Hi,
For some years mail-archive was archiving this list,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems to have stopped sometime around May 2002, and no longer appears in
the list of archived lists, though a search will find old msgs.
The filmscannner list is still active, and mails are still being sent to
Ummm, why can't you just require a list to sign up for the service before
you accept any messages from it? Then most spam sent directly to m-a's inbox
would be automatically ignored.
--
Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UKhttp://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/
The question of whether a
Hi,
As a first step I would add a manual step to the subscription process.
So when someone submits an archive, they would need to include *their*
email address and they'd need to do the standard thing, click on a url
that's included in the email.
This, of course, involves some coding effort both
Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
Presumably, all of the mail for any
particular list originates from the same mail server (or relatively
small collection of servers). And these are real mail servers, not
random machines with no maintainer. You can use this property to
advantage here, I think.
Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
Presumably, all of the mail for any
particular list originates from the same mail server (or relatively
small collection of servers). And these are real mail servers, not
random machines with no maintainer. You can use this property to
advantage here, I think.
Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
Presumably, all of the mail for any
particular list originates from the same mail server (or relatively
small collection of servers). And these are real mail servers, not
random machines with no maintainer. You can use this property to
advantage here, I think.
Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
Presumably, all of the mail for any
particular list originates from the same mail server (or relatively
small collection of servers). And these are real mail servers, not
random machines with no maintainer. You can use this property to
advantage here, I think.
Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
Presumably, all of the mail for any
particular list originates from the same mail server (or relatively
small collection of servers). And these are real mail servers, not
random machines with no maintainer. You can use this property to
advantage here, I think.
Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
Presumably, all of the mail for any
particular list originates from the same mail server (or relatively
small collection of servers). And these are real mail servers, not
random machines with no maintainer. You can use this property to
advantage here, I think.
Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
Presumably, all of the mail for any
particular list originates from the same mail server (or relatively
small collection of servers). And these are real mail servers, not
random machines with no maintainer. You can use this property to
advantage here, I think.
Dan Kegel wrote:
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
Running a serious spam filter on incoming mail is too computationally
expensive (there is a lot of mail!) but it is an otherwise good
suggestion. Unfortunately I know from my own inbox that a lot of spam
these days is specifically designed to get around
Thanks for all the ideas, I'll need some time to mull them over.
A quick comment on Pat's astute RBL suggestion - I already do use
a fairly gnarly setup for the Mail Transfer Agent, including use of
RBLs. It more or less matches Marc Merlin's setup for SourceForge
discussed here:
12 matches
Mail list logo
