Le 26/03/2015 02:35, Henning Rogge a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Alexandru Petrescu
alexandru.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Err, no. It's an A-B-C situation where each (even B) has 1
interface, and all are in an IBSS. This is the situation
described in that draft.
Are there
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Alexandru Petrescu
alexandru.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Err, no. It's an A-B-C situation where each (even B) has 1 interface,
and all are in an IBSS. This is the situation described in that draft.
Are there 1-interface routers in homenet?
In an 802.11 IBSS,
On Mar 24, 2015, at 5:19 PM, David Lamparter equi...@diac24.net wrote:
As a consequence, when we talk about 802.11, we would be talking about
AP / BSS, not ad-hoc / IBSS. No hidden node problem. No intransitive
reachability. Massively reduced marginal links (because when you start
losing
Le 24/03/2015 17:49, David Lamparter a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 05:28:05PM -0500, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
Le 24/03/2015 17:19, David Lamparter a écrit :
Before we lose this, let it be noted that we seemed to have
arrived at no for an answer to whether we want to deal with
Le 24/03/2015 19:01, Juliusz Chroboczek a écrit :
Before we lose this, let it be noted that we seemed to have arrived
at no for an answer to whether we want to deal with
non-transitive networks, *as part of this particular routing
protocol discussion*.
This is what the protocol comparison
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 05:28:05PM -0500, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
Le 24/03/2015 17:19, David Lamparter a écrit :
Before we lose this, let it be noted that we seemed to have arrived
at no for an answer to whether we want to deal with non-transitive
networks, *as part of this particular
Hi Homenet chairs list,
Before we lose this, let it be noted that we seemed to have arrived at
no for an answer to whether we want to deal with non-transitive
networks, *as part of this particular routing protocol discussion*.
If I'm misrepresenting the outcome from today's meeting, someone
Le 24/03/2015 17:19, David Lamparter a écrit :
Hi Homenet chairs list,
Before we lose this, let it be noted that we seemed to have arrived
at no for an answer to whether we want to deal with non-transitive
networks, *as part of this particular routing protocol discussion*.
If I'm
Before we lose this, let it be noted that we seemed to have arrived at
no for an answer to whether we want to deal with non-transitive
networks, *as part of this particular routing protocol discussion*.
This is what the protocol comparison draft has to say on the subject:
We believe that
