Re: [Ietf-dkim] Testing a DKIM implementation

2024-04-03 Thread Hector Santos

On 3/22/2024 8:25 AM, David Harris wrote:

My thanks to Murray S. Kucherawy, who was most helpful in answering my
previous questions about specifics of RFC6376..

I now have my implementation complete: I was wondering if there is a
recommended way of testing it - for instance, a reference site that allows you
to send messages and then replies with information about the correctness of
your implementation, or an application that can generate signatures for data
you supply, showing its work product (the various hashes and canonicalized
forms) so you can compare it with your own.

Any pointers would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance for any assistance.


There are number of verifiers.   One such address is 
dkim-autoresp...@isdg.net will verify your DKIM signatures and apply 
DKIM Policies such as ADSP (deprecated), DMARC and report the result.


--
Hector Santos,
https://santronics.com
https://winserver.com






___
Ietf-dkim mailing list
Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim


Re: [Ietf-dkim] Testing a DKIM implementation

2024-03-23 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Matthäus Wander wrote in
 <25cebd13-10a2-4b56-887a-f5bcaf0e0d46@wander.science>:
 |David Harris wrote on 2024-03-22 13:25:
 |> I now have my implementation complete: I was wondering if there is a
 |> recommended way of testing it - for instance, a reference site that \
 |> allows you
 |> to send messages and then replies with information about the correctness \
 |> of
 |> your implementation, or an application that can generate signatures \
 |> for data
 |> you supply, showing its work product (the various hashes and canonicaliz\
 |> ed
 |> forms) so you can compare it with your own.
 |
 |Maybe this one helps:
 |https://wander.science/projects/email/dkimtest/
 |
 |Ed25519 is supported.

Thanks for this!  Unfortunately i did not discover it earlier.
I mean, i had dkimpy (and dkimpy-milter) here, but it wants
a fully blown setup and installation, ie: access to DNS and all
that, the entire python3 infrastructure.
(When i extend my -sign for full operation somewhen in autumn
i hope i can somehow implement a test mode where the public (DNS)
keys can be fed in via some option.)

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter   he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)

___
Ietf-dkim mailing list
Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim


Re: [Ietf-dkim] Testing a DKIM implementation

2024-03-23 Thread Matthäus Wander

David Harris wrote on 2024-03-22 13:25:

I now have my implementation complete: I was wondering if there is a
recommended way of testing it - for instance, a reference site that allows you
to send messages and then replies with information about the correctness of
your implementation, or an application that can generate signatures for data
you supply, showing its work product (the various hashes and canonicalized
forms) so you can compare it with your own.


Maybe this one helps:
https://wander.science/projects/email/dkimtest/

Ed25519 is supported.

Regards,
Matt

___
Ietf-dkim mailing list
Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim


Re: [Ietf-dkim] Testing a DKIM implementation

2024-03-22 Thread Scott Kitterman



On March 22, 2024 11:31:16 PM UTC, Steffen Nurpmeso  wrote:
>David Harris wrote in
> <65fd789c.26406.50826...@david.harris.pmail.gen.nz>:
> |My thanks to Murray S. Kucherawy, who was most helpful in answering my 
> |previous questions about specifics of RFC6376..
> |
> |I now have my implementation complete: I was wondering if there is a 
> |recommended way of testing it - for instance, a reference site that \
> |allows you 
> |to send messages and then replies with information about the correctness \
> |of 
> |your implementation, or an application that can generate signatures \
> |for data 
> |you supply, showing its work product (the various hashes and canonicalized 
> |forms) so you can compare it with your own.
> |
> |Any pointers would be appreciated.
>
>I can quote a mail of mine from March 6th:
>
>  I am thankful i could contact https://www.appmaildev.com/de/dkim
>  for testing purposes.  (If you read this: your service is
>  broken, it does not support continuation lines in DKIM
>  signatures *at*all*.  But thank you!)
>
>It also does not support Ed25519.
>(Maybe they fixed it.  Apologies for when i am wrong.)
>
> |Thanks in advance for any assistance.

If someone wants to test Ed25519, contact me off list.

Scott K

___
Ietf-dkim mailing list
Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim


Re: [Ietf-dkim] Testing a DKIM implementation

2024-03-22 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
David Harris wrote in
 <65fd789c.26406.50826...@david.harris.pmail.gen.nz>:
 |My thanks to Murray S. Kucherawy, who was most helpful in answering my 
 |previous questions about specifics of RFC6376..
 |
 |I now have my implementation complete: I was wondering if there is a 
 |recommended way of testing it - for instance, a reference site that \
 |allows you 
 |to send messages and then replies with information about the correctness \
 |of 
 |your implementation, or an application that can generate signatures \
 |for data 
 |you supply, showing its work product (the various hashes and canonicalized 
 |forms) so you can compare it with your own.
 |
 |Any pointers would be appreciated.

I can quote a mail of mine from March 6th:

  I am thankful i could contact https://www.appmaildev.com/de/dkim
  for testing purposes.  (If you read this: your service is
  broken, it does not support continuation lines in DKIM
  signatures *at*all*.  But thank you!)

It also does not support Ed25519.
(Maybe they fixed it.  Apologies for when i am wrong.)

 |Thanks in advance for any assistance.
 |
 |-- David --

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter   he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)

___
Ietf-dkim mailing list
Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim


Re: [Ietf-dkim] Testing a DKIM implementation

2024-03-22 Thread Mike Hillyer
My answer here would be the same one I give users of a mailing service 
wondering about their DKIM signatures: send it to all the major mailbox 
providers and check the Authentication-Results headers. If they pass, your 
users will be able to successfully send to them, which is what really counts in 
the end.

That said, https://aboutmy.email is a good tester.

Mike

[cid:28236d7d-396e-4668-9860-ee2fa05eedf8]
Mike Hillyer
Co-Founder
443-472-7226

Let's Meet: https://cal.com/mike-kumomta/meet

From: Ietf-dkim  on behalf of David Harris 

Sent: Friday, March 22, 2024 8:25 AM
To: ietf-dkim@ietf.org 
Subject: [Ietf-dkim] Testing a DKIM implementation

My thanks to Murray S. Kucherawy, who was most helpful in answering my
previous questions about specifics of RFC6376..

I now have my implementation complete: I was wondering if there is a
recommended way of testing it - for instance, a reference site that allows you
to send messages and then replies with information about the correctness of
your implementation, or an application that can generate signatures for data
you supply, showing its work product (the various hashes and canonicalized
forms) so you can compare it with your own.

Any pointers would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance for any assistance.

-- David --

-- David Harris -+- Pegasus Mail --
Box 5451, Dunedin, New Zealand | e-mail: david.har...@pmail.gen.nz
  Phone: Number provided on request only.

Quote for the day:
"Life is like a sewer: what you get out of it depends on
what you put in."-- Tom Lehrer



___
Ietf-dkim mailing list
Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
___
Ietf-dkim mailing list
Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim


[Ietf-dkim] Testing a DKIM implementation

2024-03-22 Thread David Harris
My thanks to Murray S. Kucherawy, who was most helpful in answering my 
previous questions about specifics of RFC6376..

I now have my implementation complete: I was wondering if there is a 
recommended way of testing it - for instance, a reference site that allows you 
to send messages and then replies with information about the correctness of 
your implementation, or an application that can generate signatures for data 
you supply, showing its work product (the various hashes and canonicalized 
forms) so you can compare it with your own.

Any pointers would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance for any assistance.

-- David --

-- David Harris -+- Pegasus Mail --
Box 5451, Dunedin, New Zealand | e-mail: david.har...@pmail.gen.nz
  Phone: Number provided on request only.

Quote for the day:
"Life is like a sewer: what you get out of it depends on 
what you put in."-- Tom Lehrer



___
Ietf-dkim mailing list
Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim