My problem is that this seems to be occuring every couple of days on a
random new account, dont really want this to keep reoccuring.
Same as you we create the accounts via another program not IMail..
ah! This looks like a suspect worth pursuing ferociously.
And you are therefore using an
If you have only one domain, and you do not use the 'machine.comain.name',
but use 'domain.name' for the Official hostname, then you want another line
in the HOSTS file with that machines IP and 'domain.name' along with the
line that has the IP and 'machine.domain.name'
Why would I need to
We store the User db in an Oracle database.
I scanned the records in the table and I could not see anything that looked
obviosuly different between the account it throws up on and the ones it
doesnt...
The only thing I can remember changing recently was the part of the stored
proc that
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 15:15:12 +0100
From: Len Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is another point where there is a real choice between Declude and
IMGateAV.
DECLUDE does have "per domain" settings and settings for "outbound mail".
That feature has already been enabled for the Spam checking! It
The folks at RBL and Harris Real are in court over this. The RBL
folks do not like the opt-in set-up that Harris Real use. They have a
multiple confirmation requirement that is in dispute. Harris Real have
not had complaints but were placed there due to the volume of Email they
send.
I have a mailing list subscriber with the address
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ... toothfairy.com is hosted by iname, and has
multiple inbound MX records.
3 which are dead:
Errors
--
o The primary mail server "mail-intake-1.iname.net."
If there hadn't been complaints, that is, if someone had not nominated them
due to complaints, they would not have been added to the RBL. Vixie
doesn't operate like ORBS and do things arbitrarily -- at least, I have
never seen them be arbitrary . . .
At 10:33 AM 12/30/00 -0500, you wrote:
I scanned the records in the table and I could not see anything that looked
obviosuly different between the account it throws up on and the ones it
doesnt...
I would create 10 new test accounts, then go web mail login to each
of the 10 and see if Imail blows up. If it does, then "could not
I believe the original block against Harris was before they had ANY opt-in
procedures. Before it got to court, Harris agreed in an out of court
settlement to use opt-in, but MAPS wanted them to use double opt-in and they
disagreed. I think this is why it is going back to court.
Personally, I
Any ideas on how to keep whoever this is from hitting us? This is only one
of many attacks from differant IP addresses.
Keith
12:30 13:32 SMTPD(06CE0102) [63.27.13.182] MAIL From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12:30 13:32 SMTP-(00DF) ldeliver spacey.net mailcopy-main (1)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3755
12:30
63.25.196.132 looks like a dialup account.
Any help would be nice.
Keith Lewis
SpaceNet, Inc.
12:30 11:37 SMTPD(01640036) [63.25.196.132] HELO janus.pks-software.de
12:30 11:37 SMTP-(00E0) processing D:\IMAIL\spool\Q0f6006a.SMD
12:30 11:37 SMTP-(00E0) ldeliver spacey.net rwin-main
Any ideas on how to keep whoever this is from hitting us? This is only one
of many attacks from differant IP addresses.
See the KB to hack the registry to limit the number of msgs per SMTP
session, make it small, like 3.
This is a dictionary attack, it looks like. Really not a lot you can
63.25.196.132 looks like a dialup account.
yep, from samspade.or:
SamSpade.org MAPSomatic
Resolve reverse DNS
Checking RBL, RSS, DUL (not resolving reverse DNS)
63.25.196.132 listed in DUL(127.0.0.3) (Scan 63.25.196.0/24)
DUL: See http://mail-abuse.org/dul/
-Original Message-
From: Steve Hagerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2000 5:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] spam list by domains in the kill.lst
Oh no that site is the stupidest site on the net. They try to attempt to call hosting
we have a network with two Windows 2000 Advanced server computers both are
domain controllers. We installed Imail on one of these computer and used
the NT user database, when this is done it will not allow users to login to
the web messaging, if the imail database is used it will allow users to
Guys I am not 100% sure but I didn't think you could have 2 domain controllers in a
domain.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of George
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2000 10:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] users cannot
Steve,
With Win2K servers can be either domain controllers, member servers or
workgroup servers. Because the way Active Directory distributes its
directory database among servers all controllers are domain controllers. It
is different from NT 4 where you have one PDC and several BDCs.
In fact it's best to have at least 2... One is the primary (PDC) and the
other(s) is(are) backups (BDC). They autoreplicate so that if the primary
goes down, authentication doesn't stop... if its a long term thing, you can
promote the BDC to a PDC and that way you don't loose any authentication
Hi!
In Argentina the government is de-regulating DSL, and we were asked to
participate on a debate of wich DSL commercial models are on the world,
what we think that is the best model for our country.
actually there are 2 phone companies that own the copper wires, they
started to put the
OK, I tried limiting the number of recipients, No luck. Take a close look at the log
below. I seperating it into three parts!
In this first part you can see that the message limit works.
20001231 000419 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (07C00068) [209.101.87.2] connect 202.185.129.3
port 62732
20001231
20 matches
Mail list logo
