Test
I've been trying to increase the maximum outbound message size but it
doesn't seem to be working. I have it set to 12MB but we can't send out
anything larger than 7MB or so. The single message max size is set to
12MB also. I've stopped and restarted the smtp and queue manager
services, but
That's up to you but I wouldn't ever let anyone email a 7 MB file. I don't
think email was meant to send a file so large. As a matter of fact you may
have problems at the other end with some mail servers refusing a file as
large as that.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been trying to increase the maximum outbound message size but it
doesn't seem to be working. I have it set to 12MB but we can't send out
anything larger than 7MB or so. The single message max size is set to
12MB also. I've stopped and restarted the smtp and queue manager
services, but
Anyone know if you can sync Imails
calendaring function with a palm pilot?
If so, what type works?
Thanks,
Chris Patterson, CCNA
Network Engineer
Some firewalls have a max message size as well. Take a look at that. You can
change Imail all day long but if the fw does not permit it then it won't go
through.
Tyler
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matti Haack
Sent: Tuesday, July 06,
Only way I've found is using Outlook as the go between. Make
sure outlook is using icalendar for it's default.
- Original Message -
From:
Chris Patterson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 8:46
AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] FW: Question on
Palm
Chris:
For a one way Sync, you can use Wyncs
http://www.wyncs.com
You'll need to write some of the interface, but it's basic web stuff,
and should not be a big deal.
It will Sync from the calendar to either the Palm Datebook, or to Outlook
(one way right now).
FYI... Wyncs is one of my
I've been trying to increase the maximum outbound message size but it
doesn't seem to be working. I have it set to 12MB but we can't send out
anything larger than 7MB or so. The single message max size is set to 12MB
also.
MIME encoding increases on attachment of disk file size of 1 to msg
I just upgraded to Imail 8.12.
Everything looks good, one minor annoyance.
Is it possible to increase the length of the web mail / e-mail subject
lines?
Anything longer that +/- 30 characters is truncated and ends with ...
I.e. (ASI) Project Record #23730 New...
Thank you,
Jeff
much depends on mime encoding type. If base64 then 7Mb = 7+30% = 9..10Mb
it's better to continue tests with text attached data with quoted-printable
enconding rather than binary base64.
check your log files for remote server rejection
Regards,
Dmitri Elgin,
http://imailzip.com
- Original
Anyone have any experience running reports on iMail using an external
database and something such as Crystal Reports? We want to be able to
generate data based on last login, mail usage, etc.
_
MSN Life Events gives you the tips
When trying to access web messaging the following error is displayed in
the web browser window:
Template d:\imail\Web\style.cgi not present or empty template!!Error!!, Include file
does not exist.
How do I fix this?
TIA,
Dan
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
11.0.5510
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2149
Thread-Index: AcRjZ/f/pCQqDj/4TpyxLdtB16aoIA==
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Logs
--
20040706 104629 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) [63.147.233.20]
connect 63.147.233.2 port 1596
20040706 104629
Since web mail log-ins don't update the lastlog.in file, I have
considered writing an application that, at the end of each day, would
read the W1 file for successful logins and, if it is more recent than
the user's file info, update the time stamp.
We are a single domain, don't use IMAP. My
Rather than do that, why not just use the LastLogin utility?
http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/helperapps.html#Administration
Have a good one,
Christian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Carter
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 11:05
-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2149
Thread-Index: AcRjZ/f/pCQqDj/4TpyxLdtB16aoIA==
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Logs
--
20040706 104629 127.0.0.1 SMTPD
571 - MAIL REFUSED - Reverse DNS failed - IP address mismatch.
The implication of this error is that your outgoing IP, 63.147.233.20,
fails the common loopback test that checks to see if there is a
seamless IP-to-PTR-to-A-to-IP mapping. However, 63.147.233.20 indeed
loops back correctly
How does it know if someone who only uses web mail has ever logged in?
I don't see any updating of the lastlog.in time stamp when using Web
mail.
Thanks,
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian
Lawson
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004
--
20040706 104629 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) [63.147.233.20]
connect 63.147.233.2 port 1596
20040706 104629 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) [63.147.233.2] EHLO
jimc
20040706 104629 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) Authenticated
[EMAIL PROTECTED], session treated
the only purpose of lastlog.in is to keep last log in date time,
i do not see any problems with your app
note that web messaging do not update this file
Regards,
Dmitri Elgin,
http://imailzip.com
- Original Message -
From: John Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It doesn't just check lastlog.in. It also checks the user's 'LastLogin' value in the
registry (which Web Calendaring does update).
Have a good one,
Christian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Carter
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004
The main.srt file is updated when a webmail login occurs...this may help...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Carter
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 11:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] lastlog.in file
How does it
Thread-Index: AcRjZ/f/pCQqDj/4TpyxLdtB16aoIA==
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Logs
--
20040706 104629 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) [63.147.233.20]
connect 63.147.233.2 port 1596
20040706 104629 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) [63.147.233.2]
EHLO
jimc
Thanks. Wasn't aware of that one.
And thanks for other responses.
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian
Lawson
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 10:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] lastlog.in file
It doesn't
I am trying to get my anti-spam settings going, I used the list from
Ipswitch for content filtering and it seems to work, the log entries show me
that it is examining the messages, but it won't delete a message if it
determines that it is spam. I can't figure out where I am going wrong. I
would
Having problems sending to a particular domain from any users on our Imail
server... The applicable logs and returned mail headers are below: Any Idea
what the problem is?
571 - MAIL REFUSED - Reverse DNS failed - IP address mismatch.
Only they can tell you what this means (IP address mismatch
How does one go about changing the HELO? Does it automatically use the
official hostname or can change that in Imail admin or the registry
somewhere... I have done a quick search but dont seem to find this
anywhere...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Logs
--
20040706 104629 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) [63.147.233.20]
connect 63.147.233.2 port 1596
20040706 104629 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) [63.147.233.2]
EHLO
jimc
20040706 104629 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3
Has to be changed in the registry because it reads from the OHN.
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb and search for change official.
-HJ
- Original Message -
From: Jim Comerford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 12:04 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Mail
Dose Ipswitch have any idea when this feature may be released?
I have not seen any new info on it since April.
- Original Message -
From: Scott Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 5:47 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Outlook calender intergration
sbsnet.com.A 63.147.233.241
sbsnet.com.MX 10 imail.sbsnet.com
imail A 63.147.233.20
[sbsnet.com. IP] not equal [imail IP] may be thats the problem?
The message was very clear. Quit guessing.
The PTR hostname either
last I heard it is to be sometime late July 05
Greg
imail wrote:
Dose Ipswitch have any idea when this feature may be released?
I have not seen any new info on it since April.
- Original Message -
From: Scott Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 5:47
Has to be changed in the registry because it reads from the OHN.
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb and search for change official.
When hacking the above, To repeat my earlier advice:
1. An IP of a.b.c.d must have a unique PTR label.domain.tld (and should not
be a 2-label domain.tld).
RE: ...the log entries show me that it is examining the messages, but it
won't delete a message if it determines that it is spam.
At the bottom of the content filtering tab, where it is labeled action to
be taken on email... - what do you have in the options?
To Unsubscribe:
The message was very clear. Quit guessing.
No, it was not clear. It did not include the IP address of the mailserver,
so if any IP was used other than our best guess, we have to jump through
hoops to figure out the problem. The IP that they use to send to the IMail
mailserver has a perfect
I have it set to delete.
Here is a log entry:
20040706 130126 127.0.0.1 SMTP (0474003F) probability email is spam
0.00: email is good
It continues the delivery anyway.
If there is another log entry, or a setting, or an Ipswitch update, that I
am missing I'd love to know! I'm going
entry:
20040706 130126 127.0.0.1 SMTP (0474003F) probability email is spam
0.00: email is good
It continues the delivery anyway.
If there is another log entry, or a setting, or an Ipswitch update, that I
am missing I'd love to know! I'm going crazy going over and over these
config's and I'm
Here is a log entry:
20040706 130126 127.0.0.1 SMTP (0474003F) probability email is spam
0.00: email is good
It continues the delivery anyway.
It should.
That's a log file entry dealing with the Bayes formula, which says that it
is impossible that the E-mail is spam. Therefore
Jason, a couple of things...
1. upgrade from 8.05 to 8.12
2. Feel free to copy our Anti-Spam settings. While using one of the
third-party tools is better as far as the amount of time that you will
spend working on your settings to keep them current we are very happy with
our settings. Looking
I understand that, but this entry:
20040706 001813 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0374038A) [212.235.49.216] MAIL FROM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
20040706 001815 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0374038A) [212.235.49.216] RCPT TO:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
20040706 001838 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0374038A) [212.235.49.216]
e
Has anyone written a copy of odbcuser.dll that incorporates all
Imail users into one table (with a DomainName field to filter
users)? We don't like having them all in separate tables within the
db. It gets a bit unwieldy when you have several hundred domains
(and about to
Statisical Test:3
Content Test: 1
Ipswitch URL Test: 20
At 10:10 AM 7/6/2004, you wrote:
I have it set to delete.
Here is a log entry:
20040706 130126 127.0.0.1 SMTP (0474003F) probability email is spam
0.00: email is good
It continues the delivery anyway
As in July 2005?
Thats not good as I will have to find a new product for this company or keep
using exchange.
- Original Message -
From: Greg Foulks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Collaboration
last I heard it
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Anti-spam question
I understand that, but this entry:
20040706 001813 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0374038A) [212.235.49.216] MAIL FROM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
20040706 001815 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0374038A) [212.235.49.216] RCPT TO:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
20040706 001838 127.0.0.1
Wow! This looks sweet. Thanks!
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Riddle
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 1:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Anti-spam question
Jason, a couple of things...
1. upgrade from 8.05
Jason,
Note that we are no longer using the embedded tests in the HTML Content
Filtering (our flow chart still shows them being used - I will need to
update that).
Also, looking over my email again I noticed that we have shortened:
Prefix subject with: SPAM-HTML-Features to just [SPAM-H]
and
We've done this and it does make the DB much easier to manange.
Unfortunately, the source code cannot be released. The modification is very
straightforward.
- Original Message -
From: Alex Nikdel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 1:20 PM
Subject:
Imail can't create a new view when you add a domain (like it does with a
table), can it?? And, it wouldn't know how to add a new user. You can't add
a new row to a view while still maintaining the view's filters.
For example, you would have an ImailMasterUsers table with a DomainName
column
My log entries don't look anything like that. They look like this:
20040706 001813 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0374038A) [212.235.49.216] MAIL FROM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
20040706 001815 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0374038A) [212.235.49.216] RCPT TO:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
20040706 001838 127.0.0.1 SMTPD
Imail can't create a new view when you add a domain (like it does
with a table), can it??
That it cannot, but one hopes you do not have so many domain
adds/changes/deletes that that step cannot be separately scripted. In
fact, the whole domain-creation step can be scripted
this:
20040706 001813 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0374038A) [212.235.49.216] MAIL FROM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
20040706 001815 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0374038A) [212.235.49.216] RCPT TO:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
20040706 001838 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0374038A) [212.235.49.216]
e:\IMail\spool\D28050374038a2df5.SMD 7257
Thanks for all who answered. Changing the official hostname of the
primary domain to match solved the problem... So apparently they required
the HELO hostname to match exactly.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent:
Here are my filters. Email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] get through just fine
(which it shouldn't).
(First line is changed 'cause it wasn't getting sent to the list!)
B~(file name=.*\.vbs|file name=.*\.scr|file name=.*\.pif|file
name=.*\.bat|file name=.*\.shs):NUL
H~X-IMAIL-SPAM-DNSBL:NUL
[EMAIL
Thanks for all who answered. Changing the official hostname of the
primary domain to match solved the problem... So apparently they required
the HELO hostname to match exactly.
Remember, that may have solved the problem, but it also shows that they are
using a crazy anti-spam test. What that
logs to verbose (under Services, SMTP) so that you
can get meaningful information from them. Be sure to stop/restart SMTP and
the Queue Manager server when making changes.
At 11:28 AM 7/6/2004, you wrote:
My log entries don't look anything like that. They look like this:
20040706 001813 127.0.0.1
jason... a word of caution on the verbose logging they can make your log
files double in size... just keep that in mind if your log files are big ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jason O'Bara
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 3:29 PM
To:
Just to double verify, the smtpd32.acc file is server independent, meaning
you can update the file on one server, then copy to any other server running
the same version of Imail, correct?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Correct, just as long as you Stop/Start SMTP after updating
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 3:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] smtpd32.acc
Just to double verify, the
Thanks.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Barber
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 1:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] smtpd32.acc
You can use a LIKE filter on the e-mail address field in your view
definition, so there's no NOT NULL column that is not populated.
Viz.:
CREATE VIEW mail_example_com AS SELECT * FROM imail_master_users
WHERE mailaddr LIKE '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Or you could use the mail topdir:
I have a client (12 computers) in one location that is having problems
sending attachments.
They are on an Mpower DSL with a static IP. I host their email on my server.
If they send a message with no attachment, the message is sent to my server
fine.
If they attach a file, no matter what the
2004-07-06 15:13:52 Local7.Debug127.0.0.1 SMTPD
(24208b2c001ed01f) [208.57.66.83] MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2004-07-06 15:13:52 Local7.Debug127.0.0.1 SMTPD
(24208b2c001ed01f) [208.57.66.83] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is the only client I am having a problem
I have complained in the past about how inaccruate Ipswitch's URL Blacklist
is that they update every two weeks.
Just doing some housekeeping this afternoon removing domains that they
have on their current list that resulted in some false positives today.
How about the following:
snopes.com
I am suspecting it to be on their side. They are using a Mpower modem
connected to a Linksys DSL router, both of which are about 2 1/2 years old.
On my end, I have a new Sonicwall firewall which replaced an older
Sonicwall. This appears to have started just after I changed the firewall,
but at
At least by now they have learned (or at least I hope they have) that
they can't put much of the U.S. government on that same list.
But once again, obvious examples of inattention. All someone has to
do is read thru the list.
This sort of repeated tolerance for failure is why I had to abandon
Here is the Sonicwall log showing the 342k received from the client and
about 10K sent back. But that is it.
2004-07-06 18:37:08 Local0.Info 67.94.227.5 id=firewall
sn=0006B1114458 time=2004-07-06 18:36:26 fw=67.94.227.5 pri=6 c=1024 m=537
msg=Connection Closed n=7928
All,
As long as we are on the subject of IMail's automated blacklist, I would
like to make an announcement concerning this little project that I have
been working on for the past six months or so. For any of you who are
looking for a reliable and ACCURATE list of domains to block, you might want
Wow. That is VERY COOL of you and a great service. Do bad you actually
had to do it though.
At 07:19 PM 7/6/2004, you wrote:
All,
As long as we are on the subject of IMail's automated blacklist, I would
like to make an announcement concerning this little project that I have
been working on for
Dave,
Yeah, it has been a pretty daunting task, and definitely is not worth the
time that I put into it from a financial standpoint. It is just something
that I started doing awhile back that got way out of control, and I invite
IMail users to share in the benefits of my temporary insanity! It is
70 matches
Mail list logo
