Re[2]: [IMail Forum] iMail is extremely stable

2002-01-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Imail...it has been stable for me, but I'm using 6.06, and refuse to upgrade since it's not broken (so why fix it). And it appears in following the list that the 7.x thing is totally and completely fubar. Add to that the non-existant tech support. So, I'm using Imail so I'll bash. It's

Re: [IMail Forum] iMail is extremely stable

2002-01-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
Where do I start Should I list what works?... My biggest problem was with intermittent ssl failures which require restart of web messaging(search the archives...its not just me), thus causing all emails in progress to be lostpeople really hate that(Especially the CEO). I encountered

RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] iMail is extremely stable

2002-01-25 Thread Pau Ruiz Perez
@thumpernet Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 2:52 PM To: R. Scott Perry Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] iMail is extremely stable Hi, Imail...it has been stable for me, but I'm using 6.06, and refuse to upgrade since it's not broken (so why fix it). And it appears in following the list that the 7.x

RE: [IMail Forum] iMail is extremely stable

2002-01-25 Thread Robert Stull
In reply to 24 Jan message from [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Isn't this an IMail discussion group? Why are people who've quit using IMail posting messages to the group? I wonder about that too. If they aren't running IMail anymore, why are they still on this list? It's not like it is a low volume

Re: [IMail Forum] iMail is extremely stable

2002-01-25 Thread Ron Covington
: [IMail Forum] iMail is extremely stable In reply to 24 Jan message from [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Isn't this an IMail discussion group? Why are people who've quit using IMail posting messages to the group? I wonder about that too. If they aren't running IMail anymore, why are they still

Re[2]: [IMail Forum] iMail is extremely stable

2002-01-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 9:20 AM RC Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] iMail is extremely stable In reply to 24 Jan message from [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Isn't this an IMail discussion group? Why are people who've quit using IMail posting messages to the group? I wonder about that too

Re: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] iMail is extremely stable

2002-01-25 Thread Ron Covington
Forum] iMail is extremely stable Hi, How noble of you. That's gotta be one of the most arrogant statements I've ever seen on the net. I've been in the computer biz 15 years, 7 starting and running Internet services. I have neither lack of work or knowledge. This being an Imail list, me

Re[4]: [IMail Forum] iMail is extremely stable

2002-01-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: andyb@thumpernet [EMAIL PROTECTED] RC To: Ron Covington [EMAIL PROTECTED] RC Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 12:27 PM RC Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] iMail is extremely stable Hi, How noble of you. That's gotta be one of the most arrogant statements I've ever seen on the net. I've been

RE: [IMail Forum] iMail is extremely stable

2002-01-24 Thread R. Scott Perry
I don't get it... Isn't this an IMail discussion group? Why are people who've quit using IMail posting messages to the group? I wonder about that too. If they aren't running IMail anymore, why are they still on this list? It's not like it is a low volume list that can easily be forgotten.

Re: [IMail Forum] iMail is extremely stable

2002-01-24 Thread Rick cossey
: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:12 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] iMail is extremely stable I don't get it... Isn't this an IMail discussion group? Why are people who've quit using IMail posting messages to the group? I wonder about that too. If they aren't running IMail anymore, why