On Tuesday, May 3, 2005 at 12:38:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
This is a known bug. The attachment blocking code sometimes doesn't update
it's log file date when the date changes causing it to write to a previous
days log file.
Attachment blocking code? I know that may be the
Does IMail 8.2 support SPF envelope mods on forwarding?
SPF is not a solution if you support users who forward email, as
forwarding breaks SPF.
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
What I said was:
SPF is not a solution if you support users who forward email, as
forwarding breaks SPF.
I didn't say SPF was a bad solution for everyone. And the real problem
is people who sign up for mailing lists using an email address that
exists only to forward to their real address. I
In the following log scrap, why is this fail and not pass? The ehlo name is in
the spf data.
20050502 235012 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (f4f4068c097f) [200.0.0.107] connect
64.63.240.3 port 55266
20050502 235012 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (f4f4068c097f) [64.63.240.3] EHLO
smtp3.ispsnet.net
a) It's a SoftFail, not a fail.
b) It looks valid to meg.
Maybe Imail is parsing the multiple hosts on a single a: incorrectly in the
SPF record? Joimail's SPF record appears correct.
(http://www.vamsoft.com/orf/spfvalidator.asp).
The Joimail.com DNS records need some work, however.
My system was being swamped with emails containing this virus. I am
running mxguard with clam and f-prot on the server. The latest clam
update seems to have trapped the virus but what troubles me is how this
is being done.
Here's a snip for my log:
05:03 08:53 SMTPD(C3CB0132) [200.0.0.231]
Jeff Hitchcock wrote:
snipI didn't say SPF was a bad solution for everyone. And the real problem
is people who sign up for mailing lists using an email address that exists
only to forward to their real address. I wish I could prevent those kinds of
accounts from being subscribed, but alas
Bruce -
It is a new day and I am planning on implementing your suggestion of
authentication. If I can ask your opinion, what would be the best way to do
this? Should I send out instructions to our user-base that says on such
and such a day at 7am CST we will be implementing... Here are the
200.0.0.231 is the lan address of the mail server.
200.0.0.54 is a client on the lan. There are two other client machines
that appear to be doing all the sending. Trend does not detect any virus
on those systems.
I have No Mail Relay selected and SMTP auth is required. What'g going on
Looks like all the antivirus software in place updated after the
infection had taken place. I run the Clam, F-prot and Trend updates at
6:30am every day. I guess I'll have to do it more than once a day now.
But even scanning the infected systems with Trend Officescan didn't turn
up anything.
Cameron Biggart wrote:
The good news is though that this sort of thing usually stops on its own
when the people sending the mail decide to either pick on someone else
(if it's a malicious attack) or change email addresses because yours is
being blocked by too many people now.
Sorry for the bad
Jonathan wrote:
You may not think SPF is a solution, but thousands of other mail admins
do. It's for this very reason that it'll help his problem. It doesn't
sound like he has a very complicated userbase, most of his users are
probably SMTP AUTHing their mail. I know the catches with forwards,
When adding a new user through the web interface, the first
name and other LDPA info isnt saved the first time I enter it. I have
to enter it again and then it saves it on the second time. Any ideas? Do I
need to re-init something?
Travis
I am getting lots of these returns and messages with attachments today. It
seems that one of our users got an email, because of a rule we have in place to
let everything from this domain, that infected his machine. It is the Sober.O
virus. Symantec.com has a fix for this virus on their website.
On some users, it wont take any
info, other than the last name. hmmI just tried the sync and that
didnt change anything. I stopped/started the LDAP service and
still no-joy.
T
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Rabe
Sent: Tuesday, May 03,
Eric wrote lat week when running INIT in
LDAP:
Do not go off this property sheet until this completes (can take a while). Let me knowif this worksOK, so how will I know when this is done?Travis
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Rabe
Sent:
-- Original Message --
From: Todd Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 08:48:37 -0500
Bruce -
It is a new day and I am planning on implementing your suggestion of
authentication. If I can ask your
On Tuesday, May 3, 2005 at 4:09:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Cameron Biggart wrote:
The good news is though that this sort of thing usually stops on its own
when the people sending the mail decide to either pick on someone else
(if it's a malicious attack) or change email
Hi all,
Has anyone who updated to 8.2 seen their log file size increased? Mine has
jumped from an average of 10MB a day to close to 50MB a day??? I've had
verbose logging for all this time but now I'm tempted to turn it off if I
don't find any solutions to this increased size.
The only thing
the hour glass goes away
Eric S
- Original Message -
From:
Travis Rabe
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 1:18 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] When adding
new user, not all information is saved the first time
Eric wrote lat
Gotcha.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Eric Shanbrom
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 12:46
PM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] When
adding new user, not all information is saved the first time
the hour glass goes
Hi
I am trying to set up the attachment blocking, but it does not seem to
be working.
I have enabled the blocking of *.exe, and then I send a email with a
.exe attached and Imail does not remove it.
I have tried with the replace option as well as the strip.
Am I missing something.
Gordon
Hi,
I have quite a weird
issue, concerning mail disappearing last night.
A few of the
management team use Outlook Express to view email at home (using the "leave a
copy on mail server" option). They have been doing this for over a year
now.
Emails that where
received at their home have
Weird
Something that I have seen on the list in
the past is that if you have an on access virus scanner that is set to delete
infected messages it can delete the MBX because it is one file. Maybe
that is what happened, because of the huge volume of viruses over the last day
or two
Did anyone else notice that the new url-domain-bl.txt file that was
supplied in the last update is almost 1.4 meg in size? Has anyone looked in
the file?
They are scanning AMTRACK, and LOTS of other legitimate domain names that
have no legitimate problems associated with them. There's also a
Thanks, I'll lookinto thatBut if anyone else has any theories,
I'd welcome the input :-)
Lee BartonSystems
Administrator--Impart--T
+ 61 (0)2 9231 3499F + 61
Hi,
I checked the new url-domain-bl.txt for swiss and german domains. I think, the
editor had
no clue about what he added to the list. Most of the domains are not spammers.
Even political parties are blocked, really democratic ;-)
I also checked some american companies, which are not spammers
How
can you check this.The creation date is the same as the date
modified?!
Lee BartonSystems
Administrator--Impart--T
+ 61 (0)2 9231 3499F + 61 (0)2 9223
28 matches
Mail list logo
