So I just used the example multimedia project in Qt Creator and added the
same line, it fails the same way.
Before I go filing a bug report though, could this be because I'm running
Big Sur in a VM? (Parallels)
This is what I've been doing to compile and run the app without that line
just fine
On 9/30/21 3:44 PM, Ulf Hermann wrote:
As of last month, 1.26% of all laptops and desktop computers
worldwide were still running on the 19-year-old OS. That’s a greater
proportion than much younger operating systems Windows 8 (0.57%),
ChromeOS (0.42%) and Windows Vista (0.12%).
The only thing
Hi,
Please file a bug with a sample project that reproduces this issue, thanks!
tor arne
On 30 Sep 2021, at 20:28, Wesley Krasko
mailto:wesbl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Thanks. So I added this to my pro file for macos:
QMAKE_APPLE_DEVICE_ARCHS="x86_64 arm64"
It looked like it was going to
Thank you
It's equal to building Qt5, wich I did before, I thought that for Qt6 git
sources were no longer available.
CheersJoão
Em quinta-feira, 30 de setembro de 2021 19:18:03 GMT+1, Shawn Rutledge
escreveu:
On 2021 Sep 30, at 19:21, joao morgado via Interest
wrote:
Hi
I
Thanks. So I added this to my pro file for macos:
QMAKE_APPLE_DEVICE_ARCHS="x86_64 arm64"
It looked like it was going to build fine and then I got 1 build error
for my app :(
It says:
cannot use 'c++-cpp-output' output with multiple -arch options
I searched that and fine results for
On 2021 Sep 30, at 19:21, joao morgado via Interest
mailto:interest@qt-project.org>> wrote:
Hi
I have a commercial Qt license, can I compile Qt 6.2.1 branch from source ?
I have reported some bugs that are now fixed in that branch, would like to try
it.
I've been searching codereview
Hi
I have a commercial Qt license, can I compile Qt 6.2.1 branch from source ?I
have reported some bugs that are now fixed in that branch, would like to try it.
I've been searching codereview repositories, but I'm a bit lost.
ThanksJoão
___
Interest
On Thursday, 30 September 2021 06:59:17 PDT Roland Hughes via Interest wrote:
> As the very public conversations with our friend Scott have revealed,
> even Intel is running **in production** systems Qt dropped. Ironic since
> they are using it to make the very chips needed to run Qt at least in
>
> On 30 Sep 2021, at 15:59, Roland Hughes via Interest
> wrote:
> On 9/30/21 5:00 AM, interest-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 29 September 2021 07:40:11 PDT Rui Oliveira wrote:
>>
>>> "Both *Windows 7 or 8.x*
>>> version support will not be available for Qt 6"
>>>
>>
As of last month, 1.26% of all laptops and desktop computers
worldwide were still running on the 19-year-old OS. That’s a greater
proportion than much younger operating systems Windows 8 (0.57%),
ChromeOS (0.42%) and Windows Vista (0.12%).
The only thing one has to do to keep these systems
On 9/30/21 5:00 AM, interest-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 September 2021 07:40:11 PDT Rui Oliveira wrote:
"Both*Windows 7 or 8.x* version support will not be available for Qt 6"
11 matches
Mail list logo