Hi Daniel,
Attached is the dmidecode_output.txt
Just let me know if there is anything else that I can do to help.
John Tapsell
On 6 January 2013 21:13, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
Now with the intel-gfx m-l address fixed ...
-Daniel
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Daniel
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 22:13 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Now with the intel-gfx m-l address fixed ...
-Daniel
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
Hi all,
Looks ugly, and the original commit doesn't have any link to the
dmidecode information.
On 01/07/2013 04:36 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:12:12AM +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 22:13 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Now with the intel-gfx m-l address fixed ...
-Daniel
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:12:12AM +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 22:13 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Now with the intel-gfx m-l address fixed ...
-Daniel
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
wrote:
Hi all,
Looks ugly, and the
Now with the intel-gfx m-l address fixed ...
-Daniel
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
Hi all,
Looks ugly, and the original commit doesn't have any link to the
dmidecode information. SjoerdJohn, can you both please attach the
output of dmidecode? If