On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 04:10:34PM +0200, Stefan Claas wrote:
> Vincent Breitmoser wrote:
>
> >
> > > Maybe you can consider in the future at least to allow CA sigs.
> > > Those would be only one sig per key and the CA signing keys
> > > could be stored in your database as reference as well.
> >
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 08:17:38PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 06:20, robb...@gentoo.org said:
>
> > Presently, the code is effectively this:
> > ...cat-list-of-fingerprints... | xargs gpg --recv
> >
> > This has the downside of causing many execs.
>
> Right after a clean
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 12:50:06PM +0100, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 03/11/17 06:20, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > Presently, the code is effectively this:
> > ...cat-list-of-fingerprints... | xargs gpg --recv
> >
> > This has the downside of causing many exec
...
> Any
What's a reasonably efficient way to fetch a lot of keys, by
fingerprint, from keyserver pools with HKPS?
Presently, the code is effectively this:
...cat-list-of-fingerprints... | xargs gpg --recv
This has the downside of causing many execs.
As an alternate, it was suggested that I could do
Not sure if such things exist already, but hopefully they do, and
somebody could point me to them...
To go into a little more detail, I'd like to examine the WoT as it
exists between Gentoo developers, and try to work out a reasonable way
to close it for resurrecting our long-dead keyring.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 05:41:11PM -0700, Harry wrote:
Hello guys,
I ran into a problem when using gpg to sign and encrypt. I have a test
run below (in bash):
Not really 100% usable yet, but the correct solution to this is the
server mode accessed via --command-fd.
IIRC VERIFY and MESSAGE
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 08:54:26PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=~~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~~=
19:41 (sabato), David Pic?n ?lvarez:
When in doubt, use brute force. So, the answer is, it depends on the
strenght of your passphrase.
--David.
So if the strenght of passphrase is something
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 07:55:55PM +0200, Johan Wevers wrote:
Well, I'm able to do some tests now with old backup CD's. All my old
backups are still perfectly readable, the oldest being from February
1998. I'll keep testing.
With modern equipment, not burning discs with maximum speed seems
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 07:37:01PM +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:55, Christoph Probst said:
It seems as if Gentoo applies a gnupg-1.9.20-fbsd.patch to a gnupg
Can you please post this patch? Or if it is long send it to
gnupg-hackers at gnupg.org.
As one of the Gentoo
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 03:21:42AM -0600, Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote:
[8] IMPORT somebody ELSE'S key and sign it; Werner's signing
key for example.
$ cd $TO_WHERE_WERNERS_PUB_KEY_IS
$ sha1sum WernerKoch.asc
c151479c9231455f18bccd09e3423679683a9ba9 WernerKoch.asc
# It
10 matches
Mail list logo
