enough
information there to get it to work under Safari as well.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 5:13 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Alternative sign on page with 2006.2
Thanks
Safari as well.
-Original Message-
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of *Matt
*Sent:* Friday, June 01, 2007 5:13 PM
*To:* Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
*Subject:* Re: [IMail Forum] Alternative sign on page with 2006.2
Thanks Mike, that saves us some time. I
.
The advantage is that the URL is not cached by the browser or proxies;
particularly if not using SSL.
- Original Message -
From: Marc Rosamond
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 9:41 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Alternative sign on page with 2006.2
*Subject:* RE: [IMail Forum] Alternative sign on page with 2006.2
The other file which was
provided by a user appears to work differently from what the article
mentions. If you use that file, your username ends up being
enteredUser
and enteredPassword which of course
, June 01, 2007 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Alternative sign on page with 2006.2
I am thinking about using your code in order to avoid that. Before we dig
into it, do you have any idea if you code works with Safari browsers?
Why the hell did Apple decide to create it's own browser
: [IMail Forum] Alternative sign on page with 2006.2
I am thinking about using your code in order to avoid that.
Before we dig into it, do you have any idea if you code works with
Safari browsers?
Why the hell did Apple decide to create it's own browser based on
code
is not cached by the browser or
proxies; particularly if not using SSL.
- Original Message -
From: Marc Rosamond mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 9:41 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Alternative sign on page with 2006.2
The other
The only difference between 2006 and 2006.1 was an additional hidden field
was added called hdnPwdChanged. No additional fields were added for 2006.2
so the login pages should continue to work. I took a look the files that
are included with the KB article and the one for 2006 will work if you
Marc,
I do believe that what you said here will in fact solve our problem,
though it would be good if you could confirm that it works with 2006.2
with your tweak. Please don't hesitate to post that here when it is
available.
Thanks,
Matt
Marc Rosamond wrote:
The only difference
Of Matt
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 11:04 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Alternative sign on page with 2006.2
Marc,
I do believe that what you said here will in fact solve our problem,
though it would be good if you could confirm that it works with 2006.2
.
-Original Message-
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of *Matt
*Sent:* Thursday, May 31, 2007 11:04 AM
*To:* Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
*Subject:* Re: [IMail Forum] Alternative sign on page with 2006.2
Marc,
I do believe that what you said
: [IMail Forum] Alternative sign on page with 2006.2
Marc,
I think you forgot to attach it :)
Thanks,
Matt
Marc Rosamond wrote:
I tested the file that I attached with 2006.2 and it worked correctly
for me every time.
If you run into any problems, post a message here and I'll
, May 31, 2007 11:22 AM
*To:* Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
*Subject:* Re: [IMail Forum] Alternative sign on page with 2006.2
Marc,
I think you forgot to attach it :)
Thanks,
Matt
Marc Rosamond wrote:
I tested the file that I attached with 2006.2 and it worked
13 matches
Mail list logo
