Hi Mike,
I just found out that exactly this behavior (changing the display from
static to relative) messes up my page too, only in IE: a known issue
with the IE's z-index stacks (well described at http://mahzeh.org/?p=19).
Could you consider, if possible, reverting the blocking element's
display
Could you consider, if possible, reverting the blocking element's
display attribute back to static after unblocking?
The plugin already does that.
The issue is that, when calling blockUI on that DIV, it makes the div go
above the UL/LI elements. I tried to change the zindex values everywhere,
with no effect. I do not understand why the DIV is modified by blockUI ?
The div is not modified, it's the blocking overlay that has a higher
Hi,
Yes it is modified, because the div itself (not the blocking overlay) comes
over the ul/li elements when calling blockUI on it.
And yep I tried to change the baseZ option. I set it to 1, 0... And I set my
ul/li zindex to 1 with no effect.
Here is some sample code, so that is easier
Yes it is modified, because the div itself (not the blocking overlay) comes
over the ul/li elements when calling blockUI on it.
To clarify, the zIndex of the div is not modified. The only thing
modified on the blocked element (the div in your case) is the position
style, and only if it is
So there is no way to fix/correct that behavior ?
Like maybe modifying my ul or my li ?
Thanks for your help Mike
malsup wrote:
Yes it is modified, because the div itself (not the blocking overlay)
comes
over the ul/li elements when calling blockUI on it.
To clarify, the zIndex of
So there is no way to fix/correct that behavior ?
Like maybe modifying my ul or my li ?
Is this only a problem on IE? IE does weird shit with the effetive z-
index of relatively positioned elements. If your design allows it,
try giving your UL position:relative and a very high z-index.
Hi !
The bug occurs on IE and FF (I've not tested others).
I already tried to give a high zindex but with no success. I haven't tried
position:relative on my UL yet, I'll try it at work on monday, or maybe I'll
reproduce the case at home and try it here.
malsup wrote:
So there is no way
8 matches
Mail list logo
