Re: Importance of other scripting languages [Was: Re: JSP Form]

1999-09-02 Thread Steve Odendahl
At 09:22 PM 8/27/99 +, Scott Ferguson wrote: JSP 1.0 already allows other scripting languages. That's what the %@ page language=javascript % is for. Resin (http://www.caucho.com) supports both Java and JavaScript as valid JSP 1.0 languages. I may have missed it, but I don't see

Importance of other scripting languages [Was: Re: JSP Form]

1999-08-27 Thread Steve Odendahl
Doesn't this question highlight the importance of supporting at least one scripting language for scriptlets? (I'm not counting Java as a scripting language.) It seems to me that at least some users of JSP should not have to understand the distinction between reference equality and content

Re: Importance of other scripting languages [Was: Re: JSP Form]

1999-08-27 Thread Mark A. Kolb
What plans are there to allow scripting languages in the next JSP spec? Will the vendors be able to decide which languages they support (given that they must support Java at a minimum)? Actually, support for alternative scripting languages is explicitly allowed in the current 1.1 spec (see

Re: Importance of other scripting languages [Was: Re: JSP Form]

1999-08-27 Thread Scott Ferguson
Steve Odendahl wrote: What plans are there to allow scripting languages in the next JSP spec? Will the vendors be able to decide which languages they support (given that they must support Java at a minimum)? JSP 1.0 already allows other scripting languages. That's what the %@ page