Re: WoT question - policy

On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 10:32:36 +0100, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz wrote: Hi Wiktor, > As for the sigs, sig1 are ignored in GnuPG by default, everything > else has the same value. So if Stefan's friends trust his key fully, > all keys he's signed will be equally valid. I like again to make it clear that

Re: WoT question - policy

On 2018-11-17 06:16 AM, Kiran Shetty wrote: On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 3:32 PM Robert J. Hansen wrote: I am Using "*https://github.com/smartrevolution/gnupg-for-java*; this repo. But now able to Run this. That codebase is old and no longer maintained. There are no well-maintained Java

Re: WoT question - policy

On 2018-11-17 07:21 AM, Kiran Shetty wrote: Running [0] https://github.com/guardianproject/gnupg-for-java project give Error : D:\AuxLedger\Java PGP\GuardianProject\gnupg-for-java-master\build.xml:63: Execute failed: java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "make" (in directory

Re: WoT question - policy

On Sat, 17 Nov 2018 17:51:02 +0530, Kiran Shetty wrote: > Running [0] https://github.com/guardianproject/gnupg-for-java > project give Error : > D:\AuxLedger\Java > PGP\GuardianProject\gnupg-for-java-master\build.xml:63: Execute > failed: java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "make" (in

Re: WoT question - policy

Running [0] https://github.com/guardianproject/gnupg-for-java project give Error : D:\AuxLedger\Java PGP\GuardianProject\gnupg-for-java-master\build.xml:63: Execute failed: java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "make" (in directory "D:\AuxLedger\Java

Re: WoT question - policy

Can you please help me with source code or git repo for the same. On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 3:32 PM Robert J. Hansen wrote: > > I am Using "*https://github.com/smartrevolution/gnupg-for-java*; this > > repo. But now able to Run this. > > That codebase is old and no longer maintained. There are

Re: WoT question - policy

I am Using "*https://github.com/smartrevolution/gnupg-for-java*; this repo. But now able to Run this. That codebase is old and no longer maintained. There are no well-maintained Java bindings for GPGME. You will almost certainly have an easier time using BouncyCastle, which is a Java

Re: WoT question - policy

Hi Team, Myself Kiran Shetty. I want to use GnuPG Java library for my Java Application. I am Using "*https://github.com/smartrevolution/gnupg-for-java *" this repo. But now able to Run this. Can anyone please help me with GnuPG running source code

Re: WoT question - policy

On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 18:47:05 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote: > > But i fail to see what any of this has to do with minors > > specifically (surely the good guidance applies after reaching the > > age of majority as well), or how law enforcement happened to sneak > > in at the end there. I suspect

Re: WoT question - policy

On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 11:31:35 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Fri 2018-11-16 17:00:33 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote: > > I understand your points, but like to point out my view of sig0 > > and why i think it is not good and why i wrote a policy that way. > > I think you're talking about this:

Re: WoT question - policy

On Fri 2018-11-16 17:00:33 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote: > I understand your points, but like to point out my view of sig0 > and why i think it is not good and why i wrote a policy that way. I think you're talking about this: > With the sig0 approach i have the following problem: I could create

Re: WoT question - policy

On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 08:03:09 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2018-11-15 23:41:32 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote: > > or if i sign with sig0 a key on a key signing party, where i also > > don't know that the person who attended is a good or bad person > > OpenPGP identity certifications

Re: WoT question - policy

On Thu 2018-11-15 23:41:32 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote: > or if i sign with sig0 a key on a key signing party, where i also don't > know that the person who attended is a good or bad person OpenPGP identity certifications ("keysignings") make no claims one way or the other about a person's moral

Re: WoT question - policy

On 16.11.2018 00:40, Dirk Gottschalk via Gnupg-users wrote: > There's documentation about the trustdb. I read it a while ago, but not > entirely. You can also set the amount of needed signatures for the > trust calculations and so on. Then comes the trust deepness into play. > I also have to read

Re: WoT question - policy

On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:40:11 +0100, Dirk Gottschalk wrote: Hi Dirk, > Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2018, 23:41 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas: > > You make a very important point, which i thought also about and > > that is my little approach for covering my a*#. I would strongly > > assume that law

Re: WoT question - policy

Hi. Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2018, 23:41 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas: > On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 22:54:01 +0100, Dirk Gottschalk wrote: > Hi Dirk, > > Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2018, 21:05 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas: > > > I disagree, with my humble approach imho third parties do not > > > know > > >

Re: WoT question - policy

On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 22:54:01 +0100, Dirk Gottschalk wrote: Hi Dirk, > Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2018, 21:05 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas: > > I disagree, with my humble approach imho third parties do not know > > that people are my real friends, colleagues, or that i belong to a > > certain

Re: WoT question - policy

On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 21:35:47 +, MFPA wrote: > On Thursday 15 November 2018 at 8:05:05 PM, in > , Stefan Claas wrote:- > > > > I am no expert, but i like to know from my example > > (because i don't > > understand this) how could i trust this internal > > computation, when it > > is only

Re: WoT question - policy

Hello Stefan. Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2018, 21:05 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas: > On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 20:15:21 +0100, Dirk Gottschalk via Gnupg-users > wrote: > > > > When i first learned about PGP in 94/95 i also thought why should > > > people sign each other's key for a WoT and why do we need

Re: WoT question - policy

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi On Thursday 15 November 2018 at 8:05:05 PM, in , Stefan Claas wrote:- > I am no expert, but i like to know from my example > (because i don't > understand this) how could i trust this internal > computation, when it > is only visible to me

Re: WoT question - policy

On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 20:15:21 +0100, Dirk Gottschalk via Gnupg-users wrote: Hi, > > When i first learned about PGP in 94/95 i also thought why should > > people sign each other's key for a WoT and why do we need a global > > WoT and what is it good for. > > This should be obvious. Please

Re: WoT question - policy

Hi. Am Dienstag, den 13.11.2018, 22:36 +0100 schrieb Stefan Claas: > On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 21:39:18 +0100, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz wrote: > > On 13.11.2018 17:54, Stefan Claas wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > i thought about creating a key certification policy, for my key, > > > and like to know your

Re: WoT question - policy

On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:05:06 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote: > On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:54:08 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > i thought about creating a key certification policy, for my key, > > and like to know your opinions. > > > > > > >

Re: WoT question - policy

On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:54:08 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote: > Hi all, > > i thought about creating a key certification policy, for my key, > and like to know your opinions. > > > > I have read in the past several policies, but i like to avoid > id-card

Re: WoT question - policy

On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 21:39:18 +0100, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz wrote: > On 13.11.2018 17:54, Stefan Claas wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > i thought about creating a key certification policy, for my key, > > and like to know your opinions. > > > > > > > > I

Re: WoT question - policy

On 13.11.2018 17:54, Stefan Claas wrote: > Hi all, > > i thought about creating a key certification policy, for my key, > and like to know your opinions. > > > > I have read in the past several policies, but i like to avoid > id-card / online

WoT question - policy

Hi all, i thought about creating a key certification policy, for my key, and like to know your opinions. I have read in the past several policies, but i like to avoid id-card / online video/chat etc. because i am not able to distinguish between a