Re: infra ticket stats

2020-04-14 Thread clime
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 01:18, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Just FYI, I gathered some real simple stats on our infrastructure > tickets. Just counting the number opened and the number closed per > month. So this doesn't include existing tickets, just new and closed. > And of course some tickets are

infra ticket stats

2020-04-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Just FYI, I gathered some real simple stats on our infrastructure tickets. Just counting the number opened and the number closed per month. So this doesn't include existing tickets, just new and closed. And of course some tickets are easier than others, etc. open | closed 2018-01:

Re: some orphans we should take

2020-04-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 02:46:56PM +, Mattia Verga wrote: > Il 13/04/20 01:06, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > > > >> About pam_url, the spec file points the sources to > >> https://fedorahosted.org/pam_url which doesn't exist anymore. I assume > >> we can use https://github.com/mricon/pam_url ? But

Re: FBR: remove elections from inventory and run noc.yml playbook

2020-04-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 03:55:36PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 15:49, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 03:08:25PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > The following patch should do a minimal removal of the elections app from > > > ansible

Re: FBR: remove elections from inventory and run noc.yml playbook

2020-04-14 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 15:49, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 03:08:25PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > The following patch should do a minimal removal of the elections app from > > ansible inventory so that a run of noc.yml will remove the systems from > > being monitored.

Re: FBR: remove elections from inventory and run noc.yml playbook

2020-04-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 03:08:25PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > The following patch should do a minimal removal of the elections app from > ansible inventory so that a run of noc.yml will remove the systems from > being monitored. Then we can turn off the elections systems. Wrong patch

FBR: remove elections from inventory and run noc.yml playbook

2020-04-14 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
The following patch should do a minimal removal of the elections app from ansible inventory so that a run of noc.yml will remove the systems from being monitored. Then we can turn off the elections systems. -- Stephen J Smoogen. From acd374d1ba95aba044fc3417bb8a1ce191fe510b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00

Re: ansible playbook to create koji tags

2020-04-14 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 19:11, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 04:20:22PM +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have been playing a little bit around with the koji-ansible collection > > and created a Proof of Concept playbook that creates the main tags for a > > release

Re: ansible playbook to create koji tags

2020-04-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 04:20:22PM +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > Hi all, > > I have been playing a little bit around with the koji-ansible collection > and created a Proof of Concept playbook that creates the main tags for a > release in koji (staging). > > I have installed the collection on

Re: [FBR] Add kerneltest.fp.o reverse proxy + post-fact FBR

2020-04-14 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 16:38, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 04:03:59PM +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > >On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 14:33, Pierre-Yves Chibon <[1] > pin...@pingoured.fr> > >wrote: > > > > Good Morning, > > > > While working on [2] >

Re: ansible playbook to create koji tags

2020-04-14 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 04:20:22PM +0200, Clement Verna wrote: >Hi all, >I have been playing a little bit around with the koji-ansible collection >and created a Proof of Concept playbook that creates the main tags for a >release in koji (staging). >I have installed the

Re: [FBR] Add kerneltest.fp.o reverse proxy + post-fact FBR

2020-04-14 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 04:03:59PM +0200, Clement Verna wrote: >On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 14:33, Pierre-Yves Chibon <[1]pin...@pingoured.fr> >wrote: > > Good Morning, > > While working on [2]https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8035 > to help > Kevin I ended up

ansible playbook to create koji tags

2020-04-14 Thread Clement Verna
Hi all, I have been playing a little bit around with the koji-ansible collection and created a Proof of Concept playbook that creates the main tags for a release in koji (staging). I have installed the collection on batcave01 running the following ``` ansible-galaxy collection install

Re: [FBR] Add kerneltest.fp.o reverse proxy + post-fact FBR

2020-04-14 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 14:33, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning, > > While working on https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8035 to > help > Kevin I ended up adding the following commit to the proxies and running the > proxy playbook for it: > > commit

[FBR] Add kerneltest.fp.o reverse proxy + post-fact FBR

2020-04-14 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning, While working on https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8035 to help Kevin I ended up adding the following commit to the proxies and running the proxy playbook for it: commit d6fe2e08a6897470cdaf3ecd191c5329dca49b3c Author: Pierre-Yves Chibon Date: Tue Apr 14 11:25:17

CPE Weekly: 2020-04-14

2020-04-14 Thread Aoife Moloney
# CPE Weekly: 2020-04-14 --- title: CPE Weekly status email tags: CPE Weekly, email --- Hi All, Apologies for the delayed weekly mail, I enjoyed a lovely four-day weekend with my family over Easter which was important and didn't get around to sending this email. The upside is you get two emails