We are a SERVICE Provider, so we
want to provide a good service to our customers. After the first issue
from them, they cleaned up all Maschines, but the proplem reappered
two wekks later.
Maybe it is some mobile device which gets attached to their network.
So Yes, I shut down their
You could set up a special gateway dedicated only to them. Put it on a timer
so it only runs during the day.
But you really have to solve the problem or help them to do that. Maybe they
would hire you as a consultant to do just that.
Presumably, you could check the logs to determine the
This problem is growing since 8.x but we're getting
spam stuck in the spool folder. This used to be nice since we could
review the files and add any url's to the url-domain but now it's
becoming a pain. They aren't getting processed but are 100% spam and it
would be better if they got
Have you found the IP address of the host?
Should not it be easy to find it in one of the spam messages?
adamc
Matti Haack wrote:
We are a SERVICE Provider, so we want to provide a good service to
our customers. After the first issue from them, they cleaned up
all Maschines, but the
If [EMAIL PROTECTED] is on machine A sending a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on machine B it will never get there if using the home
IMail server as their outbound MTA. IMail doesn't send all mail through the
gateway. It only send remote mail through the gateway and since
example.com is defined
Are you getting both the "Q" and "D" files or just
the "D" files? On the SMTP service what do you have set for the NUll Sender
retry with delete?
Eric S
- Original Message -
From:
Matrosity
Hosting
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006
they appear to be stuck with "T" files. We have 2
retried and delete checked.
Eric Shanbrom wrote:
Are you getting both the "Q" and "D"
files or just the "D" files? On the SMTP service what do you have set
for the NUll Sender retry with delete?
Eric S
-
Original
Have you found the IP address of the host?
Should not it be easy to find it in one of the spam messages?
They use some local mailserver (ken? Jana? or something like this) which
relays the mail to us. So the mails are orginating from this server
and uses the account configured in
Having trouble finding out how to forward a mail (syntax) if the header
contains X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone have any suggestions?
Thanks
Dave
---
|Beach Computers|
|Affordable Hosting Solutions |
|http://www.beachcomp.com
Hi Dave,
a few weeks ago, we made the experience that the X-RCPT-TO can't be used. This
data will be written at the moment, the message will be appended to the mail
box file. So, it's too late to catch it with a rule.
Am Dienstag, 28. März 2006 um
Hmm..
So I have an issue.. Lets see if anyone can think of a solution.
I have an alias that has been found out by spammers.
The alias forwards to a cell and 2 other emails.
Imail is catching the sender as SPAM and flagging it, but since rules dont
seem to apply to aliases, it forwards anyway.
I
If [EMAIL PROTECTED] is on machine A sending a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on machine B it will never get there if using
the home IMail server as their outbound MTA. IMail doesn't send all
mail through the gateway. It only send remote mail through the
gateway and since example.com is
Use outbound rules?
How about creating a mailbox instead of the alias and putting in a main.fwd?
adamc
Beach Computers wrote:
Hmm..
So I have an issue.. Lets see if anyone can think of a solution.
I have an alias that has been found out by spammers.
The alias forwards to a cell and 2 other
This is for incoming mail though.
How would outbound rule help?
Dave
---
|Beach Computers|
|Affordable Hosting Solutions |
|http://www.beachcomp.com |
===
|Cheap Domain Warehouse
T files are _not_
email (message content was not fully delivered to IMail), just delete
them!
Is your SMTP service
being stopped by something on a regular basis? Any message in process at that
time could result in one or more T files.
Daniel
Donnelly
-Original Message-From:
When you said that it forwards to 2 other emails, I assumed emails on
another host.
adamc
Beach Computers wrote:
This is for incoming mail though.
How would outbound rule help?
Dave
---
|Beach Computers|
|Affordable Hosting Solutions
Was not disputing you Len. Just wanted all the bases covered so there
weren't any surprises
Eric S
- Original Message -
From: Len Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: RE: [IMail Forum] [IMail 8.15] James
smtpd32 is sucking up memory to the tune of 700+ MB's
and we restart it daily. Interestingly most of that memory is
virtual. We've got an open case to figure out what's up but no
resolution yet.
Daniel Donnelly wrote:
T
files are _not_ email (message content was not fully delivered
I would like to have a place that I can have ANY error
generated from webmail emailed to us so we know there are problems
before a client informs us of one.
Bill
Well, a single daily
restart should not cause more than a few T files be created (I'm assuming you do
this at night when your users are less likely to be connected and spammers are
more likely). Do the ones you see in the spool folder have timestamps close to
the restart time? If they do,
The times are not matched to a restart of the service.
I emailed logs to support on this very issue yesterday but haven't
heard back yet.
Bill
Daniel Donnelly wrote:
Well,
a single daily restart should not cause more than a few T files be
created (I'm assuming you do this at night
Hi,
Use a monitoring software like WassUp.
Am Dienstag, 28. Mrz 2006 um 23:06 schrieben Sie:
I would like to have a place that I can have ANY error generated from webmail emailed to us so we know there are problems before a client informs
Anything I should watch out for when I upgrade IMail 8.22 to
ICS version 3 on a Windows 2003 Server Domain Controller, this is going to be
an upgrade for IMail that is already there.
Thank You;
Eddie
Hi Eddie,
I just migrated from 8.22 on an NT server to Imail 2006.02a on a Windows
2003 server. Ipswitch has a document somewhere in their KB that describes
the migration process. Despite following it to a T I ended up
with a bunch of problems that ended up being attributed to incorrect
I believe the current version is 2006.03 which is MUCH
faster in terms of web messaging,
Bill
Christian Heller wrote:
Hi Eddie,
I just migrated from 8.22 on an NT server to Imail 2006.02a on a
Windows
2003 server. Ipswitch has a document somewhere in their KB that
describes
the migration
We use Declude Hijack to prevent this sort of thing. It works quite well.
-d
- Original Message -
From: Matti Haack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Adam Campbell Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 9:33 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] SMTP-Relay / Auth only FROM valid
Some people write this off as a mere whitelisting solution, but it is not.
It is a solution that allows you to manage your incoming mail flow based on
IP reputation:
http://www.mujica.com/smtprm.aspx
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rod
27 matches
Mail list logo
