to send mail and all the settings in enigmail >> were lots

Re: New keyserver at keys.openpgp.org - what's your take?

gt; http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users > My take on all this is that I have had to disable Enigmail because it's screwed - I was not able to send mail and all the settings in enigmail were lots of so I have been infected :( Dav

Re: Your Thoughts

GUI that makes installation easy - but only geeks use it :) I try to promote user encryption on my website (it's down at this time) but very very few people take their daily lives seriously. David -- People Should Not Be Afraid Of Their Government - Their Government Should Be Afraid Of The

Your Thoughts

Your Thoughts :) https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2014/08/13/whats-matter-with-pgp/ -- People Should Not Be Afraid Of Their Government - Their Government Should Be Afraid Of The People - When Injustice Becomes Law, REBELLION Becomes A DUTY! Join the Rebellion Today! https://gbenet.com

Re: Enforcing password complexity for private keys

Indeed it’s specified in the OpenPGP card specs. I have my answers Thanks David > On Apr 30, 2019, at 14:13, Juergen Bruckner wrote: > > Well I may be (partly) wrong, but I guess a 6digit PIN-Code on the > GnuPG-Card may be complex enough for the most security settings. > &

Re: Enforcing password complexity for private keys

Believe me we have long and passionate discussions about passwords length and complexity. The question in my post is purely technical. > On Apr 30, 2019, at 13:51, Michał Górny wrote: > >> On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 13:40 -0400, David Milet wrote: >> Yes, we’re considering

Re: Enforcing password complexity for private keys

developers will choose the weakest password the system allows, making them the weakest link. > On Apr 30, 2019, at 13:21, Juergen Bruckner wrote: > > Hello David, > > have you ever thought about using SmartCards? > GnuPG has a built in SmartCard service. > > regards >

Enforcing password complexity for private keys

! David ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Generating revocation certificate

A, ELG, DSA Cipher: 3DES, CAST5, BLOWFISH, AES, AES192, AES256, TWOFISH, CAMELLIA128, CAMELLIA192, CAMELLIA256 Hash: MD5, SHA1, RIPEMD160, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512, SHA224 Compression: Uncompressed, ZIP, ZLIB, BZIP2 -- .~. Jean-David Beyer /V\ PGP-Key:166D840A 0C610C8B /( )\ Shrewsbu

Re: Newbie: Installing Build Dependencies to gnupg-2.2.13 update from gnupg 2.0.22 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS failed

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 23:16, Oscar Carlsson via Gnupg-users wrote: > > And in future emails, try to [...] use pastebin like > services and/or attach logs instead of adding them inline like this. Why is that suggested? If someone posts hundreds of kilobytes or more, I agree, but in this case I

Re: [paperkey] Always output "interrupt"

On Jun 20, 2018, at 11:28 AM, Damien Cassou wrote: > > David Shaw writes: >> Which version of paperkey is this? > > both the version from source and from Fedora package are 1.5. > >> If that doesn't resolve your problem, can you send me a sample secret >&

Re: [paperkey] Always output "interrupt"

urse - just generate a dummy one) that exhibits the problem? I'll make it work. David ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: [Announce] [security fix] GnuPG 2.2.8 released (CVE-2018-12020)

velopment of GnuPG is mostly financed by donations. >> The GnuPG project currently employs one full-time developer and one >> contractor. Both work exclusively on GnuPG and closely related software >> like Libgcrypt, GPGME, and GPA. We are planning to extend our team >> ag

Re: Break backwards compatibility already: it’s time. Ignore the haters. I trust you.

e protected from that 90 volt ringing current. Can you imagine the redesign that would be required so I could start the gasoline engine in my Prius with a hand crank in the front? -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ PGP-Key:166D840A 0C610C8B Registered Mac

Re: Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME

o) thunderbird-52.7.0-1.el6_9.x86_64 gnupg2-2.0.14-8.el6.x86_64 Enigmail 2.0.4 -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ PGP-Key:166D840A 0C610C8B Registered Machine 1935521. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jerseyhttp://linuxcounter.net ^^-^^ 09:40:01 up 2 days, 17:30, 2 users

Re: GnuPG 2.2.4 on Windows - problems accessing some HKPS keyservers

Thanks, Phil - I appreciate your help and your response. Thanks, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 23, 2018, at 9:51 PM, Phil Pennock wrote: > > Looks to me like a GnuPG bug. In fact, it looks very much like > https://dev.gnupg.org/T1447 which has been marked

GnuPG 2.2.4 on Windows - problems accessing some HKPS keyservers

Good Evening - I'm running GnuPG 2.2.4 on Windows. I'm able to successfully query the SKS keyserver pool via HKPS (hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net) with no problems. I'm trying to query the hkps://keys.mailvelope.com keyserver, and I'm not having any luck. I suspect I don't have the

Re: your message could not,be delivered to one or more recipients.

.com. 126866 IN A 64.12.51.132 dns-02.ns.aol.com. 126866 IN A 205.188.157.232 dns-07.ns.aol.com. 126866 IN A 64.236.1.107 dns-06.ns.aol.com. 126866 IN A 207.200.73.80 ;; Query time: 123 msec ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) ;; WHEN:

your message could not,be delivered to one or more recipients.

y later. __ >From where does it get port 451? My SMTP port is 465 204.29.186.9 is my ISP for e-mail: AOL. -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ PGP-Key:166D840A 0C610C8B Registered Machine 1935521. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jerseyhttp://linuxcounter

Re: GnuPG public key vulnerability?

s://www.yubico.com/keycheck/ There has been some discussion of the implications of this vulnerability on this list. Search the list archives for "ROCA" to see more. The original paper is at https://crocs.fi.muni.cz/public/papers/rsa_ccs17 David

gpg-agent UI when waiting for smart card touch?

Hi, I'm using gpg-agent with Yubikeys configured to require a physical touch before performing operations. Is there any way to get gpg-agent to display something on screen when it's waiting for me to touch the Yubikey? (Otherwise, I sometimes don't realize it's waiting for anything, and the

Help: Copied gnupg folder not recognised

he "GnuPG keys" pane of "GNOME Password and Keys" is empty * Email client is not able to encrypt/decrypt messages How can I diagnose what the problem is? Failing that, how can I export/import an entire .gnupg folder (including trust data)? Regards, David [1] https://

Unknown key type

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Can someone please explain why I am getting a yellow bar on a LOT of signed msgs saying that the key type is unknown?? the exact msg is "Part of the message signed with unknown key; the key type is not supported by your version of GnuPG" I am

Re: suspicious key found

ot match, as there is no (current) way to forge an entire fingerprint. See https://evil32.com - they made the keys as a demonstration, but didn't upload them. It's an excellent demonstration why people should never trust the short key ID for anything. David __

Re: Subkey Generation / SmartCard

gpg card ready to go in a automated way https://github.com/bourinus/gpg_SmartCard_generation Hope this helps, Best rgds, david On 14/04/2017 20:47, Christoph J wrote: > I am trying to batch provision yubikeys. > > Using the --batch, I can generate the initial key, but I

Re: Problems with cert validation via CRL

ert, but I will dig into that. Thanks again for your help - it's very much appreciated! Sent from my Mobile Device > On Feb 21, 2017, at 9:31 PM, NIIBE Yutaka <gni...@fsij.org> wrote: > > Hello, again, > > David Gray <d...@davidegray.com> wrote: >> dave@dave-Virt

RE: Problems with cert validation via CRL

er Lebbing [mailto:pe...@digitalbrains.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 10:13 AM To: David Gray <d...@davidegray.com>; NIIBE Yutaka <gni...@fsij.org> Cc: gnupg-users@gnupg.org Subject: Re: Problems with cert validation via CRL On 21/02/17 13:20, David Gray wrote: > I'm n

Re: Problems with cert validation via CRL

I get home I'll check it out and report back. Really appreciate the help, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 21, 2017, at 10:13 AM, Peter Lebbing <pe...@digitalbrains.com> wrote: > >> On 21/02/17 13:20, David Gray wrote: >> I'm no expert, but when I look at the debug i

Re: Problems with cert validation via CRL

et the CRL (or the associated .db file in crl.d) to see if that is the issue? I appreciate your help very much. Thanks, Dave Sent from my Mobile Device > On Feb 20, 2017, at 9:32 PM, NIIBE Yutaka <gni...@fsij.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > David Gray <d...@davidegray.com> wr

Problems with cert validation via CRL

Hello - new user here; this may be an obvious question but I haven't been able to find the answer. Ultimately, this may just highlight some of the problems inherent in a hierarchical trust model. I've got a free x.509 email certificate generated by Comodo. I've got Ubuntu 16.04 LTS

Re: Counterarguments Supporting GnuPG over Off The Record (OTR)

unication, and without paper communication, we will be unable to encrypt anything. Will there be an equivalent to OpenPGP that works with telepathy? -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ PGP-Key:166D840A 0C610C8B Registered Machine 1935521. /( )\ Shrewsbury, N

Re: Trust signature domain

ample: example.com becomes: <[^>]+[@.]example\.com>$ Can you post the actual user IDs of the keys you are testing with (or a similar example.com set) so I can try them as well? David ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Gpg key lost in self update

On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 14:15:52 + Christoffer Stjernlöf wrote: > do...@mail.com writes: > > I used a config file (hand written), and concatenated several of it's > > lines to form a super long strong passphrase for my key. > > There is no way to crack an arbitrary private key.

Re: What are those attachments you have on your email?

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Stephan Beck <st...@mailbox.org> wrote: > Sorry, David, for arriving a bit late to the party..., I had to answer > Peter who had addressed several list mails in reply to mine yesterday > and it took me a while. > Yes, as Brian says, the veri

Re: configure warnings and errors upon ./configure for Pinentry v0.9.7

eeling I'm not out of the woods quite yet but that's ok. I appreciate you guys helping me work through this gpg software. I still have lots of questions about what kind of questions I should have but that will come. David ___ Gnupg-users mailing list G

Re: configure warnings and errors upon ./configure for Pinentry v0.9.7

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:16 AM, Werner Koch wrote: > >> configure: error: No pinentry enabled. > > You need to install the appropriate development package for the GUI > platform. > > > Salam-Shalom, > >Werner > > -- > Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein

Re: configure warnings and errors upon ./configure for Pinentry v0.9.7

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Stephan Beck wrote: > Ah, I forgot one thing: you have to add the following to your ~/.bashrc > file: > GPG_TTY=$(tty) > export GPG_TTY > > Does it work now? > > HTH > > Stephan Stephan I updated the .bashrc file in my home directory, still got

Re: configure warnings and errors upon ./configure for Pinentry v0.9.7

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Stephan Beck <st...@mailbox.org> wrote: > Hi, > > David Adamson: > > If you only want to use the command line (i.e. text mode) and do not > need a GUI, you'll probably need the pinentry-curses package. Install it > by typing: sudo apt-

Re: configure warnings and errors upon ./configure for Pinentry v0.9.7

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:16 AM, Werner Koch wrote: >> configure: error: No pinentry enabled. > > You need to install the appropriate development package for the GUI > platform. I looked for a GUI platform but had no idea what it's called where to find it and why I need a GUI if

Re: configure warnings and errors upon ./configure for Pinentry v0.9.7

Thanks Krzysztof. I did apt-get install pinentry-qt4 although it was an older (0.8.3-2) version than what is on gnupg . org. It installed without any errors but when I run gpg2 --gen-key I'm still getting: We need to generate a lot of random bytes. It is a good idea to perform some other action

configure warnings and errors upon ./configure for Pinentry v0.9.7

Hello, I'm running a debian Jessie v8 kernel release 3.16.0-4-amd64 on my personal laptop. It came pre-installed with GnuPG 1.4.18. I went to generate keys for myself by typing: gpg2 --gen-key But then during the process got this error: gpg: agent_genkey failed: No pinentry Key generation

Re: gpg2 --version gpg: Fatal: libgcrypt is too old (need 1.7.0, have 1.6.3)

Running ldconfig as root resolved the issue I was having! Now when I type gpg2 --version in a new shell it reports the following: gpg (GnuPG) 2.1.15 libgcrypt 1.7.3 Thanks for the help. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org

Re: gpg2 --version gpg: Fatal: libgcrypt is too old (need 1.7.0, have 1.6.3)

That worked thank you but only for that session and I read that it's generally not good practice to make that path permanent. Are you proposing I do this every time I wish to use gpg2? Is this behavior expected in a successful installation or what did I do wrong and can I fix it? Thanks again.

gpg2 --version gpg: Fatal: libgcrypt is too old (need 1.7.0, have 1.6.3)

Hello, I'm running a debian Jessie v8 kernel release 3.16.0-4-amd64 on my personal laptop. It came pre-installed with GnuPG 1.4.18. Rightly or not I thought having the latest version was a good idea for no other reason than wanting to have the latest and greatest. So from gnupg.org download page

Need Help decrypt HTML E-mail using OutlookPrivacyPlugin

ready for printing. Any clue as to how I get this to work is welcome. Thank-you in advance! David j. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: File Encrypted with Primary key

e-only algorithm). My advice would be to try workaround B first. If they're using the same engine that I saw before, it was smart enough to handle that case and would properly use the subkey. David ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: gpg-preset-passphrase not working with 2.1

On 14 July 2016 at 07:29, David Matthews <davidmatthew...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13 July 2016 at 13:13, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> wrote: >> Hi David-- >> >> On Tue 2016-07-12 16:46:53 +0200, David Matthews wrote: >>> I can't get gpg-

Re: gpg-preset-passphrase not working with 2.1

On 13 July 2016 at 13:13, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> wrote: > Hi David-- > > On Tue 2016-07-12 16:46:53 +0200, David Matthews wrote: >> I can't get gpg-preset-passphrase to work with GnuPG 2.1.7. > > there have been significant changes to GnuPG betwee

gpg-preset-passphrase not working with 2.1

I can't get gpg-preset-passphrase to work with GnuPG 2.1.7. The command appears to work successfully but the passphase is not found by GET_PASSPHRASE. I've included details of my simple test below plus the output from running it on Centos 7.2 (where it works using 2.0.22) and Fedora 23 (where it

gpg-preset-passphrase not working with 2.1

eset-passphrase does not work". Have I understood that correctly? If so I assume I will see the same issue with the latest release? Any advice much appreciated. My setup relies on using gpg-preset-passphrase so I'll need to install 2.0 for the moment unless I can get this working. Thanks, D

Re: Remove photos from OpenPGP key in the keyservers

ictly additive. Once you add something, the servers have no means to remove them. The most you can do is revoke those photos (like you'd revoke a user ID). That does not remove them, but at least marks them as no longer intended. David ___ Gnupg-users

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >