On 20/04/2024 12:41 am, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
It is an attempt to apply dynamic typing to reduce the need to write
the explicit type. This service gets carried out by the compiler. In
true dynamically typed languages you can reuse variables like "start"
or "tmp" to refer to values of
On 20/04/2024 1:42 am, Jay Maynard wrote:
Agreed Java is simply far too complex a language and ecosystem to hold in
the mind. Python is as ubiquitous and much easier to deal with.
Really? What do you NEED to learn for Java that you don't need to learn
for other languages? public static void
The assertion of the subject is surely not correct. I do not choose to guess in
just what way.
Perhaps more important, the ALESERV is likely creating a system integrity
violation in specifying access=public.
Please take to heart the comment on ASSBSTKN:
As with other ASCB/ASSB fields,
I think the comment in SDWAEC1 is quite clear:
Extended control PSW at time of error(abend). When the error was a program
interrupt within
transactional execution, this is the PSW at the time of the program interrupt
within the transaction.
It means what it says.
When you mention an RB, it is
First, I'm not a performance expert.
Here are my thoughts.
Based on what information you have provided it would seem you are talking
one CEC. The environment I last worked at we had two CECs and we did Db2
data sharing with Db2 systems spread across both CECs. From time to time,
we would look
Seems to say here that you need JAVA V17 on z/OS V3.1:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/3.1.0?topic=installation-software-requirements-running-zos-31
If you already have that installed, just change your JAVA_HOME and give it a
shot.
Dave Jousma
Vice President | Director, Technology Engineering
Thank you.
Your VIPA conversion is correct. I just tested on my Test LPAR.
According to IBM IUTSAMEH can stay were it in the TCPIP parms definition
and it will not be required by V3.1 TCP/ip to be converted. And yes, it
apparently do get defined by VTAM automagically by specifying IPCONFIG
Hello list,
Just IPLed z/OS 3.1 on our sandbox and tried to start zOSMF. The angel process
started but the server process fails. I compared file permissions in the
/global/zosmf directories between my 2.4 system and 3.1 system and they're the
same. The server is failing in the IZUSVR1 step
Create a backup copy of your profile without the filter, then overlay
your current profile with the backup before entering SDSF?
Michael
At 12:40 PM 4/18/2024, Collinson, Shannon wrote:
I keep hosing myself up by setting an operlog filter to find very
specific needles-in-the-haystack and
Oh, I dunno. Generalizations aren't invalid as long as you don't mistake them
for blanket stereotypes, and generalizations are the only possible way to
describe general groups. I see no cause for offense here.
---
Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
/* Be kind whenever
Why don't you speak for yourself instead of inventing urban legends?
Both old timers and youngsters are individuals, with vast panoplies of
different attitudes and opinions. It is presumptuous and rude to make such
arrogant blanket characterizations.
There are plenty of old timers who like the
More: One of the folks who was having problems writes:
>I gave up on using my pacbell.net email...I switched my Assembler list
>and IBM MAIN list to my .gmail email address and all is well.
I looked, and pacbell.net has no SPF record. Remember, mine started flowing
once I had enabled SPF,
In my specific case, it is all English (IBMish).
*| **Itschak Mugzach | Director | SecuriTeam Software **|** IronSphere
Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous Monitoring for Z/OS, zLinux
and IBM I **| *
*|* *Email**: i_mugz...@securiteam.co.il **|* *Mob**: +972 522 986404 **|*
*Skype**:
Agreed Java is simply far too complex a language and ecosystem to hold in
the mind. Python is as ubiquitous and much easier to deal with.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 10:25 AM David Crayford <
0595a051454b-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> I’m not sure I would use Java as a REXX alternative
It depends on the language and the context. I'm not conversant with Arabic, but
Hebrew uses both, as does English.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
From: IBM Mainframe
I’m not sure I would use Java as a REXX alternative now we have Python. REXX is
very much legacy now. The old timers love it because it’s all they know but
push come to shove Python is much easier to learn then Java with all the OO
cruft.
> On 19 Apr 2024, at 7:50 AM, Andrew Rowley
> wrote:
> I have an interesting case what I cannot untangle. I was creating multiple
> ORDERSERVER using the same job where downloadmethod="https" is specified,
> only the SMPCSI changed. For products like zSecure, MFA, AO, Netview, etc,
> the job ran fine and downloaded relevant PTFs, however in case
+1 for the oleinfo utilities Rony points to here. They were a great help to me
in crafting and debugging a VBS script I was writing to help automate creation
of an Excel report spreadsheet.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Rony G. Flatscher
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 9:45
On 19.04.2024 01:50, Andrew Rowley wrote:
On 18/04/2024 8:29 pm, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
The mileage of people here vary including the Java people themselves who have started to reduce
the need of explicit declarations like the new "var" (imitating JavaScript) instead of strict
types or
On 18.04.2024 15:14, Bob Bridges wrote:
I don't often admit it, because I expect to get flamed for it, but in fact when
I write in VBA almost all my variables are type VAR - that is, I hardly ever
use the Dim statement to assign a type. To introduce an array, sure, or to
maintain correct
As far as I know there is nothing available outside of the Abend-AID product.
Long ago, Abend-AID wrote its report to the SYSUDUMP/SYSABEND DD,
but that was changed decades ago. Now, Abend-AID writes its reports to
a VSAM sat set in a proprietary format.
Assuming that the report was sent to
W dniu 19.04.2024 o 10:32, Massimo Biancucci pisze:
Hi everybody,
In a presentation at GSE I saw a slide with a graph about the advantage of
having more small sysplex LPARs versus a bigger one.
So for instance, it's better to have 5 LPARs with 4 processors than one
with 20.
There was a
Hello
I have an interesting case what I cannot untangle. I was creating multiple
ORDERSERVER using the same job where downloadmethod="https" is specified, only
the SMPCSI changed. For products like zSecure, MFA, AO, Netview, etc, the job
ran fine and downloaded relevant PTFs, however in case
Ok thanks I’ll take a different approach
> On Apr 19, 2024, at 4:50 AM, Rob Scott
> <0618c90e6fdf-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> Joseph,
>
> Are you 100% sure that SDWAPRIM is not actually the same as the current PASN ?
>
> This might explain R15=0 and the ALET being zero
Zero experience.
However, as I was reading this I seem to remember that when IBM announced their
first 10-way mainframe that Amdahl released a statement that they would never
build a mainframe with more than 8 CPU's. Their reasoning was you had
diminishing returns once you went beyond 8
Agreed, it's been many years since I ran similar test with our software and
don't remember the exact details, but my recollection is that I saw no
noticeable change in CPU consumption. Which I remember being particularly
interested in because I'd heard of issues reading that compressed data.
Attention all those attending, or planning to attend, the next SHARE in
Kansas City #sharekc2024.
When you plan your travel don't forget that there are sessions on Thursday
afternoon with the last session ending at 4pm.
What this means is that if you leave early that you will miss out on the
Joseph,
Are you 100% sure that SDWAPRIM is not actually the same as the current PASN ?
This might explain R15=0 and the ALET being zero (although I must admit I have
never tried ALESERV ADD for the STOKEN of my own PASN before).
I still believe you need to revisit your design. Trying to be
Hi everybody,
In a presentation at GSE I saw a slide with a graph about the advantage of
having more small sysplex LPARs versus a bigger one.
So for instance, it's better to have 5 LPARs with 4 processors than one
with 20.
There was a sentence: "It doesn't take an extremely large number of CPUs
Joseph,
If I understand your last two posts correctly, you are attempting to add an
ASID (that you do not control) using ALESERV CHKEAX=NO to the DU-AL of a unit
of work that is abending (possibly for a large variety of reasons outside of
your control) in order to add a small amount of
30 matches
Mail list logo
