PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] delays
Ummm,
I happen to remember 300 Baud modems and using a teletype to enter a program
in the "mainframe" which would be run as a batch file later that night.
Roger :-)
- Original Message -
From: hostmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTE
That, paper tape, acoustic couplers, and collating machines that you
programmed by hand by rewiring the "spaghetti panel"... Yikes!
- Original Message -
From: Roger Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 1999 2:09 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail For
Hi Dusty et al...
Back when we used to transfer e-mail twice per day.
Uh-oh... FidoNet ??
tom
tom farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pojoaque valley schools
pojoaque nm 87501
"Beauty is in the i of the Beholder"
(Julia Mandelbrot)
Please visit
Message -
From: ## Dusty Carden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 15, 1999 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] delays
Actually we used UUCP connections to places like Holonet in CA
via 2400 baud dialups for e-mail delivery. Boy was I glad when they
came out
I wondered how many of us SysOp's had to find creative ways to hide the
phone bills from our spouses...
- Original Message -
From: ## Dusty Carden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 15, 1999 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] delays
Actually we used UUCP
99 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] delays
Simple problem, simple solution - don't get married. :)
btw, any good looking female network admins er, never mind that g
Jonathan
At 08:29 PM 10/15/99 -0700, you wrote:
I wondered how many of us SysOp's had to find creative ways to hide
This is the problem with expectations. Just 'cause a single email CAN get
through in seconds, users come to expect that ALL WILL transmit
instantaneously. Perhaps we need to build in a delay to slow all mail down
an hour or so, to avoid this problem? ;-)
--Cal Frye
Please visit
Forum] delays
This is the problem with expectations. Just 'cause a single email CAN get
through in seconds, users come to expect that ALL WILL transmit
instantaneously. Perhaps we need to build in a delay to slow all mail down
an hour or so, to avoid this problem? ;-)
Please visit http
Sorry about the html before. Hope this is fixed this time
Here is the mail delay I found in the log. Any suggestions as to why it
takes so long?
10:12 07:26 SMTP-(015C) processing C:\IMAIL\spool\Q1af22ec.SMD
10:12 10:08 SMTP-(005A) finished C:\IMAIL\spool\Q1af22ec.SMP status=3
2 hrs
Whoa, nice one, Michael!! There there are other log lines between those
two lines, non?
Can you see any retry attempts by smtp?
If the remote smto server(s) were busy, then the some Imail smtp rdeliver
lines will not be written (indicates delivery success) until the remote
server is
Michael,
The delivery may have been partially completed in the orginal thread (the ID
number in '()'). Your log shows 2 different process numbers, so the earlier
one must have finished and also show a 'finished' line. If the message has an
address of a host without a backup and was down for 2.5
) 221 neuman.interaccess.com closing connection
stuff like that ..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Len Conrad
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2031 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] delays
Whoa, nice one, Michael
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Donnelly
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 1999 3:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] delays
Michael,
The delivery may have been partially completed in the orginal thread (the ID
number
:34 SMTP-(0140) 221 neuman.interaccess.com closing
connection
stuff like that ..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Len Conrad
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2031 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] delays
Whoa, nice one
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Donnelly
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 1999 4:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] delays
Mike,
If 999 of the addreses are delivered in th efirst pass, having that 1 left
could take as long as the product of your SMTP, Q
om: Michael M. Wiseman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 October 1999 10:27
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] delays
Actually, very few of them fail like that
And the reverse DNS is fine ... but I will check again
Almost every one completes in the first pass... but it take
99 4:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] delays
Mike,
If 999 of the addreses are delivered in th efirst pass, having that 1
left could take as long as the product of your SMTP, Queue Timer *
Number of Tries,
before IMail will stop trying to deliver the message. The default
v
in my server room.
Dusty
- Original Message -
From: Michael M. Wiseman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 1999 12:48 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] delays
Sorry about the html before. Hope this is fixed this time
Here is the mail delay I
18 matches
Mail list logo