[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Zheng Shao reassigned HIVE-288:
---
Assignee: Zheng Shao
Remove the old serde package
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Zheng Shao reassigned HIVE-290:
---
Assignee: Zheng Shao
Add back generator for complex.seq
--
I'm worried that trying to create a new release every other week will be
too often. Isn't there a risk that we're still fixing bugs in 0.3 when
the 0.5 branch is cut if we run into something unexpected?
It seems Hadoop is suffering from this issue a bit lately even though
they branch quarterly,
testCliDriver_union3 broken
---
Key: HIVE-334
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-334
Project: Hadoop Hive
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Query Processor
Reporter: Johan Oskarsson
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shyam Sundar Sarkar updated HIVE-192:
-
Attachment: (was: Hive_diff)
Cannot create table with timestamp type column
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shyam Sundar Sarkar updated HIVE-192:
-
Attachment: TIMESTAMP_specification.txt
This is the design document for Hive TIMESTAMP
See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hive-trunk-h0.17/27/changes
Changes:
[zshao] HIVE-223. Test cases for single map-reduce group-by using map-side
aggregation. (Namit Jain via zshao)
--
[...truncated 18981 lines...]
[junit] diff
All,
Please inspect and leave some comments on TIMESTAMP design doc (mainly
created from MySQL 6.0 spec). TIMESTAMP implementation can have impact on
other parts of Hive code. So please let me know which specific syntax can be
initially implemented.
Thanks,
shyam_sar...@yahoo.com
See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hive-trunk-h0.18/28/changes
Changes:
[zshao] HIVE-223. Test cases for single map-reduce group-by using map-side
aggregation. (Namit Jain via zshao)
--
[...truncated 21851 lines...]
[junit] diff
I am also a little worried about a lot of releases and managing them. perhaps
what's clouding my judgement is that there are a lot of critical bugs yet to be
fixed - so I don't see how we can stabilize the first release in a couple of
weeks - or even a month (which is what killed 0.2 I think to
+1, sounds like a solid plan.
Joydeep Sen Sarma wrote:
I am also a little worried about a lot of releases and managing them. perhaps
what's clouding my judgement is that there are a lot of critical bugs yet to
be fixed - so I don't see how we can stabilize the first release in a couple
of
+1. I agree that two weeks per release is quite nice from an agile kinda
perspective (sprints), but the project could use a few longer release cycles
with concerted efforts towards stability, qa, and documentation. Once that's
on a roll, tightening the release cycle seems like a good idea.
On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12680559#action_12680559
]
Namit Jain commented on HIVE-316:
-
Can you add a test - I am not sure whether it will work
I think a big reason for what killed 0.2 was the fact that we decided to deploy
trunk into production because of some features that the internal users were
asking for, instead of just continuing with the 0.2 branch. What I want to
stress is that we cannot do that going forward. Once we branch
External Tables should have the option to be marked Read Only
-
Key: HIVE-335
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-335
Project: Hadoop Hive
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12680567#action_12680567
]
Prasad Chakka commented on HIVE-316:
Warehouse.java: 86, 94
you should guard against null
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12680570#action_12680570
]
Prasad Chakka commented on HIVE-318:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12680575#action_12680575
]
Namit Jain commented on HIVE-192:
-
For the first cut, we dont need so much flexibility. Let
I am in general agreement - but the problems is the mail below doesn't explain
why trunk was deployed.
Performance fixes are like critical bugs. We cannot run a production cluster
that's hurting for performance on non-performant software. To that extent - it
was a mistake for us to consider
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12680584#action_12680584
]
Namit Jain commented on HIVE-318:
-
Hi Jeff, all the issues are pretty similar, and their
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12680595#action_12680595
]
Shyam Sundar Sarkar commented on HIVE-192:
--
Ok. After lot of inspection over the
Till now the discussion is mainly on policy.
However, another important thing is what we plan to work on in the next 2-3
weeks. Let's say we are focusing on fixing bugs (both Facebook users and
open-source community users are crying for bug fixes, from what I can see).
After 2-3 weeks when most
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Thusoo reassigned HIVE-316:
--
Assignee: Richard Lee
Made Richard a contributor and assigned the bug to him.
External table
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Namit Jain updated HIVE-318:
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
[Hive] union all queries broken - all kinds of problems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Namit Jain updated HIVE-318:
Attachment: hive.318.2.patch
incorporate prasad's comments
[Hive] union all queries broken - all kinds of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Namit Jain updated HIVE-318:
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
[Hive] union all queries broken - all kinds of problems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12680651#action_12680651
]
Prasad Chakka commented on HIVE-318:
- make the union transform before the column pruner.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Thusoo updated HIVE-218:
---
Priority: Critical (was: Blocker)
Affects Version/s: 0.3.0
Marking this as a critical as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-35?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Chakka resolved HIVE-35.
---
Resolution: Fixed
smallint is supported right now
removed references to \xxx in the tutorial
Fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-39?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Chakka resolved HIVE-39.
---
Resolution: Fixed
i think this is fixed quite some time ago
Hive: we should be able to specify a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-41?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Chakka resolved HIVE-41.
---
Resolution: Fixed
all the above are exposed using syntax 'alter table set '
Expose various hive
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raghotham Murthy updated HIVE-302:
--
Issue Type: Bug (was: Improvement)
Implement LINES TERMINATED BY
TBinaryProtocol blow up the data size between map-reduce boundary
-
Key: HIVE-336
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-336
Project: Hadoop Hive
Issue Type: Bug
LazySimpleSerDe should support array and map types
--
Key: HIVE-337
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-337
Project: Hadoop Hive
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
ERROR: UNIT TEST using PATCH hive.318.2.patch FAILED!!
[junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.hive.cli.TestCliDriver FAILED (timeout)
[junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.parse.TestParse FAILED
BUILD FAILED
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12680701#action_12680701
]
Ashish Thusoo commented on HIVE-226:
This works with \N in the load file for nulls. We
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Thusoo updated HIVE-238:
---
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
Affects Version/s: 0.3.0
Marking as a blocker for 0.3 as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Thusoo updated HIVE-251:
---
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
Marking this as a blocker for 0.3 as there is no suitable workaround.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Zheng Shao resolved HIVE-205.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
file sink operator needs unique file names
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12680708#action_12680708
]
Venky Iyer commented on HIVE-251:
-
I believe this has to do with cases where the (streaming)
Executing cli commands into thrift server
-
Key: HIVE-338
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-338
Project: Hadoop Hive
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Server Infrastructure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12680726#action_12680726
]
Min Zhou commented on HIVE-322:
---
Files reside in tmpfiles, Jars in tmpjars of hadoop system.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12680729#action_12680729
]
Raghotham Murthy commented on HIVE-290:
---
+1
looks good.
Add back generator for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raghotham Murthy updated HIVE-287:
--
Description:
The following query does not work:
select count(distinct col1, col2) from Tbl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raghotham Murthy updated HIVE-282:
--
Component/s: Query Processor
IN statement for WHERE clauses
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raghotham Murthy updated HIVE-280:
--
Component/s: Query Processor
reserve keywords such as type, database, view etc for future use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12680731#action_12680731
]
Raghotham Murthy commented on HIVE-287:
---
results in a compiler error:
FAILED: Error in
[Hive] problem in count distinct in 1mapreduce job with map side aggregation
Key: HIVE-339
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-339
Project: Hadoop Hive
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Namit Jain updated HIVE-339:
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
[Hive] problem in count distinct in 1mapreduce job with map side
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Namit Jain updated HIVE-339:
Attachment: hive.339.1.patch
[Hive] problem in count distinct in 1mapreduce job with map side aggregation
50 matches
Mail list logo