On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 04:10:34PM +0200, Stefan Claas wrote: > Vincent Breitmoser wrote: > > > > > > Maybe you can consider in the future at least to allow CA sigs. > > > Those would be only one sig per key and the CA signing keys > > > could be stored in your database as reference as well. > > > > > > Currently 3 CAs come to mind: Governikus, Heise and CAcert. > > > > Interesting thought! I would be a bit worried about slipping into a > > gatekeeper role, but at least there are no technical issues with this. > > Thanks for your reply! I think this would be also appreciated > by the CAs, in case they decide later to run your key server > software as well, or for companies etc. whishing to having their > own CA and using your key server software too. Yes, from the perspective of Gentoo Linux, we've recently spun up dedicated keyservers intended for @gentoo.org keys only. And being able to include our own CA for approved signatures would fit well with future plans.
-- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
