[x] migrate to java.util.logging
With solutions like JULI [1] and jul-Log4j-bridge [2] I see no reason of
what so ever for both commons logging and slf4j to exist
Oleg
[1] http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/logging.html
[2]
[X] keep Commons logging
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:15 AM, Sean Timm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---
[X] keep Commons logging
[X] migrate to SLF4J
[ ] migrate to java.util.logging
---
I'm using approval voting. ;-) (Basically, option 1 or 2 is fine. Just
2008/6/2 Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Folks,
We are currently considering whether we should continue using
commons-logging or migrate to SLF4J or java.util.logging. Please let us
what your preference is. We are going to make the final decision based
on the results of the poll. A
toolkit for HttpClient 4.x
Folks,
We are currently considering whether we should continue using
commons-logging or migrate to SLF4J or java.util.logging. Please let us
what your preference is. We are going to make the final decision based
on the results of the poll. A simple majority will _not_
On 02/06/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
We are currently considering whether we should continue using
commons-logging or migrate to SLF4J or java.util.logging. Please let us
what your preference is. We are going to make the final decision based
on the results of
- commons logging
...Pete
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
---
[ ] keep Commons logging
[X] migrate to SLF4J
[ ] migrate to java.util.logging
---
Thanks for the wonderful work you guys are doing.
Greg.
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee
and may contain information
