Re: [fsug-tvm] Re: FSF Statement on Secure Boot

2012-07-31 Thread V. Sasi Kumar
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 12:35 -0700, Visakh wrote: @ Sasi sir: Oops! My bad! Actually, it was the other way around! You did post it to SMC, and I cross posted it from SMC to LUG. That was what I apologised for! :) I think I expressed the idea wrongly and caused the confusion. I will take more

Re: [fsug-tvm] Re: FSF Statement on Secure Boot

2012-07-30 Thread V. Sasi Kumar
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 21:07 -0700, Visakh wrote: My apologies to Sasi sir (Shri.V. Sasi Kumar, Free Software Foundation of India) for cross posting his mail to SMC here. I do believe that this issue will become prominent very soon - as the latest windows 8 may compulsorily require UEFI +

[fsug-tvm] Re: FSF Statement on Secure Boot

2012-07-30 Thread Visakh
On Monday, 30 July 2012 13:25:59 UTC+5:30, V. Sasi Kumar wrote: Dear Visakh, Thank you for posting it to smc. That is where I should have originally posted it, and, in fact, that is what I thought I had done. Some stupid oversight it was to post it to lug. Anyway, there is no need to

[fsug-tvm] Re: FSF Statement on Secure Boot

2012-07-29 Thread Visakh
My apologies to Sasi sir (Shri.V. Sasi Kumar, Free Software Foundation of India) for cross posting his mail to SMC here. I do believe that this issue will become prominent very soon - as the latest windows 8 may compulsorily require UEFI + Secure Boot in place of the age old BIOS. Newer systems