On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 04:55:59PM +0100, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
- From tests carried out - Mandrava Linux was ok. I suspect that other Linux
distros have no
real problems - just because your works - does not mean that every other
Linux distro works.
However: because it works on my system,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 08:27:59PM +0100, michael crane wrote:
mwood@mhw ~ $ dir /usr/bin/gpg*
Sorry, that's lingering evidence of my VMS habits:
mwood@mhw ~ $ alias dir
alias dir='ls -l'
--
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mw...@iupui.edu
Asking whether markets are efficient is like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/05/12 14:03, Mark H. Wood wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 04:55:59PM +0100, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
- From tests carried out - Mandrava Linux was ok. I suspect that other Linux
distros have no
real problems - just because your works - does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 5/25/12 1:47 PM, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
For example opensuse - all versions tested:
(1) When you open the address book in TB select an address right
mouse click you get an option to create a per-recipient rule for
that person.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 08:07:54PM +0100, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
Openpgp/enigmail does not support gpg2 unless one has installed gpg
1.4.11 - but I no longer trust Openpgp/enigmail to do anything.
That's unfortunate. While I'm mostly a Mutt user these days, I have Debian
Icedove installed with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/05/12 21:47, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 5/25/12 1:47 PM, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
For example opensuse - all versions tested:
(1) When you open the address book in TB select an address right
mouse click you get an option to create a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/05/12 23:01, Aaron Toponce wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 08:07:54PM +0100, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
Openpgp/enigmail does not support gpg2 unless one has installed gpg
1.4.11 - but I no longer trust Openpgp/enigmail to do anything.
That's
On 05/25/2012 06:43 PM, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
I gave you an example which was Seahorse - clearly you failed to
read.
You did not specify which distro was refusing to give the source for
Seahorse. I've found it in the repositories for Ubuntu, Debian and Fedora.
I have set out quite clearly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23.05.2012 18:57, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 12:30:54 +0300 Mika Suomalainen
mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello Mika,
I cannot verify your signature, because you use PGP/MIME and
this mailing list uses mailing list
On Wed, 23 May 2012 18:17, da...@gbenet.com said:
I've had your key for ages - so why not attach it?
Sorry, I don't understand. You want my key? Look into the OpenPGP mail
header or simply use a keyserver.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:39:04PM +0100, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
I ran the debugging programme with Openpgp debugging options to
console and I got the message that with gpg2 installed one was not
able to digitally sign an e-mail whilst encrypting to their public
key which in all the named
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 5/24/12 3:09 AM, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
At least Enigmail fails to recognize PGP/MIME signatures on some
mailman mailing lists.
Every time this has been reported to us, it has turned out to be a bug
in Mailman and not Enigmail. If you can
On Thu, 24 May 2012 10:09:05 +0300
Mika Suomalainen mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello Mika,
At least Enigmail fails to recognize PGP/MIME signatures on some
mailman mailing lists.
That would explain the difference in what you and I see; No enigmail
here.
--
Regards _
/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/05/12 13:55, Mark H. Wood wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:39:04PM +0100, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
I ran the debugging programme with Openpgp debugging options to
console and I got the message that with gpg2 installed one was not
able to
Hi David,
your mails are hard to read because you do not trim the quotes and use
lines of 90 characters or longer. Please don't use more than about 72.
One hint anyway:
GNOME has a thing called gnome-keyring which hijacks the gpg-agent IPC
and thus you run into problems when using GnuPG-2. It
mwood@mhw ~ $ dir /usr/bin/gpg*
^^^
--
keyID: 0x4BFEBB31
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/05/12 19:48, Werner Koch wrote:
Hi David,
your mails are hard to read because you do not trim the quotes and use
lines of 90 characters or longer. Please don't use more than about 72.
One hint anyway:
GNOME has a thing called
Hey Robin,
I'll send you a testmail in a minute. I'm the guy from the GPGTools support
discussion we had today.
Talk to you off-list.
If any of the GnuPG wizards like to chime in on the technical side on the bug
tracker we're happy about any input.
Cheers,
steve
Am 22.05.2012 um 20:06
I don't know how much the demand is (or could be) but perhaps it would help
make more people use OpenPGP to have a round-robin email contact system.
Whoever is willing to help new users (like in this case) registers his email
address with the languages he's capable of communicating in. A
On Tue, 22 May 2012 21:28, steveb...@gulli.com said:
If any of the GnuPG wizards like to chime in on the technical side on the bug
tracker we're happy about any input.
AFAIK a Mac specific PINentry is used and not the GTK+ or QT version.
Thus I can't help.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 22.05.2012 21:06, Robin Kipp wrote:
Hello all, well, as of today, I finally decided to start signing my
EMail messages using GPG to prove the integrety of my messages. As
I am primarily using Mac OS, I downloaded MacGPG
On 23/05/12 11:19, Branko Majic wrote:
As a curiosity, any ideas on what you would do to avoid use of this system
for spam purposes? (although encrypted spam won't be of much use :)
A simple challenge-response system should suffice, I'd say. When a new user
mails to such an address, he receives
I think we had the PGP/MIME vs inline discussion already.
@Robert: Would that qualify for a second entry in your FAQ with the pro/cons
listed? I really would love to see some distilled output. The discussions on
this list are very valuable and having the pro / con arguments in some sort of
On 5/23/12 2:50 AM, Steve wrote:
I absolutely agree. At GPGTools we thought about an automatic testing
system. Checking if the mail was encrypted and / or signed and then
sending out the according reply.
You may want to move this discussion over to the Enigmail list. We have
a system set up
On Wed, 23 May 2012 11:30, mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com said:
I cannot verify your signature, because you use PGP/MIME and this
mailing list uses mailing list software which somehow messes up with
headers and makes PGP/MIME signatures unverifiable.
It is this old Mailman/Python illness. I
On Wed, 23 May 2012 15:24, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
You may want to move this discussion over to the Enigmail list. We have
a system set up that does much of this already, called Adele. We'd be
Is that a different one than the Adele from Gnu_PP_, which is a closed
source web service?
On 23.05.2012 12:56, Steve wrote:
I think we had the PGP/MIME vs inline discussion already.
I am using PGP/MIME in this email. Can you verify my signature on this
email? You can find link to my public key in my signature.
Now I stop answering to these PGP/MIME vs INLINE. I think that I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23.05.2012 16:24, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 5/23/12 2:50 AM, Steve wrote:
I absolutely agree. At GPGTools we thought about an automatic
testing system. Checking if the mail was encrypted and / or
signed and then sending out the according
On 5/23/12 11:29 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
Is that a different one than the Adele from Gnu_PP_, which is a closed
source web service?
I don't know. We have the source and permission to use it -- my
impression is that it's Free Software, but it's been years since I've
taken a look at our Adele
On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:35, mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com said:
On 23.05.2012 12:56, Steve wrote:
I think we had the PGP/MIME vs inline discussion already.
I am using PGP/MIME in this email. Can you verify my signature on this
email? You can find link to my public key in my signature.
Sure:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23.05.2012 18:54, Werner Koch wrote:
Weird. All PGP/MIME signed emails here cannot be verified if they are
from mailing lists.
PS. I am on this list so you don't need to CC me unless your email
client forces it.
- --
[Mika
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/05/12 16:38, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
On 23.05.2012 16:24, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 5/23/12 2:50 AM, Steve wrote:
I absolutely agree. At GPGTools we thought about an automatic
testing system. Checking if the mail was encrypted and / or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23.05.2012 18:54, Werner Koch wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:35, mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com said:
On 23.05.2012 12:56, Steve wrote:
I think we had the PGP/MIME vs inline discussion already.
I am using PGP/MIME in this email. Can you verify
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/05/12 16:54, Werner Koch wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:35, mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com said:
On 23.05.2012 12:56, Steve wrote:
I think we had the PGP/MIME vs inline discussion already.
I am using PGP/MIME in this email. Can you verify
On 5/23/12 11:38 AM, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
Why to move it to Enigmail list?
According to American legend, a journalist once asked the infamous bank
robber John Dillinger why he robbed banks for a living. Because that's
where the money is, he said.
Why should a discussion about Adele move
Hey David et all,
first: GPGTools Installer does indeed contain Enigmail and allows installation.
Not sure if it has the latest version since Mozilla's crazy versioning means
lots of maintenance and we couldn't find a way to automate including new
Enigmail versions. Also not sure if it is
On Wed, 23 May 2012 12:30:54 +0300
Mika Suomalainen mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello Mika,
I cannot verify your signature, because you use PGP/MIME and this
mailing list uses mailing list software which somehow messes up with
headers and makes PGP/MIME signatures unverifiable.
Mika Suomalainen 4fbd03cb.1070...@hotmail.com May 23, 2012 12:38:40 PM
wrote:
I am using PGP/MIME in this email. Can you verify my signature on this
email? You can find link to my public key in my signature.
Good signature from Mika Suomalainen mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com
Key ID: 0x82A46728
On 5/23/12 3:07 PM, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
Now I have 3 Linux Laptops. I started testing Linux distros with gpg2
- enigmail with Thunderbird - all 100 per cent Openpgp failed to
initialise with pgp2 and in fact Openpgp always signed to my private
key not my public key when using percipient
On 5/22/12 2:06 PM, Robin Kipp wrote:
Now, I'd really like to test out EMail encryption so that I can verify
this works properly, but for that, of course, I need one other party
also using GPG.
(Responded to on-list so that people can know your request has been
answered, otherwise you'll get
Hello all,
thanks a lot for that! Actually, I'm quite flattered by the amount of encrypted
messages that came in over the last few minutes from all of you who wanted to
help, I honestly wouldn't have expected so much feedback! I'll definitely reply
to all of you who took the time and effort to
Am Di 22.05.2012, 23:37:46 schrieb Robin Kipp:
Hello all,
thanks a lot for that! Actually, I'm quite flattered by the amount of
encrypted messages that came in over the last few minutes from all of you
who wanted to help
I am happy for him but obviously this approach doesn't scale well. :-)
42 matches
Mail list logo
