On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 12:13 -0700, David Gallardo wrote:
I've read section 9.1 and don't see how this would be in violation of the
spec. I intend to use the body merely to specify the query, the server
doesn't preserve it, so it's an entirely safe, idempotent retrieval
operation--like any
commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Message-body-in-GET-method--tp17994858p18018800.html
Sent from the HttpClient-User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Message-body-in-GET-method--tp17994858p18018948.html
Sent from the HttpClient-User
/Message-body-in-GET-method--tp17994858p18019217.html
Sent from the HttpClient-User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HttpRequestBase. I believe
it should be in keeping with the rfc rather than convention, but would
welcome further discussion.
@D
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Message-body-in-GET-method--tp17994858p17994858.html
Sent from the HttpClient-User mailing list archive
