In adition to the Free AVG Home Version,
AVG is also a relativly cheap solution (even with central management)
if you buy it for business use.
The Network Edition is 1290$ for 100 Clients including 2! Years
Subscribtion
Single User is only 33$ for 2 Years.
And this program is very fast
Forgive me for
asking, but where do you download the latest version of
Imail?
I'm aware of 8.2
HF1, but don't you need to upgrade to 8.2 BEFORE applying the hot fix? I
can't seem to find the stand alone upgrade from 8.15 to 8.2 without the hot
fix.
You should have gotten an e-mail from Ipswitch
with a URL, Password and login. You will need to contact them directly.
Regards,
Travis
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chris Mechsner
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 7:20
AM
To:
Hello all...
I wanted to get your thoughts on a situation I am
having with IP Switch, along with a recommendation on AV products.
We currently run IMail 8.05 at a school, and it
runs perfectly for what we need. Our AV is expiring, and IP Switch is
telling us that they will no longer
At 11:05 AM 5/10/2005, you wrote:
Hello
all...
I wanted to get your thoughts on a situation I
am having with IP Switch, along with a recommendation on AV
products.
We currently run IMail 8.05 at a school, and it
runs perfectly for what we need. Our AV is expiring, and IP Switch
is telling us
We're using MXGuard, Clam and F-Prot which certainly works better than
Ipswitch's single AV.
Michael Graveen wrote:
At 11:05 AM 5/10/2005, you wrote:
Hello
all...
I wanted to get your thoughts on a
situation I
am having with IP Switch, along with a recommendation on AV
products.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony
NormanSent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 11:05 AMTo:
IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Expiring AV -
Mandatory upgrade to ICS
Hello all...
I wanted to get your thoughts on a situation I am
having with IP
I was in the exact situation. My AV expired in March, so I just
purchased mxGuard, F-prot, and ClamAv. I even went further and purchased
Message Sniffer. No regrets.
Scott
Tony Norman wrote:
Hello all...
I wanted to get your thoughts on a situation I am having with IP
Switch, along with a
We use mxGuard with ClamAV and FProt. Works Great. MXGuard
also adds some Anti-Spam features that you don't have in
IMail.
Craig
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony
NormanSent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 11:05 AMTo:
We use a combination of MxGuard and ClamAV on the actual server, and
Brightmail Anti-spam on the frontend, which runs Symantec AV which is
updated something like every hour. We got a decent pricing arrangement
because we renewed our client AV at the same time.
Before we went with Brightmail, we
Darin Cox wrote:
F-Prot by Frisk. Excellent product. Last time I checked a 10-user
corporate license was only $50.
I agree. We've been running it with Declude for over a year and it
works very well.
--
A. Clausen
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List
Hi,
Today I've been trying to use the Program Alias facility in iMail for now to
simply store the email as a text file (as outlined in the KB article:
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19980116-DD11.htm). This works fine but I
want to extend it further now.
So, I've written a little EXE which
When a program alias recieves the message it creates a temp file that can be
parsed, have your executable read the body and copy it to a text file. We
parse the body for commands and perform actions based on those commands
Rick Davidson
National Systems Manager
North American Title Group
-
We are using FProt and ClamAV with MXguard. It is a very effective package.
With the spike in Virus activity last week and this week, we stopped over
2500 viruses from getting to our users. ClamAV and FProt had the definitions
out a day before Symantec had the fix release. I wouldn't think of
agreed. Probably would have been a better move to include Clam into ICS
than Symantec.
Lee Cox wrote:
We are using FProt and ClamAV with MXguard. It is a very effective package.
With the spike in Virus activity last week and this week, we stopped over
2500 viruses from getting to our users.
Look at the file permissions on the IMAIL.EXE file and then match those
permissions to your new executable. That way you won't have to be logged in
with administrative privileges and the file should then run under a system
account.
Bruce Barnes
ChicagoNetTech
-Original Message-
From:
Hi Rick,
Thanks for your response, that was the idea, but I wanted to start by seeing
if I could get the exe to run as the parameter test I wrote didn't work.
It was a simple piece of code that took all the parameters and save them to
the file but again no file was created, here's the code:
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for your response. If you mean right clicking and under there, yes it
has the same permissions :(
Thanks again
Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Barnes
Sent: 10 May 2005 18:49
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
I've been happy with both products really (Brightmail/Symantec and
MxGuard/ClamAV), we use Brightmail for our own purposes, and we use the
ClamAV for our clients, unless they pay for Brightmail licenses for our
server.
Aaron Payne
IT Systems Administrator Postmaster
E-site Marketing, LLC
Why don't you start with a simple batch file to see if it works on your
system. If that works, then you can try calling the EXE from the batch
file, slowly migrating to just using the EXE.
I haven't called an EXE directly, but I have several batch and VBS scripts
in use to respond to emailed
So anyone currently running the Symantec solution for Imail
will be in this position when their current license runs out?Well isn't
that sweet. Guess we'll be making plans to get away from Imail then at that
rate. What the heck do I need all that other overhead (ICS) for?
Gr.
From:
REMOVE
- Original Message -
From: The Site Doctor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 1:00 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] Program Alias
Hi,
Today I've been trying to use the Program Alias facility in iMail for now
to
simply store the email as a
Hi Darin,
Thanks that's what I started doing, this is what I have atm:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -alias that forwards onto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -real inbox to insure that the email is received
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -program alias to bluebird.bat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -program alias to redbird.bat
bluebird.bat:
Why not just run imail with another AV?
Jason Loven wrote:
So anyone currently running the
Symantec solution for Imail will be in this position when their current
license runs out?Well isn't that sweet. Guess we'll be making plans to
get away from Imail then at that rate. What the
Hmmm...haven't used START before... have you tried it without?
Also, is your SMTP service running under LocalSystem or another ID? If it's
system, then I would think you just need to make sure the SYSTEM account has
RWXD permissions on the file/directory you're executing creating, though
it's
Does anyone who has begun to use the SPF Processing within IMAIL 8.2
have any suggestions for usage.
We are a large ISP so blocking based on lack of SPF would not be good.
Thanks,
Chris Patterson, CCNA
Network Engineer/Support Manager
Rapid Systems
To Unsubscribe:
Hi Darin,
START just runs an EXE and if you run the batch file it runs as expected.
Yep I've also tried calling the file straight from iMail and have the same
response. I expect it's a setting I've missed...
I've set the EXE file to have complete access so it shouldn't be an access
problem I
Are you guys saying that it wont
update the virus definition file?
From what I understand with Symantec, when
you dont choose to upgrade youre just penalized on not upgrading
the AV engine but the virus definition updates are still occurring. Did I get
this wrong???
gd
GD,
You would
be better served if you contacted the Service Sales Department at Ipswitch. They
would be able to correctly answer your inquiry.
781-676-5700
George Dailey
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Guy Deslauriers
Sent: Tuesday, May
I don't like these partial file names. If you use a full path, you'll be
more likely to know where to look for the results. You appear to be
depending on the Startup Directory (I think it's supposed to be called
Working Directory) but the Program Alias is started by IMail (actually,
probably qmgr)
How did you set the EXE to have complete access? It's really more of an
issue of the service/process that launches it having proper permissions...
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: The Site Doctor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 3:13 PM
Hi Dan,
Many thanks for pointing that out, I don't know why I was doing that, it was
outputting to the System32 folder. Many thanks for pointing out my errors.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Barker
Sent: 10 May 2005 21:25
To:
I've been using an expired version of Ipswitche's AV ver 1.1 for over a year
now, and all I do is just download and apply the updated definitions, stop and
restart the two symantec services, and go back into the Imail admin gui for
windows and it shows the updated defs date. I've verified this
So you just admitted on an open publicly available forum that you are
violating the License agreement?
Symantec expects and should be paid for providing updated definitions.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
On Tuesday, May 10, 2005, 17:46:55, John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
So you just admitted on an open publicly available forum that you are
violating the License agreement?
Symantec expects and should be paid for providing updated definitions.
To give him the benefit of the doubt he didn't
So you just admitted on an open publicly available forum that you are
violating the License agreement?
Symantec expects and should be paid for providing updated definitions.
To give him the benefit of the doubt he didn't mention the state of his
Symantec licensing.
He could have
So you just admitted on an open publicly available forum that you are
violating the License agreement?
Symantec expects and should be paid for providing updated definitions.
To give him the benefit of the doubt he didn't mention the state of his
Symantec licensing.
My understanding had
I know you ask for Mx Guard experiences. Nevertheless
you can check out Declude. I run Declude Pro Version (antivirus and antispam) with
F-prot for about 2 years. No problem at all with them. And best of all, far
more inexpensive that Ipswitch/Imail native antivirus solution Symantec-.
I'm also running Declude Pro for both Virus and Spam (F-Prot for my AV
scanner). It's worked like a charm. It's not the easiest to modify (no
GUI, not the best manual) for us non-pros, but the basics are ready to
go mostly out of the box.
Very satisfied.
Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto
39 matches
Mail list logo
