ns and goes beyond email already today; and it's
designed from the very beginning on to support other crypto as well
(agnosticism on messaging & crypto).
--
p≡p foundation: https://pep.foundation/
0xCB5738652768F7E9.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Descriptio
Subject:
GPA errors when creating key pair
Date:
Fri, 1 Feb 2019 09:03:54 +0100
From:
Roland Siemons (P
Dear List,
I am trying to help somebody to set up GPG4Win. He uses Win10. Trying to
create a new key pair using GPA, GPA returns: "The GPGME library
returned an unexpected
error at gpagenkeyadvop.c:163. The error was: Invalid argument"
How can this be resolved?
Greetz,
--
Roland Siemons
> Message-ID: <20181029031830.ga24...@kugelfisch.zuhause.test>
>
> Roland Siemons (P) at Fri., 2018-10-12:
>
>> 3/ Assisted remotely by some of you, I was able to sort out a very
>> strange problem with decryption. The solution was found by manipulating
>> my key from inside the
Dear GnuPG experts,
1/ Thanks and compliments to those who make GnuPG possible!
2/ I am a very ordinary end-user who unfortunately cannot fall back to
computer experts easily in his vicinity. One of those for whom forum
assistance and manuals are very important.
3/ Assisted remotely by some of
Dear Werner,
Thanks for yr advise.
This is what I get, following yr suggestion:
##
gpg : gpg: public key is 1594F1502D7EF3B9
At line:1 char:1
+ gpg -vd -o C:\Users\Roland\Desktop\Bagger\1.pdf
Dear Werner,
Thanks for yr advise.
This is what I get, following yr suggestion:
##
gpg : gpg: public key is 1594F1502D7EF3B9
At line:1 char:1
+ gpg -vd -o C:\Users\Roland\Desktop\Bagger\1.pdf
Dear GNUPGs,
I have strange troubles with my key.
I DO can decrypt encrypted files that other people prepared for
me, using the public part of my key for encryption. Public key
attached to this message.
I canNOT decrypt files that were
Dear GnuPG
As a user of GPG4Win, is there any explanation in the compendium about
the meaning and use of subkeys (I cannot find anything about that matter
in the The Gpg4win Compendium 3.0.0)
Best regards,
--
Roland Siemons
0xAEEC5E2ED87628F5.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
bles
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> As long as you did not publish reports revocation, delete the key and
> re-import it without the revocation cert.
>
> Am 3. September 2018 17:03:19 MESZ schrieb "Roland S
Dear GnuPG,
I am already using GnuPG for a long time. But try to improve my
understanding of and working with it.
I became a member of Free Software Foundation Europe, and got a
smartcard. I wanted to use it.
And that is where the trouble started:
I intended to copy all my personal keys to the
Thanks Phil. Very interesting! I will look into that.
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:05 PM, Phil Pennock <gnupg-us...@spodhuis.org>
wrote:
> On 2018-05-22 at 19:35 -0700, Craig P Hicks wrote:
> > "A Solution for Sending Messages Safely from EFAIL-safe Senders to
> &
At some finite date in the (hopefully) near future, most email client over
GnuPG users will have an EFAIL-reading safe system setup, if they don't
already. MDC will be strictly enforced.
However, the situation for a secret message sending is not so good. There
is no way to guarantee that the
IALNO" there.
The output of 'gpg-connect-agent "KEYINFO --list" /bye' is
S KEYINFO 4C4D4CBB69450D70DAECB0929B4E57E00D96A270 T
XXXX OPENPGP.2 - - - - -
S KEYINFO 259BD34A8AFCFDE34C08C637086496C890AF3640 D - - - P - - -
S KEYINFO 6BB6690E54C14D959135BBFEA6665F2E8A
6 3:54 PM
To: Rohit P on GnuPG-Users
Cc: Rohit P
Subject: Re: GnuPG vs. GPG4Win
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Saturday 8 October 2016 at 8:02:00 AM, in
<mid:maxpr01mb04127abd7bd6879c5ee2993197...@maxpr01mb0412.indprd01.prod.outlook.com>,
Rohit P wrote:-
> In
In Older versions of GnuPG, a system tray icon used to appear with an option to
encrypt text on current window.
Newer versions of GnuPG has no such option.
I am not understanding the difference between GnuPG and GPG4Win. Are these one
and the same thing?
Windows binary is not available for
I am using latest version of GPG. I noticed there is no option to generate RSA
4096-bit key. The same goes with DSA.
In older versions of GnuPG, this key size was supported.
.
Regards,
RP
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
___
From: MFPA <2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
Sent: Saturday, October 1, 2016 5:40 PM
To: Rohit P on GnuPG-Users
Cc: Rohit P
Subject: Re: Why GnuPG encrypted file has no icon?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Saturday 1 October 2016 at 7:47:39 AM, in
<mid:maxpr0
I am using Windows 7. Icons are there on all files. What I actually meant is
when a file is encrypted with GnuPG, the resultant .pgp file has no icon.
From: Paul R. Ramer <free10...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 1, 2016 11:17:54 AM
To: Rohit P
Subje
When you encrypt multiple files in a folder, GnuPG encrypted files have no
icon. It is difficult to immediately identify which are the encrypted files.
Any specific reason why encrypted files have no icon?
...
RP
___
Gnupg-users
Hi I am trying to install 2.0.28 on linux mint 17 but I get this message
even though I have located all of the libraries on my system Can I get
some assistance? thanks
***
*** You need libgpg-error to build this program.
** This library is for example available at
***
On 05/13/2014 04:03 PM, David Q. wrote:
For this reason, what I do today is share long keys with people I know *in
person*. We then use regular AES-256 to encrypt/decrypt our messages back
and forth. Every 6 months we meet in person to renew our keys.
You are right, but, in my opinion, for
On 04/22/2014 10:49 PM, Hauke Laging wrote:
We do agree that crypto is by its nature difficult...
I agree, but I believe the statement should be more
specific, i.e.,: ...Web-of-Trust is by its nature difficult...
If I can propose a we do agree statement, it would be
the following:
*We do
On 04/09/2014 04:39 PM, Kapil Aggarwal wrote:
...
All thoughts are very much welcome and appreciated.
This was put together some time ago for a group of individuals
with a specific use-case. This might not be generally
applicable: it requires a fair bit of understanding of
the fundamentals
0x01cd068e1a246c4c.
Any suggestion to fix the above issue?
Regards,
Karthik P
--
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain information that is confidential, privileged
Dear Forum,
I recently installed GnuPG (Gpg4Win). My purpose is to be able to create
encrypted files for exchange via email. No integration with an email
client such as Thunderbird.
Therefore I need to be able to execute Kleopatra or GPA. Unfortunately
Kleopatra does not work. I tried both
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 15:20, Hank Ivy hank...@hot.rr.com wrote:
What should I take? How should I organize, and protect the IDs?
Take two. A driver's license and a passport would be best, though one
probably authenticated you for the other. To protect them, put them
in your wallet or pocket.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/5/10 1:46 PM, Snaky Love wrote:
About GSWoT - does this cover my described use-case? I don´t quite get
it from a first glance on the website...
Actually, no, not at all.
- --
James P. Howard, II, MPA MBCS CAPM CGFM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
wonder if the key management issue would be simpler if there were a
master key, group members were an ADK, and GnuPGP supported ADK.
James
- --
James P. Howard, II, MPA MBCS CGFM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMWg8oAAoJEHPMAEw+5CSeBJQH/3tCo8vwsGR0mW5l4ul2YR8j
On 7/23/10 11:51 AM, war_is_pe...@privatdemail.net wrote:
Does that make sense? Are there known problems if a (primary) user ID
doesn't contain any email address?
Nope! Check out 0xE6602099 for my key with a primary uid of James
Patrick Howard, II.
James
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA MBCS
am using a Mac with 10.6.x and have done this with MacGPG 2.0.12 and
2.0.14.
James
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA MBCS CGFM
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org
On 7/16/10 12:50 PM, Alex Mauer wrote:
Do you definitely have to replug it, or is killing scdaemon sufficient?
Both are necessary.
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA MBCS CGFM
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org
It's not me.
No problem.
Le vendredi 11 juin 2010 à 09:38 +0200, Werner Koch a écrit :
Hi!
One of the subscribers to this list created a mail forward to an
automated ticketing system which responds to the the poster. The
owner of the ticketing system at secure.mpcustomer.com does not
signatures with hashes other than SHA1 or RIPEMD160.
James
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA MBCS CGFM
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg
up 3072 total.
I noted that, too, but I currently have three 2048 bit keys on my card.
James
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA MBCS CGFM
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http
take it I am missing something obvious in this?
James
- --
James P. Howard, II, MPA MBCS CGFM
j...@jameshoward.us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJL+87BAAoJEHPMAEw+5CSeGCQH/3cv2suaLFZTptKkALg2XZa6
FRCpJ4um4QsO+xwwdNBQ314XYSWBjmVkvrwHIAYHkzBDwdbbRpH+yrZz41S6T98/
EIRfY4K5zI5dDA+Q6fu
On 5/25/10 10:07 AM, Hauke Laging wrote:
What is the gpg version you use? IIRC You need 2.0.13 or 2.0.14 for 2048 bit
keys on a smartcard.
That did the trick! I was on 2.0.12 and moved to 2.0.14.
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA MBCS CGFM
j...@jameshoward.us
P. Howard, II, MPA MBCS
j...@jameshoward.us
pgp529PvAKpnX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
by the certifying
subkey and may have undually dwelt on it.
James
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA
j...@jameshoward.us
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman
, SHA224
Compression: Uncompressed, ZIP, ZLIB, BZIP2
howar...@thermopylae:~$
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA
j...@jameshoward.us
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org
this, too. But since I also do not claim any special wisdom
on the issue, I was hoping someone would. Since we all seem to agree
that communication and storage is difficult to distinguish, can someone
suggest why different keys may be desired in different circumstances?
James
--
James P. Howard, II
key types?
Thank you, James
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA
j...@jameshoward.us
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Wed Jul 22 2009 16:12:34 GMT-0400 (EDT) , Daniel Kahn Gillmor
d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
On 07/22/2009 03:59 PM, James P. Howard, II wrote:
I have created a 2048-bit RSA subkey that is authentication only.
I'd like to use this with SSH. A bit of Googling suggests this
cannot be used
is assumption on the
file to be verified and as a result, you can see the signature following
the name. More complex variants on this may be possible.
James
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA
j...@jameshoward.us
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
for each of 3 previous commands failed me... Also the same, if I used key
IDs. How to do it?
When you perform the import, you must use --allow-secret-key-import
but unless you intended not to use the master signing key, you should
not use --export-secret-subkeys.
James
--
James P. Howard, II
this, you have to have the key in primary key form in the (local)
web of trust. If you don't, then the signatures won't be used.
Well, I did succeed in doing it last night as a test. So I guess the
bigger question, is it poor etiquette?
James
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA
j...@jameshoward.us
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA
j...@jameshoward.us
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
, the private part of the encryption keypair is used to decrypt
documents; the public part is used to encrypt them.
Can anyone explain why there is a difference between signing and
encrypting keypairs, even for the same type (RSA)?
James
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA
j...@jameshoward.us
-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA
j...@jameshoward.us
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman
.
James
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA
j...@jameshoward.us
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
means instead.
It's best not to obsess over key size. Larger is not better, but it's
not as if it hurts you, either.
There are some ancient keys out there which are 512 bits (and I think
I've seen smaller). Are these likely still secure enough to use?
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA
j
the temptation.
Best,
John
--
John P. Clizbe Inet: John (a) Mozilla-Enigmail.org
You can't spell fiasco without SCO. hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net or
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Q:Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?
A:An odd melody
Aha! My provider fixed a doohickey somewhere (it was an error in a
mail forwarding configuration file) and it now works.
James
On 4/23/08, James P. Howard, II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is embarrassing. I've contacted my provider to find out why mail
is bouncing.
Thank you, James
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
--
James P. Howard, II
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jameshoward.us
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman
Yep, sorry about that. Try this instead:
http://jameshoward.us/robot-digital-signature-authority
James
--
James P. Howard, II
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jameshoward.us
-Original Message-
From: Sven Radde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:58:09
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED
This is embarrassing. I've contacted my provider to find out why mail
is bouncing.
Thank you, James
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Charly Avital [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James P. Howard wrote the following on 4/23/08 12:08 PM:
Yep, sorry about that. Try this instead:
http
and it won't get revoked by simply deleting it from the original
key.
Sorry if I misunderstood the point...
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
--
James P. Howard, II
[EMAIL PROTECTED
?
Thank you, James
1. http://gnupg.org/howtos/card-howto/en/smartcard-howto-single.html
--
James P. Howard, II
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jameshoward.us
pgpsI34I98Ria.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http
58 matches
Mail list logo
