Re: [heketi-devel] Should 'heketi-cli device add ...' wipe devices?

On 2018-05-15 at 12:14 +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 01:44:06PM -0500, Jose A. Rivera wrote: > > I would very much prefer not making it the default and requiring a > > --force flag. But I would want the feature in general, since I already > > effectively have such a flag in

[heketi-devel] Heketi v6.0.0 available for download

Hi all, Heketi v6.0.0 is now available [1]. This is the new stable version of Heketi. Older versions are discontinued. The main additions in this release are the block-volume API, a great deal of stabilization to prevent inconsistent database and out-of-sync situations, and tooling to do

[heketi-devel] John Mulligan now co-maintainer for heketi

Hi all, Better late than never... It's my pleasure to announce that John Mulligan (@phlogistonjohn) has been given merge-rights on Heketi, and is hence now one of the maintainers of the project. John has shown great contributions refactoring and improving the code, and been providing valuable

[heketi-devel] Heketi v5.0.1 security release available for download

dentifying the vulnerability and notifying us about the it. The fix was provided by Raghavendra Talur of Red Hat. Note that previous versions of Heketi are discontinued and users are strongly recommended to upgrade to Heketi 5.0.1. Michael Adam on behalf of the Heketi team [1] https://github.com/hek

[heketi-devel] R.Talur heketi maintainer.

Hi all, This is to let you know that Raghavendra Talur has recently become co-maintainer of heketi, i.e. he can merge patches. Thanks Talur for your good work on heketi and for taking this up! And remember: with great power comes great responsibility. :-) A corresponding maintainers file has

[heketi-devel] No more merge commits...

Hi all, From now on into the future, heketi.git will have a nice linear history: I just disabled the mind-boggling merge commits, and so the only way to merge into heketi.git is fast-forward rebase merging. :-) Thanks for @purpleidea of pointing me to this github merge model (I wasn't aware it

Re: [heketi-devel] Nos vemos!

; containerized storage product. > I am passing leadership of the Heketi project to Michael Adam, and I now > it is in good hands at Red Hat. > > Thank you all again for making Heketi awesome. Thanks Luis! All the best for your future endeavors! I'm sure our paths will cross again at

[heketi-devel] Heketi version 5 has been released!

Hi all, Heketi version 5 has just been released. Here is the high-level changelog since version 4: - Set Gluster Volume options based on user input. - Allow disperse volumes to be 2+1. - Use glide instead of godeps for build dependencies. - Increase test coverage. - Compress database when

Re: [heketi-devel] Trouble with SSH executor

p > > 192.168.121.249:22: getsockopt: connection timed out > > > > What's your setup? I'm just using the gluster-kubernetes vagrant > > environment. > > > > --Jose > > > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Michael Adam <ob...@samba.org> wrote: >

Re: [heketi-devel] Trouble with SSH executor

On 2017-08-30 at 16:34 +0200, Michael Adam wrote: > On 2017-08-30 at 09:05 -0500, Jose A. Rivera wrote: > > Slightly different error. Yours is: > > > > /src/github.com/heketi/heketi/executors/sshexec/peer.go:76: dial tcp > > 192.168.10.100:22: getsockopt: no

Re: [heketi-devel] Trouble with SSH executor

date my system to latest versions and retry. Cheers - Michael > --Jose > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Michael Adam <ob...@samba.org> wrote: > > Seems like you're hitting the same thing that I asked about > > two weeks ago: > > > > http://lists.gluster.org

Re: [heketi-devel] Trouble with SSH executor

Seems like you're hitting the same thing that I asked about two weeks ago: http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/heketi-devel/2017-August/000165.html (with unmodified code) You seem to have a few more clues than I do. I'll have to re-test again. Just linking the two cases for now... Cheers -

Re: [heketi-devel] Call for review of #769 and propose to release 5.0

On 2017-05-23 at 21:10 -0400, Luis Pabon wrote: > Hi community, > I would like to call for review https://github.com/heketi/heketi/pull/769 Thanks Luis, I am certainly going to look at that soon. (Also going to compar with what I have in my local WIP branches..) > which removes the need for

Re: [heketi-devel] To pass a *bolt.DB or a *bolt.Tx

Hi Talur, Thanks for this write-up! It sounds all very consistent. But I will want to thoroughly look at the code. The Mutex thing sounds a bit like complete serialization (for write processes). Cheers - Michael On 2017-03-10 at 02:03 +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > Here is what Bolt

Re: [heketi-devel] Heketi release meeting

On 2016-12-15 at 14:45 -0500, Mohamed Ashiq Liyazudeen wrote: > Ok for me. > - Original Message - > From: "Luis Pabon" > To: "Mohamed Ashiq Liyazudeen" > Cc: "Jose A. Rivera" , heketi-devel@gluster.org > Sent: Thursday,

Re: [heketi-devel] Updated vagrant setup for heketi on kube on centos

Very cool, thanks! I am going to have a deeper look, but at first sight, this looks great! Michael - Original Message - > Hey folks! > > I've managed to build on Luis' kubernetes-centos repo and put together > a set of scripts that will allow you to deploy heketi on that repo's >