-Original Message-
From: Wesley Eddy [mailto:w...@mti-systems.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 8:26 PM
To: Dan Wing
Cc: 'Scott Brim'; 'Joe Touch'; 'Internet Area'; 'Behcet Sarikaya'
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Completion of working group last call for
draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal
On Aug 6, 2012, at 5:29 PM, Dan Wing wrote:
...
During the INTAREA presentation, one suggestion I heard was
a separate protocol (ident-like). I will submit an I-D towards
that end, which I am dusting off from 2010 when I first
considered ident and discarded it for a variety of reasons.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Joe Touch to...@isi.edu wrote:
On Aug 6, 2012, at 5:29 PM, Dan Wing wrote:
...
During the INTAREA presentation, one suggestion I heard was
a separate protocol (ident-like). I will submit an I-D towards
that end, which I am dusting off from 2010 when I first
-Original Message-
From: Scott Brim [mailto:scott.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 8:02 AM
To: Joe Touch
Cc: Dan Wing; Internet Area; Behcet Sarikaya
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Completion of working group last call for
draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02
On Wed
On Aug 8, 2012, at 8:30 AM, Dan Wing wrote:
3) making sure that not everyone can associate the identity with that
tag.
Scott,
Today's Internet users, which are not sharing addresses with other users,
are sending an uniquely-identifyable identifier to every Internet server
they use:
On 8/8/2012 11:30 AM, Dan Wing wrote:
Today's Internet users, which are not sharing addresses with other users,
are sending an uniquely-identifyable identifier to every Internet server
they use: their unique IP address.
Users don't have IP addresses. Machines do. Which are
we trying to
-Original Message-
From: Wesley Eddy [mailto:w...@mti-systems.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2012 12:28 AM
To: Dan Wing
Cc: sarik...@ieee.org; 'Internet Area'; 'Behcet Sarikaya'
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Completion of working group last call for
draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis
; Internet
Area Objet : Re: [Int-area] Completion of working group last call
for draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02
On Jul 27, 2012, at 0:09, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
The argument I heard in Paris meeting for including a
recommendation is to help vendors to select the solution
In your previous mail you wrote:
You keep saying privacy, but without explaining the problem or
how IPv4 address sharing makes privacy better or worse than IPv6.
= there are two levels about the privacy problem: the technical one
which is explained/addressed in the draft (section 4) and
Hi,
On Jul 29, 2012, at 23:41, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
Could be more explict and explain what is missing in
draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02 to reach that stage?
the goal of this draft was to survey the options. I don't think it should make
any recommendation at all.
If
In your previous mail you wrote:
What analysis is missing from draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis
to weigh the drawbacks of the 8 solutions.
= there are two kinds of drawbacks: the technical drawbacks and the not
technical drawbacks, e.g., the impact on privacy... Note because if the
of working group last call for
draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02
On 7/26/2012 1:08 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:25 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
wrote:
Dear Suresh, all,
After reading received comments, the major point we need to discuss
is whether the WG
-Message d'origine-
De : int-area-boun...@ietf.org
[mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Suresh Krishnan
Envoyé : vendredi 20 juillet 2012 20:56
À : Internet Area
Objet : [Int-area] Completion of working group last call for
draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02
Hi all,
After going
On Jul 27, 2012, at 0:09, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
The argument I heard in Paris meeting for including a recommendation is to
help vendors to select the solution to implement in their devices. They can
not provide the same feature using 8 implementation options. That argument
d'origine-
De : int-area-boun...@ietf.org
[mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Suresh Krishnan
Envoyé : vendredi 20 juillet 2012 20:56
À : Internet Area
Objet : [Int-area] Completion of working group last call for
draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02
Hi all,
After going
Hi all,
After going through the responses to the WGLC, it is clear that the
draft is not ready to go forward in the publication process. We will
discuss further steps for this draft at the Vancouver meeting.
Thanks
Suresh Julien
___
Int-area mailing
16 matches
Mail list logo
